Advert

Court finds no violation of Norman Lowell's human rights

Norman Lowell

Norman Lowell

A court said today that the human rights of far-right activist Norman Lowell were not violated when he was interrogated without the presence of a lawyer, since a subsequent conviction of inciting racial hatred was not based on his statements to the police.

Mr Justice Anthony Ellul, presiding the First Hall of the Civil Court (in its Constitutional Jurisdiction) delivered the judgement following a constitutional reference made by the Court of Criminal Appeal which is hearing Mr Lowell's appeal from his conviction.

Mr Lowell was charged on May 26, 2006 with having incited racial hatred in two public meetings. He was also accused of having committed the same offence by means of an article. The Magistrates' Court found Mr Lowell guilty of all charges in March 2008 and sentenced him to two years imprisonment, suspended for four years and to a fine of €500.

Mr Lowell appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeal.

In the course of the appeal proceedings Mr Lowell claimed that he had not been assisted by a lawyer during his interrogation by the police and that this was in violation of his human rights.

The Court of Criminal Appeal referred this claim to the First Hall of the Civil Court for a ruling.

Mr Justice Ellul heard that Mr Lowell had given two statements to the police when he was arrested. He had not been assisted by a lawyer because the law in 2006 did not provide for such a right.

Mr Lowell had refused to sign his statements to the police, but the Civil Court  concluded that the conviction by the Magistrates Court was not based on the statements, made without legal assistance.

The Magistrates Court had based its decisions on the transcripts of the words used by Mr Lowell in his meetings and on the contents of his article. That court had concluded that a person of ordinary understanding would find those words offensive and tantamount to racial abuse and hatred.

The First Hall of the Civil Court therefore concluded that no violation of Mr Lowell's human rights had occurred.

Advert

35 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joe Fenech

Oct 3rd 2012, 23:00

SPOT ON !

Bertrand Gove

Oct 3rd 2012, 08:58

Not clever

Carmelo Aquilina

Oct 3rd 2012, 10:51

can you list these stunningly prescient prophecies Trevor ?..one of the is that 2012 is 'anno zero' when the far right will take over Europe... some prophecy...some prophet !

Tony Camilleri

Oct 2nd 2012, 22:39

Fully agree with you. Let's send a message to the eu and the political parties on illegal immigration.

Philip Hili

Oct 2nd 2012, 23:02

@ Tony Borg

I bet you Tony that he will bring more votes than Franco Debono!!!!

W Cassar

Oct 2nd 2012, 18:46

Political correctness also involves doing the honorable thing like resigning when you have failed to achieve the advertised goals.

Have not see any of that in the past 5 years!

Matthew Vella

Oct 2nd 2012, 18:50

Why on earth would it end?

Psychos like him shouldn't be allowed to spew such ignorance in public.

B. Cachia

Oct 2nd 2012, 19:44

@ Matthew Vella: Because other people's freedom of speech should not depend on whether we agree with them or not or whether we find what they say offensive or not.

Graham Sansone

Oct 2nd 2012, 20:52

very well said Adriano.

Graham Sansone

Oct 3rd 2012, 08:37

Well said Adriano

Karl Consiglio

Oct 3rd 2012, 12:36

Matthew Vella,

Is this not a democracy?

Karl Consiglio

Oct 3rd 2012, 12:34

Family values differ from house to house.

Joe Fenech

Oct 2nd 2012, 18:50

And he pointed out all the problems that are going to give Malta its final blow.

P Bonnici

Oct 2nd 2012, 19:12

Labour stand on the fence, on neither side, they have to please everyone.

Advert
Advert