Advert

Art collector turns to private sector to show his paintings

Video: Darrin Zammit Lupi

Polish art collector Zdzislaw Bieganski has turned to the private sector to help exhibit his 2,000-odd paintings after the Government found that a number of them may not be genuine.

Culture Ministry officials have been cataloguing Mr Bieganski’s collection for several months. But indications that some of the more famous pieces have not passed preliminary authenticity tests have reportedly led the officials to have cold feet.

“It seems the Government is only interested in the big-name paintings but I never cared who painted what or how much any single painting was worth. I am a collector, not a merchant. To hell with the money,” Mr Bieganski, 92, said emphatically.

He plans to leave his enormous collection to the self-named Bieganski Foundation, which would then display the pieces perman-ently in Malta.

The collection includes authenticated pieces by Pierre-Auguste Rénoir, Emile Bernard, Franci Picabbia, Henri Gaudier-Brzeska, Henry Cheffer and Marcel Cosson among hundreds of others, many of which have yet to be shipped to Malta and catalogued.

It also includes one of the largest known collections of Maltese art, with works by Gabriel Caruana, Pawl Carbonaro, Joe Genovese and Andrew Diacono running into the hundreds.

Foundation curator Ryan Pillow said they were disappointed with the way collaboration between them and the Government had soured in the recent past.

“Our vision was to create a museum to inspire up-and-coming artists, not a tourist magnet with big names plastered on the entrance.

“But I suppose we had different ideas...” he tailed off.

Culture Ministry officials have said it was too early to say whether they felt the Bieganski collection merited exhibition, and have reserved judgement until their cataloguing exercise has been completed.

But with Mr Pillow saying they had not heard from the authorities in “over eight weeks”, the found-ation is now looking at alternative ways of exhibiting the collection through private-sector support.

Mr Pillow was especially irked by the way in which the authorities had sought to verify paintings. “Not a single expert analysed a painting in the flesh. They were all sent digital photos snapped by two local analysts. All you can tell from a photograph is whether or not a painting is part of an artist’s established catalogue.

“All throughout, the perception was: ‘If it’s not a big-name painting, then we’re not interested ’. There are 2,000 paintings in the collection and well over 90 per cent are definitely authentic... But artistic merit isn’t measured in dollars or euros. Many of these paintings are marvellous works of art in themselves.”

Mr Bieganski reflected on the past months. “I think the Government had high hopes when it started assessing my collection. But I never offered them anything which I had doubts about.”

He shifted in his chair. “I have to face the facts. I am old and I will die. This collection has given me joy for over 50 years and I want to share that. But I am interested in art, not names. And art is about soul and beauty, not money.”

Advert

21 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joe Galea

Oct 27th 2012, 20:37

Couldn't these experts have been so convinced and the works so clearly not what they were proposed to be that they could be immediately dismissed ? I would not be surprised given Mr Bieganski's opinion about art.

Giuseppe Azzopardi

Oct 28th 2012, 08:29

Mr Galea if it is like you say that these paintings are a copy or total fakes then the experts should have said so from the first glimpse of the artifacts.Then it depends on what criteria you are evaluating these paintings.Is it how much they would fetch or simply for the pleasure of having a good painting and it stops there?It is not worth it to invest in housing 2000 paintings and no masterpiece

Ryan Pillow

Oct 27th 2012, 16:43

Dear Mr. Mifsud as curator of this collection I can guarantee you that Mr. B has the sole intention of displaying his collection for the benefit of the young up and coming artists and all art lovers. When Mr. B quotes " who cares who they were " he would be simply stating that, you don't have to be a world class artist and hold a high price on the international art market to be worthy for a spot.

Mr Evan Camilleri

Oct 27th 2012, 13:31

?!?!?! And let them rot in some millionaire's villa? better for them to be enjoyed by everyone

Eric Camilleri (Q)

Oct 27th 2012, 14:28

The art pieces are Mr Bieganski's property and he is rightly so not letting go of them. So from where did you get the idea of an auction or a donation ? He is not donating or giving them to anyone. His demand is for the Maltese Government to provide him with prime exhibiting space on a permanent basis. But it seems more complex than it looks, thus the impasse.

Joe Galea

Oct 27th 2012, 20:41

I did get to see a selection of works from this collection displayed at the National Library. Not impressed at all .. I don't blame Government at all for taking its time.

Advert
Advert