Advert

Updated - Dalli: This was a plan of entrapment, company denial

John Dalli, the former EU Health Commissioner, has provided some details of two meetings mentioned yesterday by Giovanni Kessler, the director general of the EU's anti-fraud office (Olaf).

He also claimed that what was happening showed a plan of entrapment against him - a claim which was promptly denied by Swedish Match, the company which raised the whole issue with the European Commission.

Mr Dalli said he attempted to send this reply via e-mail yesterday, but was unsuccessful. In the e-mail, he says he met a Snus lobbyist in 2010 and an unnamed Maltese lawyer in 2012. He says these were the meetings Mr Kessler referred to as the one centring around his investigation. He also implies that the meetings were organised by businessman Silvio Zammit.

However, yesterday morning, Mr Dalli said Mr Zammit "never asked me for any meeting with these people". He was referring to Snus lobbyists, who he claims attempted to "bribe" Mr Zammit in March by asking him how much he would charge to set up an informal meeting.

In today's reply he qualifies his statement, saying it was the offer made in March that was "never communicated" to him.

The e-mail he was referring to was sent by the European Smokeless Tobacco Council, which is chaired by the spokesman of Swedish Match, the company that reported Mr Dalli to the European Commission in May.

...There are other issues, which will be brought up at the appropriate time, that show a systematic plan of entrapment

Mr Dalli also claims that the "Snus people" made another request by phone on July 3, after filing their complaint. He does not say how he got to know about this phone call or the e-mail that was addressed to Mr Zammit.

Mr Dalli also says there are other issues which will brought up at the appropriate time that show "a systematic plan of entrapment."

This is Mr Dalli's explanation, in his own words:

"It is important that we put things in perspective.

The "dealings" between the Snus people and the Maltese entrepreneur seem to have started in March of this year, after I had finalised my policy on the tobacco directive with SANCO, the services responsible for health and consumers which was in February this year.

The meetings that Kessler referred to were held one in August 2010 with a lobbyist who simply handed me some reports from Price Waterhouse about tobacco, and one on 6th January 2012 with a Maltese lawyer who wanted to know the Commission position on SNUS – which I explained. If you watched the press conference given at the commission at midday today, you could hear the journalists say that this is common practice with most commissioners.

During that time I was in listning mode on this issue, analysing all information and preparing my position.

The proof that these meetings did not influence the decisions taken by myself and SANCO is the email which was published this morning (yesterday) by Malta Today, sent by the SNUS organisation on the 16th March which stated that they were hearing disturbing rumours and were offering a bribe to have a meeting organised with me. This offer was never communicated to me.

I am also informed that the SNUS people again made the same request by phone around the 3rd of July, when they had already made their complaint (25th May) and when OLAF had already started its investigations. It is obvious that they did not succeed to get at me after many attempts.

I have repeatedly stated to OLAF that I did not discuss SNUS with the Maltese Entrepreneur after the 6th of January.

The Director General of OLAF kept insisting on his conclusions based on circumstantial evidence that I was aware of the dealings that were going on. This is simply conjecture on his part which will not stand the test of serious study. I have categorically declared several times that I was not aware of these goings on.

As to my the email that was published, it came into my hands weeks after I had an interview with OLAF in which THEY informed me of what was going on. It is also interesting to note that the Director General of OLAF stated that he did not know about this email. I ask, what due diligence did he perform on the SNUS organisation who made the complaint?

It is not the independent fact of this email, there are other issues which will be brought up at the appropriate time that show a systematic plan of entrapment."

SWEDISH MATCH DENIES ENTRAPMENT

Swedish MatCh in a statement denied the claims of entrapment and said that all it had done was report to the European Authorities an offer which should not have been made to it.

It said that according to its code of conduct it was bound to report anything which could expose it to an illegality.

Advert

96 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

C Muscat

Oct 19th 2012, 09:04

I agree with you Eddy Privitera and prosit to be maltese first and foremost.
Have Swedish Match according to their code of conduct informed the eu of this email offering bribes.
Why did Barroso sent away Dally and shelved again the anti tobacco directive???!!!

m farrugia

Oct 18th 2012, 22:32

dan ir ragel kemm il frame up ha jsofri miskin. jekk mhux sejjer zball dan diga it tielet frame up

kif jghidu il qasba ma iccaqcaqx ta xejn. U minn fuq hadha kontra gonzi meta dan nehhieh minn ministru sakemm saru l-investigazzjoniet tax-xiri ta air tickets minghand travel agency ta bintu mill ministeru tal foreign affairs, x'ippretenda li ma jsirux investigazzjoniet fuq allegazzjoni?

Joe Calleja

Oct 18th 2012, 18:30

I fully agree.

M Borg

Oct 18th 2012, 16:35

If nothing is clear why did he resign ?

. Could he not have stayed on and ask to see the evidence?



Eddy Privitera

Oct 18th 2012, 16:49

M. Borg: Because Barroso asked him to resign.

Joseph Brincat

Oct 18th 2012, 16:50

M Borg
@ If nothing is clear why did he resign ?
They made him resign M. Borg !!

ANTHONY PAVIA

Oct 18th 2012, 16:55

Didn't you know that Machiavelli was conceived in Malta?

Carmel Camilleri

Oct 18th 2012, 17:09

@M Borg. John did not resign on his own free will. He was forced to resign by Barosos

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 18th 2012, 17:27

@ M Borg

Not if Barroso held a gun at Dalli's head forcing him to resign within the hour without consulting his lawyers and family, or be fired peremptorily.

victor bonello

Oct 18th 2012, 17:27

@M.borg - because in all civilised and democratic countries ( unlike in Malta) that is what one dies when hs trust is put at question.

G G Debono

Oct 18th 2012, 18:01

To M Borg .........Today, 16:35
RE If nothing is clear why did he resign ?

Because that's the decent thing to do ! ---and one can fight an injustice better .

And that's what our politicians are mostly afraid to do !

M Borg

Oct 18th 2012, 20:36

@ all

Sorry I do not agree with all of you. I would have stayed on and fight to prove that I did nothing wrong.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 18th 2012, 16:27

@ Leo Briffa
We do not "worry for him" (Dalli). We worry for the international reputation of Malta, of its citizens and of the prime minister who chose him to represent us abroad.

Mr Stephen Borg

Oct 18th 2012, 16:28

Well said, you couldn't have put it better and then they say that they are there to serve the people, I am sure that those with a little bit of grey matter above their eyes can comprehend that where politicians are involved it is the people who serve them.

M Borg

Oct 18th 2012, 16:39

What has what he gets monthly got to do with all this ?

Why ruin a man if he did nothing wrong ?

Eddy Privitera

Oct 18th 2012, 16:52

Francis and Stephen: Don'y you think you are already condemning Mr. Dalli before he has had a chance to prove his innocence ?

Robert Agius

Oct 18th 2012, 17:08

Well, Leo, most of the famous people today are crap but look at ho much they get paid....just sayin'

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 18th 2012, 17:52

@EddyPrivitera
No! I am not condemning Dalli.
I am criticising the Swedish tobacco lobby and OLAF for furthering its agenda. Also, I am putting up a defence for the international reputation of Malta because the case against its ambassador is suspiciously weak and based on circumstantial evidence, if you can call it that.

m farrugia

Oct 18th 2012, 21:55

or perhaps because he was appearing on one tv's bla agenda every week ixewwex? is this an eu commissioner's job????

Charles Sammut

Oct 18th 2012, 16:42

...and what if Johnnie came out guilty in court?!?..what then, would he go to Corradino?!?
Another case of smoke without fire for which Maltese politicians and their friends of friends are very well known in creating!

...and the beat goes on...and the beat goes on....

GL Calleja

Oct 18th 2012, 16:11

If there is a smell in the air that means there are dead fish around. Let John Dalli prove his innocence and then move on to the next scandal. Is Malta such a corrupt country as they say it is? Not a nice thing to be proud of, is it? Two Maltese EU Meps resigned with in a couple of months? One being Cachia Caruana and now John Dalli? What is going on Dr Gonzi?

victor bonello

Oct 18th 2012, 17:31

GL Calleja- I thought everyone is presumed innocent until proved guilty. Yet you have already condemned J.Dalli saying " let John Dalli prove his innocence ". Where did you gt this mentality?

G G Debono

Oct 18th 2012, 15:06

..... and free publicity too !

Mr Duncan Scerri

Oct 18th 2012, 15:15

Works the other way. The restrictions are already in place. The new policy might have removed them.

Charles Sammut

Oct 18th 2012, 16:45

ermm.. the PN does NOT Need Johnnie...Simon is here and he is the one who will save the PN from certain defeat at the Polls....

...and the beat goes on...and the beat goes on....

m farrugia

Oct 18th 2012, 22:05

we surely cannot consider mr dalli to be a nationalist any more with his weekly shows on hamilton's bla agenda on one tv

how can one stoop so low and is this allowed by the EU, do commissioners get paid 500.000 a year to spend their weekends criticising their country's pm just because he lost the leadership race to gonzi.

u dan miskin diga xi tlett darbiet gie investigat u sabuh innocenti

Charles Grixti

Oct 18th 2012, 16:14

That is what I say to. This is institutionalised corruption. Wow. the EU is getting to be just like the USA.

Franco Attard Trevisan

Oct 18th 2012, 15:12

Same here....

Mr Duncan Scerri

Oct 18th 2012, 15:19

Wikileaks is global.

Edgar Gatt

Oct 18th 2012, 15:22

Mario, there is no need to get rid of Mr. Dalli politically. His political life has ended years ago and his only place is on One TV.

Eddy Privitera

Oct 18th 2012, 22:12

Edgar Gatt. Don't you know that Net TV never invites John Dalli ? This was said by Mr. Dalli !

Anthony Scicluna

Oct 18th 2012, 15:11

You don't "pretend", you expect

Ethelbert Schembri

Oct 18th 2012, 17:27

NO !! I pretend that justice is to be done !!

Anthony Psaila

Oct 18th 2012, 13:12

taf li qed nemmnek!

Victor Caruana

Oct 18th 2012, 13:22

I agree with you 100% Mr Sammut, I also have same views

M Farrugia

Oct 18th 2012, 13:53

Paul, lanqas li kieku kont tkum u torqod kuljum ma John dalli ma tista taghmel statement bhal dan. Jiena qabel jkun hemm rizultt finali ta dak kollu li gara ma nikkundanna lil hadd. Dan l-ahhar John Dalli jekk mhux zb aljat kellu ukoll xi kwistjoni ma xi ghaqda tal-animali mill-germanja li zammet konferenza hawn Malta fejn allegat li JOhn dalli kien qieghed jigbed. Dan allura komplot?

C Muscat

Oct 18th 2012, 14:29

I agree 100%.
I would like to add that as a Maltese citizen against EU membership I have been right all the way. We have been reduced to a local bar.

Alexander Montebello

Oct 18th 2012, 14:35

.. And of course you come to your high-handed conclusion because you conducted your own detailed private investigation and have counter evidence proving that Dalli is just an innocent scapegoat, right?

Paul Portelli

Oct 18th 2012, 14:17

Have you seen what Mr Bondi asked? He asked whether there was any evidence on which OLAF based their report and pressed why OLAF was only acting on circumstantial evidence. It was a legitimate question. But obviously those with red blinkers, who recently started seeing Dalli as an angel, are really seeing red!

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 18th 2012, 12:45

Let us pray that it is only a case of OLAF swallowing it all. Hook, Line and Sinker - and nothing worse.

M Farrugia

Oct 18th 2012, 13:56

Jekk OLAF jibla dak li qed jghid allura Baroso ghandu itajjar lilu u lil kun min huwa involut fl-inkjesta

Brian Gatt

Oct 18th 2012, 15:06

Why Dr Saliba you think there was someone local involved apart from the mentioned buisnessman?

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 18th 2012, 16:34

@BrianGatt.

No, thank you. I am capable of making myself understood by the intelligent, without any need for distorting elaborations and questions from those who pretend to be obtuse.

Anthony Psaila

Oct 18th 2012, 13:13

I always look forward to your comments. JB the best! Ghandek x'taghmel ghas-sena li gejja ?? qed infittxu kummissjaru...

Alexander Montebello

Oct 18th 2012, 14:44

You seriously think that barosso and Kessler would just throw allegations around without having done all the ground work before?
Dalli has known of the investigation since July 11th. Why didn't he tell anyone - not even the PM - that he was under investigation?
Instead he makes wild allegations the next day that his email had been hacked .Seems like a massive smokescreen to me.

Charles Cremona

Oct 18th 2012, 12:32

I totally agree with you Anthony, this is either a case of a serious error of judgment by Dalli or their is more to it than he is admitting to, in any case it is not doing Malta and its good name any favours in the corridors of Brussels. First there was the Dolores Cristina affair and now this.

Advert
Advert