Advert

Senglea trees to stay as plans are changed

Most of the trees at Senglea seafront are to be retained after all, with the Transport Ministry bowing to public pressure to review its designs for the upgrading of the area.

The ministry explained how, before the works were taken in hand, it had carried out extensive consultation with stakeholders. A full development application was submitted to Mepa and no objection was made to the replacement of the trees with others. Mepa granted the permit for the trees to be relocated.

It was only once the works were taken in hand that complaints started being made about the uprooting of the 44 trees (30 Ficus Nitida and 14 Tamarisk).

The ministry said it will be submitting new plans which would see the relocation of only three of the Ficus and eight of the Tamarisk trees. They will be replanted in another section of the seafront.

The project will create a wider road for easier access to coaches serving the cruise liner berth at Senglea Point.

As a result of the redesign, however, the hardstanding facility for boat owners will be smaller than planned and it is not clear whether there will be fewer parking  spaces.

Advert

81 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Arthur Taliana

Oct 3rd 2012, 09:23

100 per cent correct

Joe Sultana

Oct 3rd 2012, 11:23

there's another person that believes the massacre of the trees at MELLIEHA was a disgrace and an insult to that once-beautiful piazza.
Whoever had that bright idea shoukld go and hide!

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Oct 3rd 2012, 10:38

This is what is done in England. I believe this was one of the proposed reforms for MEPA - of course, it never happened. Now I wonder why.

Franco Abela

Oct 3rd 2012, 08:02

I AGREE. LAST WEEK WAS MY LAST TIME DINING AT BIRGU! IT WAS A NIGHTMARE TO FIND A PARKING SPOT!

D M Grech

Oct 2nd 2012, 21:27

Are you sure the existing trees going to be replaced with (presumably more) toxic and invasive Melia Azedarach trees?

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 19:23

Ray Buhagiar The Ficus Nitida if planted well will not cause any root damage.
Drive around the country and see the hundreds of Ficus that are not doing any damage after years in the ground.

Astrid Vella

Oct 2nd 2012, 19:30

Damage by ficus roots is avoidable if the planting bed is adequately prepared and that seems to have been the case here as the promenade is intact as are the services beneath. A good lesson for other locations.

Adrian Meli

Oct 2nd 2012, 18:48

I agree that Cospicua has been left in a disatrous state. Could it be due to the fact that it is considered to be a labour stronghold? I wonder....

Peter Murray

Oct 2nd 2012, 19:07

A battle won - but not the war.But what about the fate of the 11 trees about to be transplanted -what hope for them?

Peter Murray

Oct 2nd 2012, 19:07

A battle won - but not the war.But what about the fate of the 11 trees about to be transplanted -what hope for them?

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:38

Victor you are right so get organized and talk to the local Council. It would be said if that square is turned into the concrete shadeless place we saw ion the diagrams.

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:26

Nobody has been complaing about the regeneration of the area, even though this has been done, like in the case of the Bormla citizens, at their expense and inconvenience as well as the loss of those beautiful old trees that used to give them shade while they walked.
The complain was that the original design meant the loss of the iconic mature trees on the promenade.
Mr.Stellini, the best part of the Creek is in fact L'isla promenade which still maintains a Mediterranean feel to it. One of the things that makes this promenade attractive are in fact these old Ficus, that the government now agrees should stay in place. When one looks across to the yacht marina from Senglea one get the impression of a barren site. In fact , while sitting at L-isla its the green of the trees of the Memorial and the trees of Cottonera that catch the eye.

James Tyrrell

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:30

David trees are important. It's not as if the island is swamped with them. Of course improvements are important but improvements can take place without cutting down trees. It just means that those responsible have to actually think a bit!

Arthur Taliana

Oct 2nd 2012, 18:39

When did you last visit the area? Or do you reside on Commino?

Louis Saliba

Oct 2nd 2012, 18:47

@ David Stellini

1. We are talking about trees, specifically about the trees along the Senglea seafront, so the bulk of your post is, at best, only peripheral (if at all relevant) to the point in question.

2. According to you (and a few others of your ilk), anybody who complains about anything is labelled under the heading of "Maltese Gemgem". Apparently, it has never entered your head that people have a right to complain about what they feel is wrong, and that quite a large proportion of complaints are fully justified.

3. If I may be allowed to digress from the main theme and reply to your general remarks, perhaps you could lend me your magic glasses so that perhaps I can get a better view of the "regeneration of the whole area" you mention, along with what you call "the best Marina in the Med". One tends to wonder whether you have ever seen any other Marina in the Mediterranean. Certainly, there have been improvements in the Three Cities area over the years, but perhaps before you start singing songs of praise, you might like to take a look at the present indescribable state of the Cospicua seafront (from Gavino Gulia Square to just beyond St Theresa's Church) - preferably after taking off the glasses in question unless, as I very much fear, they are permanently welded on.

Tony Camilleri

Oct 2nd 2012, 22:52

Are you referring to Malta or to some other country because the Bormla project is a total disaster.

MT Caruana

Oct 3rd 2012, 08:39

@Mr.Stellini,

Are you for real? Do you live on the moon?
Yes Cospicua is a PL fort, so is Senglea..so? You have a problem with that?

The Marina in Vittoriosa is awesome that is true, but for you to get to it, you are lucky if you don't break your neck.Go and see for yourself before to bla bla bla.........
Re your comment of the Curia......shame on you.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE.

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:15

Senglea will gain a badly needed investment in infrastructure which will include, refurbishment of the promenade, making it even more attractive to those tourists that would prefer not to do the tours but their own explorations.

Victor Pulis

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:40

Tourists already visit tthe senglea promenade without the refurbishment.Those arriving on the cruise liners will be driven off to some more privilaged place. I am all for refurbishment but I doubt id Senglea will get any benefit. what the city will get is more heavy traffic, less parking space and a narrower road.

joseph saliba

Oct 2nd 2012, 16:28

Now Mr Busuttil you make the political motive behind your protest very clear. If anything a minister takes the initiative for an embellishment project. Does not plan street alignments, plant, replant and destroy trees. If anything he faces controversial decisions where others fail and takes the blame from experts and dilettantes alike. Not to mention he might earn some votes (which is not the case here) from the grateful and insults from the ungrateful.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:46

Saliba: where is the political motive? i just cannot understand that simply because one complains about the way a minister acts, then there is a political motive. When are we going to grow up and start acting maturely, putting the blame or praise no matter what political shade the ministers are? Mr Busuttil's complaint is objective in a political sense. What does Saliba expect - that we all shut up and bow our heads to the minister? This is 2012 and not 1988 you know.

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:47


@Joseph Saliba, Theodore Roosevelt used to have a plaque on his desk which stated "The Buck Stops Here" meaning that he shoulders ALL responsibility for whatever happens under his tenure.
These projects do not happen blindly and even allowing for delegation, which shows good leadership, the final decision is of the person at the top.
The ministers had introduced what I think was a revolutionary Trees and woodland protection act of 2001 where all trees, with the exception of invasive ones, where protected, and the minister changed the same act in 2011 removing the protection from all trees unless in conservation areas.

joseph saliba

Oct 2nd 2012, 16:34

"Start to worry when public opinions and even demonstrations have no effect on changing the mind of the State" Well said Mr Grixti. An epitome of sagacity.

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:52

Charles Mangion, the pavement should remain the same as its now, which was not the case before the change of mind where it was going to be narrowed to make space for the wintering of the Dajhsa tal pas, which apparently are now going to be near the Macina.

James Tyrrell

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:25

Was a notice of the impending work put up in a prominent place in the area Paul or was it as sometimes happens forgotten about or hidden? A lot of the time the only indication that something is planned is when the workmen arrive!

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:56

Paul, you would be surprised. Most of the people we spoke to did not know about the project. Those that knew were not aware that the trees were going to be removed. All the people we spoke to, wanted the trees to stay.

paul camilleri

Oct 2nd 2012, 20:17

@ Tyrrell and Anastasi

All i can say sir is when they planned to re do the playing fileds in our area copy of the plans were sent to us by the council with Mepa approval stamped on it. although these works have not yet begun the residents have had ample time to suppliment other ideas which could be implimented before such works were to be carried out..

so maybe one should blame the local council for failing to keep the residents informed of how the development was to be carried out?

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 23:07

Mr>Camilleri,
" It is the legal obligation of the developer to inform the citizens of any projects. Farther to that there should also be clear signage advising that there is a project under consideration. these signs have to be clearly posted where people can see them and should include the PA permit number, and an brief explanation of what is being proposed.
You state "All I can say sir is when they planned to re do the playing fields in our area copy of the plans were sent to us by the council with Mepa approval stamped on it. "
You clearly state that you were not informed till AFTER MEPA had approved the project. If anybody did not agree with the project then it would have been too late to do anything about it.
Very convenient, but unfortunately its how we are starting to do things on this island.

paul camilleri

Oct 3rd 2012, 10:40

@ Mr Anastasi

Sir while it was approved by MEPA we still had time to object to the design and still can as works have not yet started and all this is because we simply recieved a plan, what did the residents in Senglea recieve??? according to you nothing, so Sir i say to you that it is the councils fault for not informing the people when they knew about it.

Gordon Farrugia

Oct 2nd 2012, 15:44

yes power to the people and the facebook petition we supported. Just like the parking issue - we need to make our voices felt - they won't do anything that will bring our ire (of course because elections are near!!!)

J Micallef

Oct 2nd 2012, 15:46

Sometimes I think that it's better if everything is left as it is, and instead of these redicolous projects, we giv ethe place a good clean up and save the money.

After all, we are only getting shoddy work, which is finished behind schedule and costs way above the budget.

Antonio Anastasi

Oct 2nd 2012, 18:02

Steve Aquilina, you are right, those are the old plans.....now in their statement as reported above, they try and shift the blame by saying that there is going to be a loss of parking.
Till now you can park along most and on both sides of the promenade where the kiosks are. The refurbishment reduces the parking space to one side of the road and if i remember rightly to only part of the road.

@J.Micallef, sometimes I think that you are right.

Gillian Snook

Oct 2nd 2012, 16:17

Well put Mr Borg.

I just hope the "few trees" which are still going to be moved will be dealt with professionally and not by those who THINK they know what they are doing.

Advert
Advert