Stuck in lift for more than three hours at St Vincent de Paul Home
St Vincent de Paule Home
The authorities of St Vincent de Paul Home for the elderly have ordered an inquiry after five visitors were stuck in a lift at the home for more than three-and-a-half hours yesterday.
The Secretariat for the Elderly said the lift stuck between the second and the third floors of the Serenity Ward at 5.45 p.m. and the five people in it were rescued at 9.10 p.m.
The lift can carry up to 400 kilos and the indications were that it was overloaded and as a result the emergency brake kicked in, the secretariat said.
The ward staff immediately alerted the maintenance team and the lift installers along with members of the Civil Protection Department.
The rescue operation was an elaborate one, with the rescuers having to set up chain blocks in order to lower the lift cabin.
Contact was maintained with the passengers, who were never in any danger. Fans were set up to ventilate the lift once its door was opened during the operation.
The Home said the lift is maintained regularly. A board of inquiry has been appointed.
49 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
D. Scicluna
Oct 8th 2012, 18:19
I can`t believe that five persons can be more than 400 kilos. If the maximum lift weight is 400 kilos its sure that it will stop within 450 or more kilos.
Christopher Bianco
Oct 8th 2012, 18:47
and if most of them were over weight??
ANTHONY PAVIA
Oct 8th 2012, 14:53
Lift maximum 400kgs. Persons aboard 5. I do not see any overloading. I sense poor maintenance and sloppy upkeep as is the case in whatever Government undertakes.
Vanessa-clair Farrugia
Oct 8th 2012, 21:16
Mr Pavia, depends on the size of the passengers. Five women weighing 50kgs each would weigh in at a total of 250kg, five bodybuilders weighing in at 100kgs each would total 500kgs. Five obese persons, weighing in at 100kgs each would as well total 500kgs. Do the maths. Now in Malta there are far more obese people, than there are bodybuilders...
Mrs Maria Rosaria Brincat
Oct 8th 2012, 14:39
Ive I get stuck for 3.5 hrs in a lift I would certainly die cause I m claustrophobic and I get a panic attack when Im confined to small places. This should never have happened, keeping people closed in a lift for that long. Where were the maintenance people? DISGRACE. I strongly advice the people who got stuck to sue who ever was responsible.
John Cassar
Oct 8th 2012, 14:03
Hasra li ma jehilx b'dawlk li huma responsabbli mit-tmexxija tal-Ministeru tas-Sahha halli jkunu jafu xi tfisser maghluq go gagga bi ftit arja mnizza. Fejn huwa s-Segretarju Parlamentari responsabbli minn St. Vincent de Paul. Issa nistennew xi skuza banali biex jattu dnubithom.
Sahha.
Ronnie Callus
Oct 8th 2012, 13:18
How come that a cabin lift is lowered by chain blocks ?? As far as I know this has to be done from the pump room of the lift. Is this lift being certified as up to standard, and by whom ?????
Michael Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 16:35
The car safety gear on hydraulic lifts stops the car from moving downwards. Attempts at lowering the car cause the brake to increase its grip on the guide rails. The brake is released by manually pumping the lift car upwards.
Hydraulic lifts installed from July 2002 onwards must, by law, include this apparatus as also a valve for lowering the lift car where conditions so require. Lifts installed before that date, while including the manual valve, did not necessarily include the 'hand-pump' to move the car upwards as there was no regulation in place stipulating its inclusion.
Where the hand-pump is absent, chain blocks must be used to move the car upwards to release the grip of the safety break and to raise the car far enough to enable trapped persons to exit.
Joseph Rapinett
Oct 8th 2012, 12:05
Are the Secretariat Authorities contemplating charges against the administrative staff as was the intention some years back when one A/C went faulty
Peter Shaw
Oct 8th 2012, 11:54
Lift safety standards must be lifted (pun intended) higher !
Joseph N. Attard
Oct 8th 2012, 11:38
It should never take so long to lower a stuck lift. Chainblocks? Then most probably it was not just overload. Lifts can always be lowered manually from the engine room down to the next level. How old is the lift, by the way? Has it been recently certified as safe according to law?
Joe Naudi
Oct 8th 2012, 11:20
Hi The Home stated that the lift is maintained regularly, how often once a month or once a week. Remember that the lift is used constantly by the elderly at St Vincent De Paul home and need to be checked every day. I am sure that they have a permanent maintenance person working there. Joe P
B Attard
Oct 8th 2012, 11:18
xejn gdid il-lifts ta San Viuncenz spiss bil-hsara.
Paul Bajada
Oct 8th 2012, 11:18
SmartMalta 2012! This government can't even afford to service hospital lifts adequately, let alone solve the country's problems.
paul camilleri
Oct 8th 2012, 13:57
Mr Bajada , either you dont know how to read or your to SMART to understand .. " THE LIFT IS MAINTAINED REGULARY"
jason cassar
Oct 8th 2012, 11:10
A well-maintained up to standard lift will not close doors if overloaded , but anyway i dont want to sound too much technical but 3.5 hrs is a total disgrace
Corinne Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 15:35
Posted o.b.o Malta Lift Association www.mla.org.mt
Lift regulations (L. R. 2002) state that new lift installations should include a car overload device to stop the lift moving if it is overloaded. This pre-empts the lift car from getting stuck between floor levels due to overloading. The regulations also state that new lift installations should include the means of manually pumping a lift car upwards to the next floor level. This means that the lift's safety brake still protects lift users in case of, say, a malfunctioning or improperly set car-overload device but qualified personnel can then manually operate the lift to enable users to exit safely. The safety mechanisms (car overload device, manual override) and relevant equipment are *compulsory* in all vertical passenger lift installations dating from July 2002.
Iris Baitrman
Oct 8th 2012, 10:56
Thats terrible for an old people's home, we are from Manchester and the first month in Malta i remember we were stuck in a lift believe or not in one of the government's buildings in Valletta, knocking on the very tiny hole, with no AC, stuffling and rather frustrating as i needed to go to the loo urgently, after about 20 mins, some guy came along with a crow bar and manage to let us out. i think the Maltese ought to get themselves proper and professional engineers to maintain these doddgy lifts, preferably British and BA standard, as it seems any other foreign make mainly Italian cheap ruubish same as clothing from small outlets are waste of time and a waste of money.
Desmond Mangion
Oct 8th 2012, 13:35
So what you are saying is that, if its British it will never breakdown . i m in Wales right now writing this commet on a bus which broke down 1hr 20mins ago, still not fixed. British ? no thanks
Corinne Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 16:01
Posted o.b.o Malta Lift Association www.mla.org.mt
Passenger lift safety in Malta is governed by regulations (Lifts Regulations, Machinery Regulations, Product Safety Act) that adopt EU safety standards. The provenance of lift equipment alone is not considered to be a sufficient indicator of its safety. When sourcing lift equipment, lift suppliers are legally obliged to ensure that the equipment meets regulatory safety standards, regardless of its provenance.
So lift equipment which meets safety standards and is sourced from, say, Italy, is deemed to be in line with safety regulations, whereas lift equipment sourced from, say, Britain, which does not meet regulatory requirements for safety, is not deemed safe.
Elaine Sultana
Oct 8th 2012, 22:00
If you are from Manchester, you must have travelled via Manchester Airport sometime, though perhaps not recently. I am a Maltese living in the North of England who uses this airport very regularly and as I am slightly claustrophobic, I feel very nervous using the lifts there as I have been stuck inside them twice, not for 3 hours, but just long enough to get into a panic: the lifts are ancient; we passengers get into these lifts gingerly and grin at one another as they crank themselves up - and open very slowly. They are very likely standard British make. As for the Airport exterior, that is a disaster..... an embarrassment not only to Mancunians but to the UK generally - slabs of shabby, broken concrete have turned the airport into a maze.... It is hard to get into the right lane for the terminal(s) you need and this has been the case for about 18 months.
Elaine Sultana, Blackburn, England
Corinne Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 22:19
Posted o.b.o. Malta Lift Association www.mla.org.mt
It should be noted that, in addition to adopting EU safety standards, regulations governing lift safety in Malta - i.e. Product Safety Act (2001), Lifts Regulations (2002), Inspection of Lifts Regulations (2007), Machinery Regulations (2009) - transpose EU Directives relating to lift safety.
Joseph Micallef
Oct 8th 2012, 10:10
Shame, simply unacceptable. Who is going to bear responsibility for this? Who is going to resign?
Dom.J. Bugejja
Oct 8th 2012, 18:55
Corinne Vella> Whats so good about British standard, only in theory but in practice most British standard equipment is deemed as crap as far as i am concern.
E. De Marco
Oct 8th 2012, 09:57
Three and a half-hours to be rescued? Is this another Guinness World record?
Michael Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 20:24
@ Dom. J. Bugejja. European Standards apply to all countries forming part of the EU, including Britain. British Standards are essentially European Standards transposed into the British regulatory structure, in the same way that European Standards were transposed into Malta's National Standards, and as was similarly done in the rest of EU countries. No product may be placed on the market anywhere in the EU unless the product conforms to the relevant EU standard. In the case of passenger lifts the standard is EN.81.
Daniel Dimech
Oct 8th 2012, 09:55
kieku overload ma jahdimx minn qabel nimmagina ....boqq qedin fit 2012
Peter Murray
Oct 8th 2012, 09:07
My good Lord !How fat are we getting if 5 people(and I presume these were men and women?) weighed more then 400 kilos - but have they proved this?
Robert Mifsud
Oct 8th 2012, 08:47
Why does such news makes it to Times Of Malta?
JIMMY ATANASIO
Oct 8th 2012, 15:18
why do you even have a newspaper.it's such a small island that every body knows every body's bussiness anyways.but you must all know that shit happens and you shoould follow protocall
paul camilleri
Oct 8th 2012, 08:38
it is obvious that the total weight of 400Kgs is not enough for hospitals basically we are saying 5 people weighing in at 80kgs each would be enough to put the lift at its maximum.imaginge if 5 people at 90 kgs were to go in it at one time then it would overload.
therefore the lift in question has a large space than necessary to hold 400kg to allow it to funtion properly or the winch fitted is to small for weight to space ratio.
therefore this lift if inspected correctly during installation should not have passed its test
Corinne Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 13:33
Posted o.b.o Malta Lift Association www.mla.org.mt
Regulations [L.R. 2002] state that new lift installations are subject to initial inspection by a Notified Body. Initial inspection takes place once the installation is complete and before the lift is formally put to use. The installation can be certified for use only if it meets all established safety criteria, after which the lift should be formally registered with the Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority.
Where bed transport is required - as in care homes or hospitals - cabin space needs to be large enough to accommodate a bed, a patient and accompanying persons. A larger than usual cabin space does not automatically compromise a lift's safe load capacity as this is pre-defined according to use. EU standards (EN.81) apply to lifts in Malta, setting the ratio of a lift’s load capacity to its car floor area. At 2.2 square feet/75Kg, a 400Kg lift should provide space for 5 average-sized people, with some elbow room.
For their own safety and convenience, when entering a lift, passengers should refer to the load capacity displayed inside the lift cabin. The key figure is the Kg rating. The stated number of persons is for guidance only as individuals’ body weight differs.
paul camilleri
Oct 8th 2012, 15:20
@ Corinne Vella
exactly my point , in which case the people going into the lift should of done a mental arithmatic 2 people x 80kg= 160kg 2 people x 120kg =240 kg + 160Kg =400Kg so the fifth person should not of got on but because of the large space a person never reads the total weight load let alone bother in calculations. if they can get in then its ok. this has nothing to do with servicing in fact the lift worked near perfect by breaking. where it did not work perfectly was in calculating the weight before it went on its decent/ascent.
Corinne Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 16:39
Posted o.b.o. Malta Lift Association www.mla.org.mt
A car overload device ordinarily prevents a passenger lift from moving if the lift is overloaded. Not all passenger lifts are fitted with a car overload device and a manual override option (which allows qualified personnel to move the lift car to the next floor level when necessary) as these safety mechanisms became compulsory in July 2002 for new passenger lift installations.
Under Legal Notice 231/2007 “Inspection of Lifts Regulations 2007”, a car overload device and manual override mechanism, along with other safety modifications, are now mandatory in ALL passenger lifts. This is in line with European Standard EN.81-80 (Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts - Existing lifts - Part 80: Rules for the improvement of safety of existing passengers and good passenger lifts).
Car overload devices and manual override mechanisms can be retroactively installed in passenger lifts. IRL.2007 sets different compliance deadlines depending on the year a particular lift was first put to use, allowing lift owners enough time to bring their lift in line with current safety standards.
Kenneth Williams
Oct 8th 2012, 08:13
Dak li tiehu meta ix xol jkun bit tender. Jghazlu l orhos u tiehu ta l irhis. Jien minghalija li meta jieqaf lift jinzel ground floor u jinfetah u meta jkun overloaded l anqad biss jibda jahdem u jdoqq l alarm. Nispera li ssir inkjesta tajba u ma noqodux inwahhlu fil weight.
Chris Borg
Oct 8th 2012, 08:54
andek zball ikrah. Is sistema li qed issemmi int fkas li jinqata id dawl tezisti u mhux meta haqbad il brake jew ikolu xi hsara il lift. Biex ma nparlawx bla sens taparsi nifmu
Franco Farrugia
Oct 8th 2012, 09:52
Agree completely with you. Imagine if they had been senior citizens, residents of the Home.
paul camilleri
Oct 8th 2012, 15:52
Mr Williams
"overloaded l anqas biss jibda jahdem u jdoqq l alarm" this is what you said, this is why a lot of things are going wrong, like car accidents , ignoring of traffic lights, and stop signs , are you waiting for an alarm to go off on those too and then again why bother you would still drive on le???
because this is what you are saying keep on going never mind the excess weight!!!!! go down in a glorious sound of siren blearing
also are you an expert on lifts??? do you know something these readers do not?? one hopes that people begin to show responsibility and not over load a lift just because there is space in it, probably something you do yourself.
Mr C Galea
Oct 8th 2012, 08:08
This maybe is just another typical maltese safety related issue story,only act if we have to, after an incident does happen and not before and so on and so on? Where I live I have had so much trouble about such areas/issues that at the end of the day the only reason i could think of about these rejections of safety related issues take place before an incident happens is just money? Common sense seems not to exit? Concern also does seem to exit? I even heard one person state I don,t go there so I dont care . Sad indeed as this question never seems to come to mind,What if it did happen to me or a member of my family?
Quite Frankly laws must be made tougher and enforceable that is final, and Govts/authorities should be held responsible.
paul camilleri
Oct 8th 2012, 09:34
sir this is a typical Maltese attitude issue if one simply sees the label stating 400Kg max weight and already sees 3 people in it, it does not take a rocket scientist to see that if the 4th and 5th person gets on the lift it would be over loaded!!!
Vanessa-clair Farrugia
Oct 8th 2012, 21:09
Dear Mr Camilleri, depends on the persons inside the lift. If they are of small build, (I'm just shy of 50kgs) the lift can carry 8 such passengers safely. For the obese, unfortunately, they should take the stairs.
paul camilleri
Oct 9th 2012, 08:12
@ Vanessa
Dear Ms Farrugia havent the obese got the same rights as you??? again if you weigh a shy 50kgs and you say 8 people can take the lift i ask you how many times have you riden a lift and had all the people inside the lift with the same or near enough same weight as yourself?? and why 8?? are you in favour of loading it to the max???
