Nurses’ directive threatens to ruin gains in MRSA battle
One of the most important interventions is an intravenous drip through which medications that cannot be given by mouth are administered.
Mater Dei Hospital’s hard-fought gains in the battle against the deadly superbug MRSA are being threatened by a nurses’ union directive that comes into force tomorrow, The Sunday Times has learnt.
Nurses are being instructed to stop filling in the Visual Infusion Phlebitis (Vip) score chart – a daily nursing assessment that sounds complicated but is actually a simple task put in place to minimise a patient’s risk of infection.
This practice, introduced a year ago, has led to a “massive reduction” in the type of antibiotic-resistant MRSA blood infections related to intravenous drips, according to Michael Borg,Mater Dei’s Infection Control Committee chairman.
10-15%
percentage of patients admitted to Mater Dei are unknowing carriers of the superbug
The action is part of the Malta Union of Midwives and Nurses’ attempts to change the opening hours of the hospital’s salary section and make it more accessible to its members who needed to address inaccuracies in their pay cheque.
“The first directive is a minor one, which will not disrupt any nursing practices,” the union said in a statement sent to the health authorities.
However, Dr Borg said the Vip score was a vital part of the hospital’s efforts to reduce the bloodstream infections caused by MRSA, which kill one of every three patients who contract this infection.
“One of the most important interventions in any hospital is an intravenous drip through which we not only provide patients with lifesaving fluids directly into their vein but also administer medications that cannot be given by mouth,” Dr Borg explained when contacted.
“However, this requires an unavoidable break in the patient’s skin, which can serve as a direct shortcut for microbes between the skin and the blood.”
If the patient is a carrier of MRSA, the superbug can enter into the breach in the skin and multiply underneath causing a mild skin infection, which shows up as redness, swelling and discomfort at the needle site. Unless the initial infection is detected early, the microbes will have time to enter into the vein, spreading and leading to a very severe infection.
Local research has shown that 10 to 15 per cent of patients admitted to Mater Dei are unknowing carriers of the superbug; one of the highest rates recorded anywhere in the world.
In line with the UK’s Royal College of Nurses’ guidelines, nurses examine the skin around the drip needle on a daily basis while carrying out routine patient checks and then fill in a chart with their assessment by ticking off boxes.
Dr Borg, a lead clinician on infection control, said this task was usually completed in less than a minute.
“The documentation is vital to maintain consistency of practice and ensure an effective handover from one nursing shift to the next, therefore guaranteeing quality of care to the patient; it is also essential for medico-legal reasons,” he said.
“If the Vip chart score shows an increased risk, the drip is removed, immediately pre-empting further complications from developing.”
When contacted an MUMN representative said: “This has nothing to do with MRSA. We simply instructed our members not to fill in the score chart. Nurses will still examine patients and if there’s something wrong they will call a doctor."
He added that the instruction merely instructed members to drop the paperwork and shrugged off the impact of such a “minor” directive.
“You don’t need a chart to check patients. Plus, this system, introduced three months ago, was never popular with anyone and it’s been ignored,” he added.
However, Dr Borg insisted the practice was introduced in September 2011, not just three months ago, after extensive consultation meetings with nurses and junior doctors, followed by a trial period.
Rather than being ignored, the uptake had been extremely good and recent hospital audits showed many wards had compliance rates of over 90 per cent.
He pointed out that the guidelines of the UK’s Royal College of Nurses, to which the MUMN is affiliated, clearly stipulate: “All patients... must have the IV site checked at least daily for signs of infusion phlebitis. The subsequent score and action taken (if any) must be documented.”
Dr Borg said: “If the procedure isn’t important, why would the RCN recommend the Vip score should be done at least daily and insist that all assessments must be documented even if no action is taken?”
Most hospitals in the UK filled in the Vip score several times a day, but Mater Dei opted for once a day so as not to overburden nurses.
“Even at this reduced frequency the initiative has been a spectacular success. Just a couple of years ago we would trace more than 10 MRSA blood infections a year to preceding skin infections at the site of the drip needle. Now we barely ever see one,” Dr Borg said.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
N Mifsud
Oct 1st 2012, 00:52
Shame on MUMN to issue directives that could expose patients to such risks! Health authorities should immediately take MUMN to court to stop this directive before it is too late on some patients. Patients and their respective families should hold the respective nurses & midwives legally responsible if this happens!
This is an irresponsible act by the Union and in these circumstances nurses & midwives should act responsible and IGNORE their Union!
T Cassar
Sep 30th 2012, 14:24
A doctor quoting the RCN. How refreshing!
John Azzopoardi
Sep 30th 2012, 13:46
What people never realize is that our little island is overburdened by many people who are in Malta legally and illegally. Our population increased by almost 25000 in the past 10 years and there was no contigency plans to address this issue. Many people are using our only one hospital more frequently, especially the boat people that are being brought to Malta. Malta cannot sustain this influx. And this is our leaders fault.
Francis Saliba M.D.
Sep 30th 2012, 11:14
With anti-social directives like these, the MUMN is bringing the whole nursing and midwifery professions into disrepute. Cui bono?
Joseph E Briffa
Sep 30th 2012, 10:32
If true, this is a downright irresponsible attitude which should make the MUMN leadership hide their face in shame. And this on the flimsy excuse that ticking a few boxes entails more paperwork which the nurses can ill afford. Even if it were time-consuming, it should be done, given the severity of infections of MRSA. Yet they have the time to spend in an office to check their pay cheques! Unbelievable!
Joseph E Briffa
Sep 30th 2012, 10:32
If true, this is a downright irresponsible attitude which should make the MUMN leadership hide their face in shame. And this on the flimsy excuse that ticking a few boxes entails more paperwork which the nurses can ill afford. Even if it were time-consuming, it should be done, given the severity of infections of MRSA. Yet they have the time to spend in an office to check their pay cheques! Unbelievable!
carlos ellul
Sep 30th 2012, 09:32
Werent we told that unlike the others in the medical profession, nurses put the patient first?
C Sant
Sep 30th 2012, 09:29
Is MUMN really looking forward as fighting for a more professional Nurses, or is it there as an ego trip for its core council members? I wonder? And how come its official can contradict well carried out audits referring to start up date and take up? Where is this official working? And is he better equipped to decide what is useful or not in the fight against MRSA than researchers (mostly from the nurses profession) that have published extensively in peer reviewed journals?
Danika Vella
Sep 30th 2012, 09:28
The MUMN is being so irresponsible at the risk of patients contracting this infection in their blood stream just for the sake of having the salary department open at different times? Amazing!
Please choose the reason of your report below: