Advert

Imam halts film protest

Imam Mohammad El Sadi refused to sanction a protest against the amateur anti-Islam film that sparked riots around the world, despite the insistence of “many” Muslims in Malta.

There are other ways to convey message

“I was asked by many Muslims in Malta to organise a demonstration to protest against the provocative film,” he writes in an opinion piece published in The Times today to clarify previous comments he made about the film.

“But I chose not to do so fearing it may get out of hand and send the wrong message and because there are other ways to protest and convey our message,” he adds.

Mr El Sadi recently said the You Tube film was to blame for the deaths of several people, including US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who were killed amid the protests that have inflamed the Arab world.

In his article today (see No peace without respect), he responds to criticism levelled at him, particularly by the Humanist Movement, which took him to task for “playing down the barbarity” of the reaction to the film.

Mr El Sadi says he “strongly” condemns the attacks and acknowledges that no Western country is responsible for the film or is legally empowered to censor it but insists that it is high time to “discipline the extremely abused freedom of expression”.

Advert

130 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Robert Callus

Sep 26th 2012, 20:24

Are you telling me that I'm not in MY country because I'm not Christian? Or that you're doing someone a favour by allowing Maltese atheists, Muslims, Buddhits, Jews and Hindus to live in THEIR country, which is Malta?

While I disagree with Mr El Sadi's opinion of freedom of speech and the humanists, I find your mentality much scarier.

Charles Sammut

Sep 27th 2012, 02:02

@ Robert Callus....I shall not waste too much of my time and energy in responding to your banal comments!
I just want to put your mind at ease and assure you that the fact that you are not Christian ( your words not mine ), I do not hold it against you. You are free to practice whatever religion or none at all, that you so please without fear of persecution or restrictions from me or my fellow Christians. When Easter comes along, you are not expected to fast or to follow the Catholic Church's Dogma. ..I rest my case...

...and the bleat goes on...and the bleat goes on.....

Charles Attard

Sep 28th 2012, 08:34

Mr Charles Sammut is living in a dream ...He speaks of We Christians.. How many Maltese are true Christians? Mr Sammut you yourself ARE Not a true Christian, as Christians speak with love respect to their fellow brothers and sisters, Muslim, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists , Atheists and other religions alike!! All I read is rhetoric hate .. towards Muslim People and no other creed. We are past 1565 the Crusade era..where battles where fought between armies using Religion as an excuse!!! How funny to live freely among (amongst) us you said.. so you are saying any Maltese who are also Muslim are privileged to be living amongst their Maltese brothers and sisters.. What a load of crap!!!!

Kate Micallef

Sep 26th 2012, 16:33

I fully agree with you....

D Vella

Sep 28th 2012, 16:20

That's right mate . . . look what happened to the Catholic Church when there was an outcry over Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code . . . he should thank them for selling at least another two million copies that he would otherwise have done . . . !

Dr Alex Bugeja

Sep 26th 2012, 18:12

Even if that were true, it would be a wrong far lower on the scale of wrongs than the wrong of violently killing people who are completely innocent because some obscure 3rd party hurt your feelings with a stupid video.

matthew tanti

Sep 27th 2012, 11:49

two wrong never make a right

Christine Xuereb

Sep 26th 2012, 13:26

@Mario Whilst I agree that the Imam is right on not going through with protest, yes- we are living in a democratic country where EVERYONE should be given freedom of speech.
Now, what makes you think that Muslims protest by flag burning and rioting. Just because a FEW have done that and most world news press on that for political gain, you must see to the situation as a whole. The bigger part of Muslims are NOT violent & do not impose their religion- I can tell you because I am married to a Muslim & he never imposed the religion on me! Neither does he treat me as an inferior sex as many are taught to believe!

I suggest a few readings for you:
http://en.avaaz.org/783/muslim-rage-protests-newsweek-salafists?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social_media&utm_content=_bottom&utm_campaign=stop-the-clash%3Fv%3D185048120923

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/09/20129168313878423.html?fb_action_ids=10151213296435865&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/libya-violence-and-free-speech/?smid=fb-share


Patrick Zammit

Sep 26th 2012, 13:42

Anthony, what do you think the Imam's response would have been had he been the leader of a much bigger percentage of Muslims?

Christine Xuereb

Sep 26th 2012, 17:41

@John Benjamin Vincenti- If you are a Christian, I do not think you know enough about the faith you follow as Christians believe that Jesus is God and not just a prophet !

Karl Abela

Sep 26th 2012, 14:41

Xghandu xjaqsam????!!??

mario delicata

Sep 26th 2012, 13:41

Very well said Mike!

manuel Attard

Sep 26th 2012, 12:32

bir rispett kollu , jiena bhalek nisrani , imma ma naqbilx mieghek meta tighd li r-religjonijiet l-ohrajn jibatu lil min joqtol.joqtol biss min hu estremist. fittex fil koran jew fuq kotba religjuzi ohrajn huma liema huma u ara issibx fejn persuna tmur toqtol ohra taht il kmand ta Alla.
kull hadd ghandu jgib quddiem ghajnejh li mhux sewwa li nitfaw lil kull min hu ta religjon differenti min taghna f' l-istess keffa ma qattiela bla skruplu li juzaw ir-religjon bhala skuza ghal qtil taghom

Christopher Vella

Sep 26th 2012, 13:19

Qatt smajt bl'inkwizizjoni?

Patrick Zammit

Sep 26th 2012, 13:48

You would not have considered yourself fortunate if you had been a Christian living a couple of centuries ago.

Muslims countries are going through the same period Christian countries passed a few hundred years ago.

Nazzareno Cortis

Sep 26th 2012, 14:42

Maria Rosaria-----int qatt smajt bil Plazz ta L-Inkwizitur?????
Fittex,u aqra ghall xiex kien jintuza u minn min!!!!!------Ir-religjonijiet kollha ghandhom taghhom---u kollha f'xi zmien haqru lill innocenti!!!!
Il-bniedem tghallem mhux mir-religjonijiet---imma mal milja taz-zmien------il-bniedem tghallem ghas spejjez tieghu---li bil gwerrer inqatlu,u batew hafna nies innocenti ghall xejn------u ghalhekk irrejalizza li l-ahjar tghix fill-paci ghax mill gwerrer hadd ma rebah----anzi kullhadd tellief----anki dawk li suppost rebhu!!!!!!

Patrick Zammit

Sep 26th 2012, 17:36

M Attard

Both the Bible and the Koran call for murder in the name of god(s). It is written black on white.

A Camilleri

Sep 26th 2012, 13:11

That is blatant appeasement. Should we laud him simply because he did the right thing expected of any civilised perso?. Prosit. This is clear defeatism and the Islamic world has been trying to put the western civilised world on the defence all along.

Etienne Bonanno

Sep 26th 2012, 13:23

If the Imam is stopping violent protests, then he is doing the good and decent thing - something that any leader of men should do. The fact that so many Muslim leaders fail to do it is a bad reflection on those leaders and not a good one on the Imam. Why is it that when Muslims do what any Westerner would take for granted, they are praised to high heaven?

Nobody is saying that the Imam should not criticize and condemn the movie - he has every right and is free to do so. What he does not have any right to do is to suggest that the making of the movie should have been stopped or to suggest that the movie "caused" the bloodbath in some countries. It is the extremist mentality of so many Muslims that "caused" the bloodbath and not a third rate movie that nobody would have even noticed anyway.

I despise the makers of the movie, mind you. I despise them not for denigrating Islam, but for doing so in the full knowledge of what would happen, and doing it in such a way as to implicate the Western World and the U.S. in trouble that they do not need or want.

I despise the extremist murderers even more because they allowed themselves to be used as political pawns so easily.

As for western companies pumping Islamist nations' oil, well, you do know that such countries are the richest in the world thanks to that oil, do you. If the affluence resulting from selling their oil only reaches the top stratum of society in those countries, I think you should blame their leaders rather than the Western companies.
As for Western corrupted governments running their countries...huh?

Joe Borg

Sep 26th 2012, 11:26

Isn't their protest also covered by freedom of expression? Or does that only apply to who ever John Azzopardi approve of??? Funny how that works......

John Azzopoardi

Sep 26th 2012, 11:29

Mr Borg, you are naive indeed. Anyone can protest if they want as long as it is peace and they iimpose their views on us. As many of them do if they have the numbers and the opportunities.

Tatiana Heraghty

Sep 26th 2012, 11:37

@Joe, be careful what you wish for...

Joe Borg

Sep 26th 2012, 12:17

I am just so fed up with double standards.... seriously. How are we to tackle the tension if we on one side argue the right to express hurtful messages, and yet fail to acknowledge others right to reply? If we really want to speak about freedom of expression, then appreciate that it works both ways. Don't hide behind it, but rather look at the reasons for why the response is what it is

I Bugeja

Sep 26th 2012, 12:35

Borg - did you see protests in other western countries?

I agree with freedom of speech but not when it turns violent.

John Azzopoardi

Sep 26th 2012, 12:46

If you are fed up, then that is too bad. WE live in a democarcy and as such we have a right of expression and not as dictated by someone else or set within bounderies. Freedeom of expression is a right but not with flag burning and destruction and killing as we have seen in many of the muslim words or by banner that are outragous. Reason is critical. I am not afraid of today, but for the future as we are now heading into unchartered territory here in Malta.

Joe Borg

Sep 26th 2012, 12:54

and we have violent demonstrations in Copenhagen back in 2009 during the Copenhagen Conference, we had violent demonstrations in London only last year.... we have in our Western Culture and Society a long and strong tradition of violent demonstrations as an expression... Do I agree with violence as a part of expression? Not at all. But is it a part of our culture - very much so.

Thus I find it so ignorant to deal with this situation by saying "we have freedom of expression - deal with it" and then fail to understand that the other "party" is exercising the very same right.... And instead throw around sweeping statements and generalizations about how "wrong" their response is, to put it kindly. Jesus, this is not a case of who got more right of Freedom of Expression, and if it was, who would be the judge of that?? John Azzopardi??

Colin Stanley

Sep 26th 2012, 14:56

I agree with you 100%. give it a few more years , then we will see, as the saying goes, we ain't seen nothing yet.

fred fellon

Sep 26th 2012, 16:51

this imam is nothing but a wolf in sheep clothing, today he is saying no to an organized protest, tomorrow when the muslim population reaches a few thousands , it would be a different story.

A Camilleri

Sep 26th 2012, 13:19

Fact? Of course. More than a fact. Just see where Muslims are a majority. I dont blame them either . That's history. See France and some parts of the UK. History has many instances where minorities first keep quiet and out of the limelight but as own as they gather strength in numbers then addio everything and out comes the sword. Democracy is not something that comes o the surface overnight. Western civilisation fought for it along the years. Islam being a theocracy does not countenance freedom of expression or any freedom at all. It seems it still is in the times of Christian Inquisition.

Rosalie Freestone Bayes

Sep 26th 2012, 16:53

"Freedom of expression is part of western culture"......truly so, and we must nourish it and treasure it.Some people abuse it and use it to provoke others.I firmly believe that it brings with it huge responsibilities,especially in these precarious times.Why go out of one's way to annoy and insult others? we can prove our point by behaving with respect, thus leading by example. I fully disagree with the violence which followed the airing of this film, but to avoid this manic behaviour we need to discipline our free thoughts , words and actions so as not to step on other people's toes and not infringe into their space.....knowing full well what the consequences would be when we omit to do that. Sadly many extremists know no bounds.

A Camilleri

Sep 26th 2012, 13:23

But how naive of you? It's pure and simple opportunism. It's not wise for the Imam or Muslims in Malta to trouble the waters as the majority would take it badly. But......... if there were more Muslims around us, does anyone doubt what the Imam would have done? Not me!!!

Dean Zammit

Sep 26th 2012, 11:02

Other than the fact you're using Wikipedia as a source (of all things), your same "source" also says the complete opposite

"We are greatly concerned that this false notion that an Israeli Jew and 100 Jewish backers were behind the film now has legs and is gathering speed around the world. [...] In an age where conspiracy theories, especially ones of an anti-Semitic nature, explode on the Internet in a matter of minutes, it is crucial for those news organizations who initially reported on his identity to correct the record." Foxman specifically criticized "news organizations across the Arab world and anti-Semites and anti-Israel activists" for continuing to describe the filmmaker and backers as Jewish despite the fact that no Jews were involved in the making of the film.[98]"

source:http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/in_anti_islam_movie_furor_fears_that_a_filmmakers_lies_have_legs (via Wikpedia)


O. Galea

Sep 26th 2012, 10:15

I AGREE WITH YOU TOTALLY...... THE IMAM IN MALTA HAS SHOWN MATURITY AND, ABOVE ALL, WISDOM .

Graham Holme

Sep 26th 2012, 11:01

Islam is the religion of peace?
The number of terrorist attacks since 9/11,world wide,now a approaching 20,000,at an average of five per day,committed by this so called religion,,and you sir claim Islam is "The religion of peace"

J. Vella

Sep 26th 2012, 10:45

agree with you 100%.

Tonio Bugeja

Sep 26th 2012, 10:50

BUT all moslems of goodwill and good intentions are against any form of violence. As much as there are some catholic extremists (in a negligible minority these days) who fought crusades in medivial time in the name of God. Islam must evolve and modernise in a way that action be taken in a civilised way through court action. I am sure that this film offended many people! I will add that as a human being only ( apart from my religion) I will be offended with such a film.

Haroon ali

Sep 26th 2012, 10:17

Well said!!

C Attard

Sep 26th 2012, 10:30

well done for what? for passing a message that muslims were able to get out of hand during a protest?
If a DECENT protest had to be organised, repeat, but peaceful , EVEN I as a CHRISTIAN would have joined the muslims, because I am against any acts against any religion. But here the message was different. we could have protested, got out of hand, and do what others did in other countries..basically our way of protesting... burnt flags & tyres, smashed windows etc, but the Imam stopped us... u ma tarax !!!!!! hekk jonqos issa

paul camilleri

Sep 26th 2012, 11:36

@ C Attard
Sir i will tell you for what he deserves a well done. that message as you call it sir has stemed a demostration in our country.

if he chose he could of sat back and let the muslim population do as it wanted, be it a peacful demostration which could of turned violent and avoided injuries to the general public.

so once again i say well done Mr El Sadi

C. Spiteri

Sep 26th 2012, 12:46

lol isma l-iehor gej bin-Nobel Peace Prize.... easyyyy let's not exaggerate now.

paul camilleri

Sep 26th 2012, 18:35

C Spiteri

Sir you sure don't deserve it, but maybe Mr El Sadi does at the very least it would prove to the Muslim world that his actions were recogniised and justly rewarded and be an inspiration to other muslims prefer violance

sherif suleiman

Sep 26th 2012, 11:12

Dear Mr Mallia

Muslims are not free to do a video about your faith simply because Muslims believe in Jesus Christ (born from a virgin mother) as one of the prophets sent by God to deliver a message to the people. So, muslims mocking your faith is like mocking their own. And the many videos you see on youtube or whatever media are not made by Muslims but by people of your faith or any other faith but Islam. I still believe that the reaction to the video is of a very extreme nature and it only helps to promote the film and the people behind it. I prefer seeing people protesting in the Arab countries to better their economy, to close the gap between the rich and the poor, for better education, better work conditions, safer environments than go about causing loss of human life for a silly movie made by stupid people

Tonio Bugeja

Sep 26th 2012, 10:54

That is not a case of abusing freedom of expression. That is a case of a country not embracing freedom of expression. We go too far then offending others with no barriers or limits!

Robert Borg

Sep 26th 2012, 11:21

Mr. Jampton,
You make an excellent point in your rhetorical question. I do agree that freedom of expression is abused,but when one sees or hears something that is offensive it does not give them license to riot in the streets. When I hear statements such as " discipline the extremely abused freedom of expression" I start getting real nervous. You can't yell "fire" in a theater but I don't think this cheesy you tube video is the same as that.

Advert
Advert