Enemalta confirms damage to steam turbine
‘Parts fell off during test run, sucked into turbine’
Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
Enemalta has confirmed that a new steam turbine at the Delimara power station extension has been damaged and the case is being investigated.
The damage was first revealed by Labour MP Joe Mizzi in Parliament on Tuesday evening when he also submitted photos of the damage.
The energy company said engineers from BWSC, the company that installed the new power station, were looking into the damage which was caused after a strainer installed in front of the turbine got dislodged.
“Some of these parts also passed into the steam turbine causing foreign object damage, which is currently being investigated by the manufacturer,” Enemalta said in a statement.
The damage happened after commissioning and reliability tests were completed. The power station has not yet passed to Enemalta pending a final round of tests.
Earlier this month while visiting the power plant, Finance Minister Tonio Fenech said Enemalta would be officially taking over the facility by the end of October.
Enemalta said “preparations” were being made by BWSC to make good for the damage in the shortest time possible.
“It has to be noted that all the plant is still under the responsibility of BWSC and they will have to rectify the damage at their expense. Enemalta has already sought legal advice on how to safeguard its interests,” the corporation said.
In a scathing speech during the adjournment, Mr Mizzi said the turbine was damaged during trial runs, while the emissions control mechanism was also leaking.
He said some parts had broken off during a test run and were sucked into the steam turbine. The turbine was opened on Monday, when the damage was confirmed.
Mr Mizzi said that contrary to what Mr Fenech had said, the extension was not going through a full power run, since four of the engines were switched off during the night.
He also asked if independent experts had been engaged to verify whether BWSC was adhering to its contractual obligations and whether the authorities were satisfied both with the reliability of the plant and its emissions control.
Enemalta explained it was not the intention of the tests to operate the plant continuously at full load. The plant was designed to operate on a start and stop basis, it added, in order to optimise the operating efficiency while meeting the varying daily load demand.
“This process is inherently more demanding than continuous operations.
“It is part of the normal procedure that whenever generating units are shut down routine checks and maintenance are carried out,” Enemalta said.
The company denied there were sulphur emissions from the plant resulting in a health hazard to the personnel on site.
However, it confirmed there were “minor discharges of sodium bicarbonate”, known as baking powder, which was used in the fuel cleaning process. It denied there were problems with the abatement system.
“These faults are being corrected and the faulty valves are being replaced or modified. These discharges have nothing to do with the fault on the steam turbine,” Enemalta said.
On the engagement of independent experts requested by Mr Mizzi, Enemalta said it had sufficient in-house expertise to properly supervise the reliability and performance tests of the new plant.
The company said the plant was operational and the combined electrical output was of 136MW.
12 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr John Borg
Oct 18th 2012, 12:27
One question:
How does an MP get to know about the damage, yet Enemalta (the owner of the machinery) had to conduct an investigation to get to know about it?
I would imagine Enemalta should be the one to know first? Or did the worker in charge of it know and never reported it to management?
Borg Joseph
Oct 18th 2012, 10:45
to C.Cassar
in Malta there are some excellent engineers and technicians who can stand up with any form of technology. Would you comment on ALL Mater Dei doctors or nurses via a blanket judgement like you did because someone dies in an operating theatre? Also, if you read carefully, BWSC, a foreign company with foreign engineers & technicians, is being kept liable for the damage.
aldo Attard
Oct 18th 2012, 10:44
What is the power of this auxiliary turbine?
Does it operate on the exhaust gas boilers only? And can it make full use of all the waist exhausts of the 8 in No Int. Comb. engines?
So I gather that whole extension was not intended for continuous running!
Then how is it to going replace the Marsa Power station?
Edward Mallia
Oct 18th 2012, 12:17
Steam turbine gives just 10MW; it may well need all the exhaust from the 8 piston engines to give 10MW; but it is not a vital part of the P.S. Extension.
On the other hand, the combined cycle "gas" turbine in 'old' Delimara has two 37MW 'gas' turbines burning diesel; using their exhaust enough steam is raised to run a 37MW steam turbine. The combination delivers 110MW.
aldo Attard
Oct 18th 2012, 13:25
Thank you Mr Edward Mallia for the information.
Most kind.
C Cassar
Oct 18th 2012, 10:23
Any systems using modern technology must be run and administered by foreign experts. The Maltese don't have any aptitude or understanding of these things as demonstrated here and in many other disasters over the years.
ray vassallo
Oct 18th 2012, 11:15
@C.Cassar:
If you read the article, you would notice that the Dellimara extension is still under BWSC's responsibilty and therefore has nothing to do with the loss of aptitude and understanding of Maltese engineers! You have no idea about the capability of local engineers. They were always up to the tasks when new technology was introduced! And what other disasters are you talking about?
R. Farrugia
Oct 18th 2012, 11:32
Please base your arguments on solid facts without twisting reality Mr. Cassar. In most occasions the few disasters that happened in the country could be traced to negligence of individuals. We have many more than capable engineers and technicians and I've WITNESSED myself such, meeting and exceeding foreigners' competence both locally and abroad! - Cannot name any due to the 400 char. at my dis.
Edward Mallia
Oct 18th 2012, 12:46
Mercaptan 'disposal'; stopping of Marsa precipitators; two yellow cloud episodes; sodium bicarbonate spill; damage to steam turbine. People on top of their work?
But what if Enemalta engineers take 'political orders' which make them look like fools? One instance: In the IPPC permit application the new engines were to be run 24hrs/day for 240 days: an engineering impossibility. Why make it?
Edward Mallia
Oct 18th 2012, 09:44
Sodium bicarbonate is used to remove SO2 from chimney gases. It is expensively imported in large quantities. Unless it was being administered to Enemalta and BWSC operatives suffering from tummy ache, its presence indicated malfunction of the de-SO2 system, just as the yellow-orange clouds for the de-NOx system. I doubt whether inhalation of bicarbonate dust does any good to the workers' lungs.
victor bonello
Oct 18th 2012, 11:29
are you sure this particular plant uses Sodium bicarbonate? from what know it uses UREA which is far more costly and dangerous and baking soda.
Edward Mallia
Oct 18th 2012, 12:52
Urea is used to treat the Nitrogen Oxides in the exhaust; excess urea -- from a heavy handed operator -- provided the yellow/orange colour in those magnificent clouds. Sodium bicarbonate is intended to remove Sulphur Oxides. The above information has been in the public domain for a long time now.
Please choose the reason of your report below: