Advert

Curia records Budget surplus - first in three years

Video: Curia Communications Office

The Maltese Curia last year recorded a surplus of €114,279, financial controller Robert Agius told a press conference today.

It was the first surplus in three years.

In the previous year the Curia had a deficit of €1.7 million, caused mainly by the Pope's visit.

Mr Agius said that revenue in 2011 was of €24.7m, a slight increase from €24.5 in 2010. Collections and donations totalled €7.7m, a drop from €8.5 in the previous year. Income increased from other sources such as property and fees.

Expenditure reached €24.9m from €26.2m in 2010. The biggest outlay was in salaries to lay employees totalling €10.2m, operational costs of €9.7m and remuneration to priests at €2.4m. The Church made donation €486,00 of which €189,000 were for the anti-divorce campaign.

The Curia, however, made a capital gain on investments of €267,665 compared to €3,602 in the year before. Most arose from the sale of Malta government stocks, which were reinvested in APS bank.

Taxation reached €939,000.

Mgr Charles Cordina said measures had been taken to cut costs particularly with regard to water and electricity.

He said the role of the Church was not just in spread God's Word but also the provision of important care services to vulnerable persons including children, the elderly and those with disabilities.

He thanked volunteers for their invaluable work.

The press conference was held at Fra Diego children's home. Mr Agius said that children's homes were running at a deficit and relied on the assistance of the Curia's central fund,which last year handed out almost €200,000 for the purpose. They also relied heavily on donations.

Advert

21 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

J. Debono

Oct 2nd 2012, 20:42

Church schools ask for no fees.

You are expected to give a donation, but is not obliged to do so.

On the other hand, church schools work at a loss, and without donations, I would not blame the church if it closes them down.

J. Debono

Oct 3rd 2012, 07:06

@ Joseph Micallef

"so they can ask for less fees at church schools" - it is not a fee but a donation, you are not obliged to give it, as do many parents

"reduce the exorbitant charges for filing annulments" - you cannot pretend the church to pay for the lawyers etc. involved in annulments!!!! After all the church has no fault in a annulled marriage!

"distribute money to the poor" - are you not aware of the work of the church - Dar tal-Providenza, Appogg, Caritas, Church Schools (which are free), Dar tal-Anzjani, etc. etc. etc. It is all for free!

"give higher wages to its employees like teachers" - nobody I know complains of the wages the church gives - FYI - the teachers in church schools are paid by the Government NOT by the church, which is the reason why church schools are free.

Joseph Micallef

Oct 3rd 2012, 11:30

@ J. Debono

Well done for being an excellent apologist for the church, however, you are barking at the wrong tree as I think that I know a bit about the church.... having been so, so close to its institutions for more than a decade, I know a bit how things work:

Donations (aka fees):

True, mela, very true, no fees hux (thanks to the labor government of the 80's). Saqsi lil dawk il-genituri li ma jaghtux id-donations ħalli jgħidulek kemm il-darba jircivu reminders biex iħalsu jew ara jekk ikunx hemm xi ħars differenti! Saqsihom!

Filing of anulments:

Uzgur, mhux hekk, mhux tort taghha. Izda tort taghha jekk il-process ittawwalulek ghal xi 8 snin! U l-istess process jkun jista jinqata f'anqas minn sena! U c-charges zejda li hemm? Gieli rajthom? Saqsi lil min hu mgarrab halli tkun taf!

Distribute money to the poor:

Are you serious? Vera li xi whud jimxu fuq il-passi ta' Kristu izda ara numru ta' sacerdoti, bil-karozzi lussuzi, bl-aqwa mobile phones. Ara certu nies fit-tmexxija ta' l-iskejjel tal-knisja bl-ispeed boats u jghixu gol-vilel. B'xejn ma tghidx li dawn jghixu fil-faqar hux? Jekk tahseb li hekk, nassigurak li wahdek tahseb hekk.

Give higher wages to its employees:

Habib, naf aktar minnek kif jithalsu l-ghalliema. Ma konts qed nirreferi ghal ghalliema biss jien, nissugerilek tqalleb fid-dizjunarju halli tara xi tfisser 'employees'. Taf li l-ghalliema fl-iskejjel tal-knisja m'ghandhom l-ebda rizorzi meta mqabblin ma' dawk tal-gvern? Ezempju wiehed baziku: laptops. Tal-gvern kollha bil-computer, tal-knisja ma jeziztux! Mela l-knisja teachers biss ghandha?, tezizti l-media taghha? ara kif jithalsu in-nies fil-media taghha, mur saqsihom halli taqbad tidhaq tisma r-rati ta' hlas!! Mur, saqsi!

Nahseb ahjar ticcekja l-fatti qabel ma titkellem habib.

Joseph Aquilina

Oct 2nd 2012, 17:39

Mark Brincat, that money was not wasted, that money served to help people understand better the values of the Church on the particular subject. The fact is that the YES camp thinks they made a big win when in fact 47% of the people voted NO and many from the lejber camp opted not to vote because they did not want to choose between the Church and Joseph. So that money was definitely not wasted.

I Bugeja

Oct 2nd 2012, 20:22

Joseph Aquilina... how "many" Labour voters chose not to vote? Please let me know, it would be interesting to know.

Anthony Galea

Oct 2nd 2012, 22:18

Titbissem ghax inhela l-flus Mark? Sfortuna grassa li nippprovaw ngharrqu lil min ma jaqbilx maghna. Imm sfortunatament dik il-mentalita drajniha Malta.

Destructive criticism at its best-kompli immagina li int progressiv!

Anthony Scicluna

Oct 2nd 2012, 16:16

You are wrong. By definition, a budget is a projection or forecast of expenditure and revenue. One may budget for losses as well as profits.

A.Felex Busuttil

Oct 2nd 2012, 15:18

dejjem kif qabillhom
when are we going to see the Gozo Curia accounts?

Advert
Advert