Advert

Mosta council was discussing upgrading of car park without knowledge of privatisation plans - councillor

Mosta council was, up to a fortnight ago, holding talks with the Resources Ministry on an upgrading of the car park near the church, only to suddenly learn that the car park was earmarked for privatisation by Transport Malta, Labour councillor  Alex Muscat said.

He said that the Resources Ministry officials never indicated that the site might be privatised.

Mosta council was unaware of plans to privatise the locality's car parkMosta council was unaware of plans to privatise the locality's car park

Mr Muscat was one of the speakers at a press conference given by Labour councillors from various localities where the government had planned to privatise car parks.

The press conference was presided by Rabat Mayor Sandro Craus.

Mr Craus complained that the privatisation process had been planned behind the councils' back and the councils wanted it cancelled.

He  argued that responsibility for the car parks should be handed to the councils. While Rabat council had no issue with private sector involvement in the management of the car parks, he felt that no charges should be imposed for residents.

Vince Borg, a councillor from Floriana, shared his views, adding that charges should also not imposed on those using health centres.

The privatisation plans for 32 car parks were announced by Transport Malta but were suspending on instructions from the government pending a debate in parliament. 

The Opposition has called for the debate to be held with urgency. The Speaker will rule on the matter this evening.

Advert

27 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Deo Catania

Oct 8th 2012, 19:02

Since when is parking free? ever heard of something called road tax?

Joseph Grech Attard

Oct 8th 2012, 18:12

Local councils want the car parks to be under their scrutiny, as the one in Hamrun, and not ALL Malta car parks to be under Transport Malta, as GonziPN tried to do.

Saviour Aquilina

Oct 8th 2012, 18:27

Mr greach Attard, if I`m wrong sorry, but Hamrun one Is TOTALLY PRIVITE, and Hamrun Council take rent or little part.....Check please.

P Mangion

Oct 8th 2012, 18:40

Mr. Aquilina, the Hamrun car park, formerly known as "is-suq" had approximately 30 parking spaces most of which would have been taken up all day by shop owners in the vicinity and this was not managed neither by a TM authorised parking attendant nor a private organisation.

the Hamrun Local Council administration requested to take over the lease of the land from the Central Government to develop a multi-purpose council administration centre with underlying multi-level car park facility.

the immediate benefit was that the council could operate from an administration centre worthy of its locality which includes access to physically impaired visitors and avoided the ever increasing rent of its previous office.

this car park, with all the amenities one would expect from modern state of the art car parks, including air ventilation, fire suppression and enhanced security, increased the parking capacity from 30 to 160 spaces to the benefit of the whole community and those visiting relatives or for shopping activities. Such investment could/would have never warranted that the car spaces be given out for free.

therefore there is no ground on which the Hamrun car park can ever be compared to 34 car parks being leased to private entities. had the stretch of land know as "is-suq" been kept as a 30 space car park and leased to private entities, than yes one could compare.

anthony bartolo

Oct 8th 2012, 22:54

we need new people in office...............how about you giving some leadership.You seem to have all the qualities of SOCIALIZM.

Frans Aguis

Oct 8th 2012, 18:24

It's different paying 50cents than paying some 1 euro per hour

vincent Lia

Oct 8th 2012, 18:57

The car park attendants were collecting money illegally and you should have never paid them to encourage their begging. Min qed jghix fil qamar? They were tips and car park attendants demanded money in car parks that are free. As an addition car parks should have a method of imposing a fee such as pay and display and the money goes to local councils.

Am Camilleri

Oct 8th 2012, 18:08

If its public land - shouldn't it be available for use by people - and not just as a storage facility for the lucky few metal boxes on wheels that are first to arrive?

Michael Borg

Oct 8th 2012, 18:28

@ Am sure not to the lucky first to arrive but according to you TO THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD TO PAY !!!! and those worth to make an end to cope with living can't park !!!!!

Am Camilleri

Oct 8th 2012, 19:21

@ Mr Borg - what?

J Martinelli

Oct 8th 2012, 19:52

@ Michael Borg

A car owner affords paying for the car, paying for the fuel, paying for insurance, paying for maintenance (oil changes etc.), but cannot afford parking fees?

Something is definitely wrong here. Is it OK to park 'for free' in the streets and have some clown dent your car and take off without leaving a note? What is cheaper, paying a parking fee or for an unscheduled body shop appointment and the resulting bill?

Jason Scerri

Oct 8th 2012, 20:16

@ J Martinelli

That's my point, we already pay a substantial amount of tax on everything which has to do with cars, VAT on parts, VAT on services, Tax on fuel, Roadtax, unscheduled repairs due to pot holes or unleveled non standard pavements ( the ones that you hit the car door when you open it) Vat on VRT. I've been hit in private car parks too and no one left me a note. And there were no security cameras too. The owners having a big disclaimer that they were not responsible. What makes you think that these car parks will be more secure? And believe me, I will stick to my guns regardless of who's in goverment. Public car parks should remain so.
We don't need the blood sucking parkers too!

Martin Saliba

Oct 8th 2012, 18:02

Kemm aw min hu injurant , tipruvaw tigustifikaw haga hazina bohra .

Michael Borg

Oct 8th 2012, 17:36

it is a NEW TAX my friend nothing more nothing less cause the supposed car parks are nothing more then a stretch of road WE ALREADY PAY EVERY YEAR

Martin Saliba

Oct 8th 2012, 17:53

You are wrong . While i do not agree but you pay your licence to use the road not to park in . One day we will all have to pay to park anywhere and everywhere .

Deo Catania

Oct 8th 2012, 19:09

Martin Saliba , il-licenzja tithallas biex il-vettura tkun tista tinzamm barra fit-triq igifieri kemm ipparkjata u kemm misjuqa.

Advert
Advert