Advert

Waiting to be jailed

Jobless father could not afford to appeal maintenance ruling

David Muscat says he could not afford to pay maintenance after losing his job. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi

David Muscat says he could not afford to pay maintenance after losing his job. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi

David Muscat expects a policeman to knock on his door at any minute to take him to serve a month in jail for not paying his ex-wife maintenance while he was temporarily unemployed.

If a person does not find the money to appeal against such a decision, will he have to live with that for the rest of his life?

“My bags are packed. I’m waiting for someone to come and get me,” the 52-year-old told The Sunday Times, claiming he did not have enough money to appeal against the decision.

Mr Muscat said he could not understand in the first place how the Civil Court fixed the monthly maintenance to his ex-wife and their three children at €1,000 – which included €300 per child and €100 for his wife – when a court-appointed legal procurator recommended it should be €580.

An appeal court later reduced the maintenance to €400 per month – €200 for two of the children as one had become an adult and no maintenance for the wife – but by that time he had lost his job.

This meant he failed to make payments for four months, as his only income was €380 per month in social benefits.

Last Wednesday, Magistrate Anthony Vella sentenced Mr Muscat to a month’s imprisonment for failing to make the required maintenance payments.

He had a week to appeal but claimed he could not afford to pay the court and legal fees.

While not getting into the details of the separation case, Mr Muscat feels he was the victim of the Civil Court decision in October last year that set maintenance at a rate he could not afford – even while he was employed at a restaurant.

The Sunday Times saw a document issued by the Employment and Training Corporation showing that he and another three employees were made redundant in October 2011.

His wife filed a report when he failed to pay maintenance between December 2011 and March 2012, which is when criminal proceedings were issued against him.

Mr Muscat said he found a job in March and started earning just under €800 a month.

He borrowed money to appeal against the Civil Court decision and, last June, the appeal court reduced the maintenance to €400.

However, the latest development has upset Mr Muscat.

“If a person does not find the money to appeal against such a decision, will he have to live with that for the rest of his life? Even at the cost of living in poverty?

“How can I get reimbursed for all the money and time wasted?”

Advert

117 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Hossam Helwani

Nov 12th 2012, 09:21

@ anthony pace, I shudder to think if this method was to be adopted in Malta!!!!!!!! Just consider how convenient it would be to fake it all. I do not think that this should be available God Forbid , with single mothers telling us a story about mysterious phantom fathers I do not think I would wish to know more!

fred sammut

Nov 12th 2012, 10:25

sakemm niftah il gazzeta u nsib li hemm nies jridu jhadmu in nies ma tantx nemmen li ma jsibux xol. VERU li jhallsu bil karawet imma minn irrid jahdem jaghmel dak li hemm bzonn.

Carmel Garcia

Nov 14th 2012, 11:07

Agreed

Paul Bajada

Nov 11th 2012, 21:09

and you think there are no mothers who are ALSO supposed to pay alimonies but invent all sorts of excuses not to work and dont pay alimonies to their kids?

mark borg

Nov 11th 2012, 21:28

then you should do your duty and report them to the authorities

K. Vella II

Nov 11th 2012, 22:35

And I know a lot of women who claim to be in need of money when i) they hold a full-time job ii) they moved in (with the kids) with a partner who also holds a full-time job. And yet the ex-husband keeps paying the alimony.

Michelle Vella

Nov 11th 2012, 22:36

But its not the case here.... Mr. Muscat genuinely lost his job and the court failed to see the real picture!!!!

R. Gauci

Nov 11th 2012, 23:33

And go to prison? Courts aren't lenient with men as with women my dear.

Louis Muscat

Nov 11th 2012, 23:44

Mariella, if you had read the article properly, you should see that he was not the only one who was redundant. If you want to speak in general, Yes I also know a lot mothers who plays the innocent type and then one can see them at Paceville flirting with man.

Joe Fenech

Nov 12th 2012, 00:06

What are you trying to insinuate? Do you know what being made redundant means?

Steve Demicoli

Nov 12th 2012, 08:35


And how many separated women do you know who stop working purposely and seek undocumented, clandestine work so that they receive maintenance?

C. Muscat

Nov 12th 2012, 08:36

@K. Vella !! that the woman moved in with another man is beside the point....the kids are still the dad's children...what do you expect that the partner pays through his teeth for the upbringing of the estranged dad's children?! Having said that, this case appears to be genuine and the wife should have given him time to find another job before filing reports, which he did after a couple of months.

r buttigieg

Nov 12th 2012, 22:58

women can work nowadays so no excuses, if you seperated only the kids' share should be granted, the woman needs to fend for herself. welcome to leechville

Kim Borg

Nov 12th 2012, 00:18

I totally agree

Christian Sciberras

Nov 11th 2012, 19:11

I don't even see them mentioning the children. Having to pay a monthly maintenance fee does not mean his wife/children are dying of poverty...

Andrew Terry Buttigieg

Nov 11th 2012, 18:41

I would give my vote to the politician who brings thing equal and fair. Thats all I say for any other man who sees this as unfair.

Anthony Paul Naudi

Nov 12th 2012, 01:54

That's a very good comment.
A.P.Naudi

Aldo Buttigieg

Nov 11th 2012, 20:03

You are right Mr. Attard

Denis Pace

Nov 11th 2012, 19:54

Issa zzejjed....Trial by media or by BLOGGERS!
Leave the president out of this!

Martin Saliba

Nov 11th 2012, 20:34

Deis , the ag , cabinet and the president opened pandoras box , its up to them to make things right .

Brian Gatt

Nov 12th 2012, 11:31

Sorry we cant leave the President out of this he got in it when he issued the first pardon...what's good for the Goose is good for the Gender now Mr President

J Martinelli

Nov 11th 2012, 16:37

Let's put it trhis way, Joseph Micallef. If it rains, it's Gonzi's fault, but when the sun shines, it's all to Joseph's credit, no?
Let's hope that when Joseph becomes PM, the sun will shine all the time!

Joseph Micallef

Nov 11th 2012, 20:17

Let's put it this way Mr. Martinelli. Your argument surely doesn't hold! Did I mention Dr. Muscat? Mhux GonziPN made so much fuss about the 20,000 jobs? about the ultra, mega, enormous Brazilian company? Mhux GonziPN tried to ridicule Dr. Muscat on a simple, humble question about the status of the Brazilian firm? So GonziPN is to be criticized not Dr. Muscat!

mark borg

Nov 11th 2012, 21:29

maybe he was employed with the very very large BRAZILIAN company

m busuttil

Nov 11th 2012, 17:32

so sorry but then he should not have had children, if he was a lawyer or doctor or whatever he worked or works if need be he goes to clean the roads or any degrading job to be able to feed your children who never asked to come in this world to suffer

Elaine Compagno

Nov 11th 2012, 17:37

Dear Peter Murray, there are MOTHERS keeping themselves and their children on 425 Eur a month, while paying rent after leaving their husbands following years of abuse while the husband gets away with not paying alimony with impunity because the police force 'cannot find him' to serve him with the summons.
Maybe you cannot imagine it. Maybe you should try wearing someone else's shoes for a day.

John Dee

Nov 11th 2012, 18:57

m busuttil - so no-one should have children just in case their marriage fails? Very bright response.

m busuttil

Nov 11th 2012, 19:42

Mr. Dee, what I said if you decide to bring children in this world you need to see to all their needs and when you have lost job you do what you do not like if need be clean toilet drains as the children never asked to be born so its up the parents to see that they have food,clothes and what they might need for education I am not saying mobile and so on just enough to be like all other kids

m busuttil

Nov 11th 2012, 19:46

Mr. Dee, when my late husband was sick and without a job I had twins under a year old and to make ends meet I look after another set of twins under 3 months so I was looking after a very sick man, 3 older children and two sets of twins to be able to provide all with a warm meal the parents are to provide to their offspring no if or buts

R. Borg

Nov 11th 2012, 20:35

m busuttil the MOTHER should get to clean the roads and provide for her children in the same way as the father should provide assistance for his children. But why should a mother earn her living when when she can get everything for free from her unemployed ex husband. Similar injustices are the order of the day.

Elaine Compagno

Nov 11th 2012, 22:11

R. Borg, perhaps she should. After all, taking on the couple's children like they were her own only is expected of any woman. Many child care centres around to ship kids off to while the mother works all the hours god gave her, to make a living. I mean, why on earth should the father carry any burden or shoulder any responsibility for heaven's sake! It's not like he was there to make the babies!

Andrew Terry Buttigieg

Nov 11th 2012, 18:40

Shame and Shame... say something constructive such as men are afraid of marriage cause laws are becoming so draconian towards men.

C. Muscat

Nov 12th 2012, 08:43

Lol....designer clothes with Eur1000 per month and 3 children to look after!!!! Seriously?!!!

m busuttil

Nov 11th 2012, 17:39

agree the best is to go and find anything collect rubbish if need be as only the children are always suffering before we decide to have children we must plan to see that they at least have the basic things hot food , clothes,schooling ,at least this goes to both parents to see to their children's wellbeing they never asked to be born you had the pleasure you now need to see that you find work

Andrew Terry Buttigieg

Nov 11th 2012, 18:34

I can't believe you just said that. I wonder how you would feel put into that situation.

K. Vella II

Nov 11th 2012, 22:38

How does putting them in a home for 'hopeless cases' help them get employed?

connie grixti

Nov 11th 2012, 18:12

This person has a job and is willing to pay alimony according to his wages. Will he still have a job if he goes to jail?

Mr John Borg

Nov 11th 2012, 14:56

Skuzani tafx, 350,000,000 job kien hemm!!

joseph green

Nov 11th 2012, 15:13

Imma kif kollox politika taghmlu , ikber naqra habib

Jason Zammit

Nov 11th 2012, 15:26

Get a life siehbi ......

Justin Spiteri

Nov 11th 2012, 15:36

20,000 Job ta 600 EUR fix xahar minimum wage?

Jeanette Stivala

Nov 11th 2012, 14:37

Hey do NOT judge all woman as un trustworthy how dare you I have been married for over 30 years and Im sure my husband is happy .Maybe as you are such a male chauvinist you don.t deserve to have a wife, and when you are old and lonely I am sure you and your money will be happy enjoy

Mr robert micallef

Nov 11th 2012, 14:52

ah well enjoy your pay then. for me when my kids tell me im the best papa in the world that makes my day. as for a wife you should chose someone who is worth to be your lifelong companion. but then you have to spend the rest of your life being her best companion.

Andrew Terry Buttigieg

Nov 11th 2012, 18:47

@Jeanette Stivala - all people can be attributed to trust and mis-trust. Being Female doesn't afford you a special 'I am good' status.

Joseph Sant

Nov 11th 2012, 15:07

Agreed. I sometimes think that even if one do not beleive in Religion, one should enforce certain rules as these make econimical sense. One should suffer for the good of the whole. We cannot get the cake and eat it, if we got married suck it up and stay that way till you rot and die, you are just a number and you better accept it. Try to mend your marriage, there is no easy way out my friend.

Colin Camilleri

Nov 11th 2012, 14:44

Debts are translated into prison terms, meaning these are considered paid in full with the fulfillment of the prison term.

Elaine Compagno

Nov 11th 2012, 16:04

As far as I know, the maintenance owed is still owed. The prison term is for the crime. The mother can then sue the father in a small claims case once he is out.

Andrew Terry Buttigieg

Nov 11th 2012, 18:44

@Elaine Compagno.... chilling the fact you know such knowledge.

Michelle Vella

Nov 11th 2012, 22:58

Facts are facts... This is more a case of human rights! The laws are meant to protect the vulnerable??? And yet it is the same law who is attacking the vulnerable!

Elaine Compagno

Nov 11th 2012, 11:46

If those two months are the only times he missed payments, I find the sentence surprising. I know women who have been going to court for years over unpaid maintenance for nothing. The inconsistency is astounding.
I think he should have split his limited income with his kids. When a non-separated father loses his job, the whole family relies on his unemployment benefits - not just himself.

J Galea

Nov 11th 2012, 13:41

Mr Scerri here has a point...

Charles Fenech

Nov 11th 2012, 13:54

kemm nikkoregik wahda, wehlu 60 euro mhux ghax sawtu imma minhabba l ilbies mhux xiraq ghal qorti. jigifiri tallu sawtu ma wehlu XEJN.

Martin Saliba

Nov 11th 2012, 12:04

Of course theres more to it, this parent is male !!

Peter Murray

Nov 11th 2012, 13:26

Try living on 95 euros a week before giving any away as maintenance payments

Elaine Compagno

Nov 11th 2012, 14:33

Peter Murray, a person has children living with him/her and has 95 eur a week, would he or she leave their kids hungry and without their basic needs because they only have 95 eur??? Please think. Maintenance is not a gift. It is the livelihood of a family/children for which someone is responsible in keeping.

C. Vella

Nov 11th 2012, 17:27

Elaine Compagno in reality this person is more entitled to a presidential pardon than the mother of the 16yr old who blatantly refused to obey the court. This man is a victim of laws that protect the wives but not the husbands. Equality must be two way and not exclusive to women.

connie grixti

Nov 11th 2012, 19:19

But the courts have to listen, not have people file a "Rikors" for nothing. Also to make sense, such a "rikors" should be filed with no charge.

Louis Muscat

Nov 11th 2012, 16:51

The law in Malta always on the side of the women.What about that other woman who was giving a pardon, without taking into consideration of all the facts.

Louis Muscat

Nov 11th 2012, 16:54

I agree with you, but I have my suspicions about the some judges.

m busuttil

Nov 11th 2012, 17:47

agree 1000%

connie grixti

Nov 11th 2012, 19:53

If you had understood the article, the point is that our courts should be more sensitive in their judgements

Matthew Grima

Nov 12th 2012, 18:48

Since you are able to write, you are able to read. So scroll back up and read the article.

And why can't the mother work?

Steve Demicoli

Nov 11th 2012, 10:26


Agree 100% - hope the feminists don't object though

Advert
Advert