Communications Authority gets new chairman

John Doe

Oct 18th 2012, 20:30

You don't really have a good understanding, it seems, Mr./Ms. Pisani. The "EU people", as you call them, were squarely against ACTA.

However, ACTA apart, don't you think there's something fishy in an appointment of a chairman who happens to work in a private law firm (this is no longer a Board Member, remember, but the chairman)?

John Doe

Oct 18th 2012, 20:31

You don't really have a good understanding, it seems, Mr./Ms. Pisani. The "EU people", as you call them, were squarely against ACTA.

However, ACTA apart, don't you think there's something fishy in an appointment of a chairman who happens to work in a private law firm (this is no longer a Board Member, remember, but the chairman)?

John Doe

Oct 18th 2012, 20:35

You don't really have a good understanding, it seems, Mr./Ms. Pisani. The "EU people", as you call them, were squarely against ACTA.

However, ACTA apart, don't you think there's something fishy in an appointment of a chairman who happens to work in a private law firm (this is no longer a Board Member, remember, but the chairman)?

John Doe

Oct 18th 2012, 16:25

It's very good to see you so convinced, because I am not convinced at all by this decision.

Dr. Ghio was one of the most ardent proponents of the ACTA, on account of which he should not have been given the post. He will also have a clear conflict of interest if he retains his position at Fenech and Fenech.

I would have loved to see a fresh face leading the MCA rather than a stale one.

Peter Murray

Oct 18th 2012, 11:27

Sorry but I have scoured the Maltese lexicon and cannot locate this term as applicable in Malta.