as i said this is a typical Maltese attitude if there is space just get in and dont even bother about the weight restrictions
maybe if you counted before and even judged an approximate weight of each individual inside the lift you would say to yourself hhmm there are 4 people in this lift 2 obese about 120Kg each and 1 medium weight 80kg 1 feather weight about your weight that brings in a total of 370kg still in the limits of the lifts weight would you get on?? or would you think twice about it
twanny borg
Oct 8th 2012, 08:02
nitlob li t-times iggib dan il-kumment tieghi li huwa ta' ghajnuna ghal anzjani inkluz familjari tieghi li qieghed f''ward 8 st. joseph tal-irgiel st. vincent de paul. cert li l-familjari kollha jaqblu mieghi. dawn l-anzjani bla lehen. veru li xi whud ghandhom certi problemi ta' dimensja pero din mhux skuza li ma jiegux trattati ta' nies. dawn xi darba kellhom dritt meta jridu johorgu f'bitha zghira quddiem il-bieb biex tidhol f'din is-sala. gara i kien twahhal lift ezatt hdejn il-bieb bil-konsegwenza li dawn ma thallewx aktar johorgu meta jridu u jithallew johorgu biss ftit fil-ghodu u wara jergu jissakru. il-familjari u l-istaff mhux kuntenti b'din is-sitwazzjoni fejn anzjani gewwa ma jithallewx ipejpu u jistennew il-hniena li xi hadd familjari johroghom. jekk wiehed jidhol fis-site ta' st. vincent de paul fejn suppost isiru attivitajiet ma jsib xejn ghal dawn l-anzjani. xi darba kienu jittiehdu imma dawn l-ahhar xhud qatt ma ittiehdu xi dawra barra dejjem maqfula. jafu li l-gheluq iggib il-mard inkluz l-iscabies? nistaqsi kien hemm kazijiet dawn l-ahhar gimghat ta' scabies f'din il-ward? waqt li certi swali ohra ghandhom tv flat screen kbar f'din is-sala hemm wiehed fil-gholi hafna antik zghir li taqla ghonqok biex tarah. jaf id-dipartiment li llum jezisti tv projector jekk l-iskuza hija li dawn jistaw ibghabsu t-tv? ghal dawn l-anzjani taghna ma hemmx flus? mhux lilhom ukoll qed tinzammilhom mill-penzjoni daqs l-ohrajn? nitlob lil onor. mario galea jintervjeni naf li ghandu ghal qalbu l-anzjani.
din il-link tikkonferma li ghal ward 8 tal-irgiel ma jezistux attivitajiet.
https://ehealth.gov.mt/HealthPortal/health_institutions/hospital_services/stvincentdepaul/residential_activities.aspx
Daniel Cachia
Oct 8th 2012, 07:56
Can anyone tell me where to report a lift that is always faulty ??? Obviously the lift supplier has been called hundred times but he fixes it and the lift stops after one or two days. Is there any authority for these kind of things please ?
Michael Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 15:09
If the lift was put into use less than 24 months ago, the installation is still covered by statutory warranty and due action taken against the installer concerned, and the matter may also be referred to the Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority (MCCAA).
In general however, the obvious thing is to entrust lift support services to a competent lift technician or service company, rather than persist in calling in an incompetent one.
Mary Borg
Oct 8th 2012, 07:29
400kg between 5 people? That's a hell of a weight for rescuers to lift. Why do we have to use old lifts in public places like hospitals? As far as I know, there are lifts that in such cases stop on the nearest floor and not midway causing havoc and panic. All public lifts should be update to the latest and safest versions due to their overuse. Hope no-one of the visitors was claustrophobic.
Simon Vella
Oct 8th 2012, 09:29
Excuse me, from where you know that it is an old lift? Maybe you work there or with the department? Do you know the nature of the fault??? If an emergency brake engages lift stops there and then and not like what happened to the 'lift' in Marsascala. Could be that lift in question is one of the newest and safest Ms Borg. The fact that it stopped does not mean it is dangerous. True, its an inconvenience when a lift stops but then what does not stop?
Vanessa-clair Farrugia
Oct 8th 2012, 21:04
Yepp, that's 80kgs for each person. Unless, they are rather tall, they are most probably over weight. They could be 80kgs+ of pure muscle of course, in which case, the latter wouldn't mind taking the stairs, I'm sure. :)
B. Farrugia
Oct 8th 2012, 07:17
At this point, maybe all the lifts at SVPR should be checked, to avoid a repeat episode.
Please choose the reason of your report below: