Ex-papal butler convicted, sentenced to 18 months jail
Papal pardon 'likely'
A Vatican court convicted Pope Benedict's former butler of stealing sensitive documents and sentenced him to 18 months in prison today, at the end of one of the most sensational trials in the recent history of the Holy See.
A Vatican spokesman said the pope, who reigns as a supreme monarch in the world's smallest city-state, would "most likely" pardon Paolo Gabriele, which would mean he would not have to serve his sentence.
The court delivered its verdict after two hours of deliberations and closing arguments by the prosecution and the defence.
Gabriele had admitted being the source of leaks of highly sensitive papers, including letters to the pope that alleged corruption in the Vatican's business dealings.
"What I feel most strongly inside myself is the conviction that I acted exclusively out of love, I would say a visceral love, for the Church of Christ and its visible representative," he said in an impassive voice during a final appeal to the court.
"If I have to repeat it, I am not a thief," he added.
The prosecution had asked for a three-year sentence while the defence asked the court to reduce the charges from aggravated theft to misappropriation and for him to be freed.
The head of the three-judge panel, wearing a black robe with gold tassels, read the verdict with the opening words: "In the name of Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, gloriously reigning, the court has invoked the Holy Trinity and has reached its sentence."
The judge said he had given Gabriele a lighter sentence because he had no previous criminal record. Gabriele's lawyer and the Vatican spokesman said the former butler would be returned to house arrest in the Vatican for the time being.
The lawyer said she would decide after reading the court's formal explanation of its verdict whether to file an appeal.
BREACH OF TRUST
The trial, which started last Saturday, threw open the window on a betrayal of trust and sensitive secrets in the Vatican.
A former member of the small, select group known as "the papal family", Gabriele was one of fewer than 10 people who had a key to an elevator leading directly to the pope's apartments.
In the course of the trial, intimate details emerged of the inner workings of an institution long renowned for its secrecy.
The documents Gabriele leaked constituted one of the biggest crises of Pope Benedict's papacy when they emerged in a muckraking expose by an Italian journalist earlier this year.
The case has been an embarrassment for the Vatican, coming at a time when it was keen to rid itself from the taint left by a series of scandals involving sexual abuse of minors by clerics around the world and mismanagement at its bank.
Gabriele told investigators before the trial began that he leaked the documents because he saw "evil and corruption everywhere in the Church" and that information was being hidden from the pope.
Earlier this week Gabriele accused the Holy See's police of mistreating him while in custody. Members of the force in turn depicted the butler as a man obsessed with the occult, Masonic lodges and secret services. (Additional reporting by Hanna Rantala and Antonio Denti; Editing by Michael Roddy)
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Victor Laiviera
Oct 6th 2012, 16:58
So much for the protection of whistle blowers.
Joseph Aquilina
Oct 6th 2012, 17:34
No whistle blower act would NOT have protected this butler since what he revealed did not contain any form of wrong doing by the vatican or its members, but plain and simple private correspondance to the Pope.
Joe M Borg
Oct 6th 2012, 19:14
Dear Victor.
A whistleblower gives evidence to higher authorities who can take steps in checking the facts. If this guy gave these documents to the press....well, THAT is not whistleblowing. Whistleblowers don't get paid for revealing sensitive material, but newspapers DO pay!
Charles Grixti
Oct 6th 2012, 16:20
Of course why miss a golden opportunity to turn this into a PR exercise. Too bad that the Church did not arrest and try in its court those of its clergy that were charged with child abuse and paedophilia.
Joe M Borg
Oct 6th 2012, 19:16
If the church HAD done what you say, Mr Grixti, YOU will be the first to claim that the trial was BIASED. That's why they were tried in an INDEPENDENT court!
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Oct 6th 2012, 21:45
You see how quickly the hierarchy acts when it comes to saving its own bacon!
roberto bordino
Oct 6th 2012, 22:29
You are so right, they got away with it too, and always will
joseph engerer
Oct 6th 2012, 14:20
He has to be be convicted so the pope will forgive him,...
Peyton place.
Joe M Borg
Oct 6th 2012, 19:17
Yes, he HAD to be convicted. If he had been found innocent, there wouldn't have been any need for a Papal pardon. Think before you write.
Please choose the reason of your report below: