Women are their own worst enemies
In the past 15 general elections in Malta thousands of men have contested, but only 73 women.
Malta ranks a sad 108th in the world for female participation in parliament
Only 6 out of 69 members of parliament are female – with the world’s average at 19.4%, Malta’s is a pitiable 8.7%.
86.5% of EU board members are men.
97% of board members in Malta are men.
60% of new graduates in the EU and, in Malta are women.
When they first start out, men and women work in different fields starting off roughly in equal numbers.
The higher women go up in the corporate ladder, the more of them drop out, to the point that we’re almost non-existent where it matters most - at the top.
A year ago EU Justice Commission Viviane Reding invited publicly listed firms in the EU to sign a pledge to voluntarily increase the proportion of women on their boards to 30% by 2015.
To date, only 25 firms have signed the pledge.
France has a 20% gender quota for corporate boards.
In just over a year this has taken the number of women on French boards from 12% to 22%.
Ten years ago Norway, which is not a member of the EU, introduced a 40% quota.
This took women from 9% in 2003 to the required 40% now.
None of the women in the above mentioned countries have reported any bullying or unfair treatment for having quota-ed their way to the top.
On the other hand, many, many women in Malta are still being accused of sleeping their way to the middle.
None of the companies who have had to adhere to the obligatory quotas have had to throw in the towel.
On the contrary research has shown that gender diverse boards are integral to better financial performance.
And yet, despite all this screaming proof that quotas work, and despite the blatant evidence that quotas don’t translate into having unqualified women fill posts instead of qualified men, most women are still against them.
Just last week EU Justice Commission Viviane Reding had to give up on her plans to introduce obligatory gender quotas across the EU, because nearly all the nine EU female Commissioners opposed it.
We keep saying that quotas are not the solution and that they are not the best way forward and yet, no one has come up with anything that could readdress this unfair imbalance - an imbalance that is based solely on the fact that women own uteruses and tend to make good use of them at the peak of their careers.
We’ve tried introducing family friendly measures, we’ve tried voluntary quotas, we’ve tried educating, we’ve tried legislating, and yet, years and years later, the numbers speak for themselves, and in essence, all they can say to date is ‘pathetic’.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Maria Borg
Nov 3rd 2012, 10:14
If gender balanced boards produce better financial results then why big private companies don't rush to introduce gender quotas voluntary? Or are we to believe that private companies are more interested in keeping women away rather than maximizing the financial profits of the company? Who would believe that?
Ramon Casha
Oct 30th 2012, 16:15
Indeed quotas are not the solution - and can even be detrimental. If companies are forced to have 40% of their boards made up of female members, then the female board members are more likely to be seen as fillers - there only to make up the requisite numbers. Such measures produce superficial results today.
O Galea
Oct 30th 2012, 16:02
i'm a woman & nothing irritates me more than trying to get hold of an official in a govt. dept. or similar only to be told by a receptionist that " sorry, dik bir-ridjuzd". or worse still she's not there coz she works from home. Family friendly measures are great but NOT if you hold a decision making position. Have your career but be prepared to put in the hours AT WORK where you can be reached
J Farrugia
Oct 30th 2012, 14:38
Well if Dolores Cristina and Giovanna Debono are anything to go by thank god we have so few.
Maria Borg
Oct 30th 2012, 14:14
"On the contrary research has shown that gender diverse boards are integral to better financial performance."
Oh I see, so you would like us to believe that financial performance requires both genders, but the rearing of children does not require gender diverse parenting. What else you would like us to believe in next, in the invisibile pink unicorn? haha
Mario Grech
Oct 31st 2012, 19:09
It takes a whole village to raise a child Maria.
Janet Bayes
Oct 30th 2012, 11:27
I would not wonder that one could juggle the stats to make them read the opposite.
As for women being their own worst enemy - - that is quite true. I would not be expecting to still feed and care for my adult children even if they lived close to me.
Peter Murray
Oct 30th 2012, 10:09
Women are their own enemies as they don't trust other women and are very competitive towards each other -but not so much towards men!Women in general are far too intelligent to get involved in politics and, in any event ,are mostly far too indecisive to succeed in this field.Also obligatory quotas solely for women should never be allowed as where will it end.What about minority groups representation
Tanja Cilia
Oct 30th 2012, 09:39
I have been saying this for ages - ever since it dawned on me that there was such as statement as "you have a nice face for radio..."
P Pace Balzan
Oct 30th 2012, 09:31
Contest the elections and the statistics will improve!
Please choose the reason of your report below: