Getting a Brazilian
I don't recall much about what the PM had said when he had told the quivering masses that we were going to get a Brazilian. Politicians tend to announce these things at the drop of a hat and Dr Gonzi is not immune from the temptation to impart good news when he has it.
On the other hand, I don't recall the news as having been received with great joy and waving of flags in the streets and squares of the Republic, probably because we're not some ruddy Third World Tinpot New Economy Zone that depends on munificent foreigners deigning to descend amongst us to supply jobs to the starving masses. Obviously, the more investment we have, the better and the more choices of places to work that the citizenry at large has, even more the better, but companies come and companies go, that's the nature of a Western economy.
The important thing is that people who want to work have jobs and, while we haven't reached the Acme of Perfection in this regard (I seem to remember my Scottish economics master in the Lower Sixth about forty-odd years ago telling us this wasn't possible, though his accent was somewhat impenetrable) we're not as badly off as we could have been. "We want more and better" should remain our watchword, of course.
It is to Labour's discredit, then, that they are showing such undisguised glee at the fact that the plans made by this Brazilian conglomerate have fallen through, apparently. These things happen, world-wide and all the time, but the way people like Gino Cauchi and Leo Brincat were smirking about it when I spotted them on the box a couple of days ago was nauseating in the extreme. I suppose they, like the rest of the Labour machine, have been moved to cover up their Leader's obvious ignorance of the nature of the operation that was to have been set up, but all the same, they really should learn to curb their enthusiasm when things don't go the way they were predicted to go.
If they don't, can you imagine the cheesy grins they'd have all over the faces, the celebrations in which they would indulge, if some important enterprise were to fail? They'd simply love it.
This is not to say that the Government shouldn't have handled things better. I know it's difficult to put across an argument when you have people like the afore-mentioned Gino Cauchi yapping away, for all the world as if he had chosen to adopt the toddler's way of arguing, which is to repeat the same thing over and over and over, but come on guys, you've got a good message to put across, get on with and put it out there.
Because otherwise the electorate is going to have to choose between Muscat's slogans and wish-lists, to say nothing of his turgidly un-witty billboards, and the PN option, which seems to be to rely on its record. It's a good record, minor blips and Labour red-herrings notwithstanding, but people don't necessarily have memories that go back longer than yesterday's breakfast.
14 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
M. Grech
Nov 10th 2012, 21:37
Why did Dr Gonzi go for a fast on Dr. Muscat? Dr. Gonzi felt he was on the losing end during that debate and he went for it to score despite the eventual repercussions as they developed this week. I see a trend here. Every time PN and PL leaders meet on TV, during important debates, the PN leader always tries a fast one hoping he gets away with it! Remember? People now wait for it in such debates!
George Attard
Nov 10th 2012, 10:21
The intention to create business was obviously there. They messed up, it happens, move on.
There is nothing Labour can do to equal or come close to what investment has been brought into this country in the last 25 years, even if they themselves govern for that amount of time.
pat muscat
Nov 9th 2012, 23:40
Dr Gonzi tried to belittle Dr Muscat on the 'Brazilian' 50 million euro investment. Well, I think Dr Gonzi belitled himself because someone must have fed him crap on this 'huge' investment! The man in the street understood who was bluffing: indeed using today's Xarabank, GonziPn tried to do some damage control.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Nov 9th 2012, 21:51
The PM tried to ridicule 'Muscat' because, as some PN supporters are now putting it, he did not know that the company was in Malta. What is interesting is that the PM did not know that the company was about to leave Malta's blessed shores. There are many questions to be resolved. How many of those employed were Maltese?
Joe Vella
Nov 9th 2012, 23:55
It is does not matter how many Maltese were employed or not. The fact that a foreign company sets up business in Malta give credence to Malta on the International scene. Is it that hard for the Gloom and Dom crowd to understand. Even, if this company while in Malta didn't employ one Maltese, I am sure thy had to engage many ancillary services from Maltese Companies. So what is wrong with that?
Joe Muscat
Nov 9th 2012, 17:54
You seem to have missed the wood for the trees...Big time... and very conveniently..as usual... The fact that Your dear Gonzi Tried to impress on people, what a great and important investment this major Brasilian Company was making in Malta, while knowing it was untrue, is what you are trying to ignore.. The truth came out quickly and it hurts GonziPN's credibilty, or what's left of it..Good try..
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Nov 9th 2012, 21:54
What credibility?
Mr F J Brincat
Nov 9th 2012, 17:52
Dr Borg Cardona: When in election mode, anything a politician says is scrutinsed minutely. This is a case of the PM trying to gain political mileage and failing. The glee is more at the PM's discomfort rather than at the loss of investment.
Eddy Privitera
Nov 9th 2012, 13:07
Trust ABC to try and defend the indefensible !
Robert Gatt
Nov 11th 2012, 01:03
I'd rather trust you, for that, Eddy. Especially when it comes to your belief that Malta should still opt out of the EU. Even PL, today, acknowledges that this was a decision that was the best way forward for our country.
Malcolm Seychell
Nov 11th 2012, 21:44
Robert Gatt. You should worry that 40% still do not think that joining the EU was a good decision. and this is when we have 3 parties all in favour. I voted yes, but today I would vote no.
Mr Andrew Camilleri
Nov 9th 2012, 12:30
Your dear Gonzi is making one gaffe after another. I feel he is tired fighting off his own back-stabbers. He has no idea what is going on around him any more. Time he moved on - to Brazil?
Andrew Borg-Cardona
Nov 9th 2012, 17:17
Listen, if you can't make intelligent comments, don't make any... be critical all you like, but do please try to be less gauche all the time.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Nov 9th 2012, 21:53
Oh dear, ANdrew is being gauche. So much for a free Malta under Gonzi PM. You cannot even be gauche. How about using words like clumsy? WHo is being gauche I wonder?
Please choose the reason of your report below: