Advert

Mgr Charles Scicluna to be appointed Auxiliary Bishop of Malta - La Stampa

Mgr Charles Scicluna is to be appointed Auxiliary Bishop of Malta, succeeding the late Mgr Annetto Depasquale, according to Italian newspaper La Stampa.

The announcement is expected to be made by the Vatican tomorrow.

Born in 1959, Mgr Scicluna distinguished himself in the Holy See as the Promoter of Justice at the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith working closely with Cardinal Ratzinger before he became Pope Benedict.

He has also been the chief prosecutor in child abuse cases involving the clergy.

Last year Mgr Scicluna caused ripples in the local church when he criticised its handling of local abuse cases and pushed for a faster conclusion. He also indicated that the victims deserved compensation.

See http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110807/local/Vatican-official-intervened-to-speed-up-sex-abuse-probe.379055

Advert

42 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joseph Borg

Oct 6th 2012, 14:29

Sorry you are absolutley wrong. You dont know the history and it is your invention to say that Christ founded the catholic church. Another invention is that the bible is an authority given by the catholic church. The Bible is solely authorized by God.You seem that you dont even understand the bible. I never said that Jesus want a small flock. Read again my comment. About the establishment of the catholic church in Constantine era is strongly approved and documented. About Peter that he died Rome does not mean that he was the first pope in Rome. The first head of Christ church was James in Jerusalem. Peter went to Asia Minor now Turkey and he reside and taught there. To say that the pope is infallibly that was a dogma that everyone had to accept that time but today people are not ignorant. There are alot to say about the catholic church but it si not possible to mention them here. Everybody knows today in which situation the catholic church is, Look at all the scandals in the vatican and then you can proof for yourself if it is Christ church. Jesus always said that He will be with His church forever. Do you think He is with the catholic church and let all this on going corruption. Think about it my friend.

C Busuttil

Oct 6th 2012, 16:11

@Joseph Borg

Please stop distorting history, you claim that the catholic church was established by Constantine. For your information the name "Catholic" was applied a millenium after Constantine. Further you claim this is well documented and approved. So now can you tell me from which sources you get this ? since historians have been trying to find such sources for centuries. The only contemporary sources we have from that era is from Aurelius Victor and Eutropius, who hardly mention christianity, the only other source is Eusebius of Caesarea who has written the history of the church.
Besides Nicea was everything but not a tool to accomodate authorities, by the way who are these authorities ?

Stop trying to judge events of 1700 years ago by today standards and through distortions such as the DaVinci code.
You can try other subjects on which to criticize the church but stop distorting history because you lack the basics

Ramon Casha

Oct 8th 2012, 19:16

"Saying that the Church started at the time of Constantine contradicts history."

You're quite right. The Catholic and Orthodox churches both started long after Constantine, in the year 1054 to be precise, when the western and eastern churches split apart over petty politics (ie, who is the top man). There is no evidence that Peter was ever in Rome and circumstantial evidence makes it extremely unlikely. Paul, the creator of Christianity, was in Rome however.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 6th 2012, 10:21

@ Maria Vassallo today at 06:26

My question was rhetorical. I do not feel the need to address it directly to Fr Joe Galea because I myself do not have the slightest doubt that his comment did not mean that that when Mgr Scicluna is confirmed as an auxiliary bishop of Malta he will be the first and only "serious" bishop to grace the diocese of Malta. Only the inveterate detractors of the Malta Catholic diocese would have an interest to create that false impression and to attribute it to Fr. Galea.

Joe Zammit

Oct 6th 2012, 09:52

Is the Catholic Church the only one Church of Christ? The answer to this question is definitely yes.

Confusion abounds in those who try to discredit the genuineness of the Catholic Church. To say that the
Church started at the time of Constantine contradicts history.

St Peter was the first Pope. History proves it. St Linus was the second Pope. History proves it. St Peter went to Rome and died as a martyr. Hence the Popes resided in Rome. Christ wanted to show how much he is with the Catholic Church. The Roman emperors persecuted the Church and eventually the Catholic Church took the very place where the emperors ruled.

The Bible has not authority without the authority of the Catholic Church. We believe that the Bible is the Word of God because the Catholic Church infallibly teaches that the Bible is the Word of God. But the Catholic Church started teaching before the New Testament was written. And when it was written it was handed to the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church used to copy the New Testament, and for that matter the Old Testament as well, and preserved it throughout the ages. No other Church existed in the first millennium.

To say that Christ wants a small flock in his Church contradicts precisely what Jesus wanted. He commanded the Apostles and their successors to go and teach all nations. Christ wants all people to be saved and those who go to Hell can blame only themselves.

Christ set up One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Satan did away with the one true Church of Christ and invented other false churches. Separations from the one true Church of Christ can only be devilish because Christ prayed before he died to preserve unity in his Church.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 5th 2012, 17:56

@ Maria Vassallo today at 15:59

Perhaps Fr Joe Galea meant that Malta needs ONE MORE serious bishop - at least I hope so!

Joseph Borg

Oct 5th 2012, 13:03

Ilqatt il musmar fuq rasu ezatt when saying "Malta needs a serious bishop who is faithful to the teachings of the Church". Exactly not the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Anthony Galea

Oct 5th 2012, 17:02

The teachings of the Church are the teachings of Christ, Joseph Borg, because Christ founded the Church (Mt 16:18) and the bishops are the successors of the Apostles, with the pope being the successor of Saint Peter himself.

Joe Zammit

Oct 5th 2012, 17:11


The Church is the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of Christ. Christ founded one Church and St Paul tells us clearly that the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ. So the teaching of the Church is the teaching of Christ. Christ said it frankly that he would remain with his one Church up to the end of time.

Those who are against this one true Church of Christ are against Christ.

It's crass ignorance to say that the teaching of the Church is not the teaching of Christ.

Today Christ continues to speak to us through his Church.

George Lewis

Oct 5th 2012, 19:05

Are you insinuating that the bishops we have and have had are or were not serious?How could anyone come to such conclusions?I hope that this senseless comment will never again be repeated.

Thank God for the bishops we have had and for the present ones .May the good Lord bless and keep them.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Oct 5th 2012, 20:00

@ Joseph G Galea today at 12:47

The teaching of the Church in Malta and Gozo IS the teaching of Christ. I have in mind particularly the teaching of the bishops of the Malta and Gozo dioceses regarding the indissolubly of marriage as enunciated by Christ in the NT gospels. There is no reason to anticipate that Mgr Scicluna would preach a different message.

Advert
Advert