Stabbing was 'act of self-defence'
A Maltese man has pleaded self-defence after stabbing a Libyan national during an argument over damage caused to a car.
Daniel Briffa, 25 of Birkirkara, stands accused of having stabbed Nizar Mustafa Al-Gadi, seriously injuring him in the neck on the night of February 15, 2009.
Mr Al-Gadi is himself currently undergoing court proceedings for allegedly murdering his former partner, lawyer Margaret Mifsud.
The argument between Briffa and Al-Gadi allegedly developed when Al-Gadi confronted the Maltese and accused him of hitting his car's mirror while cycling. The incident happened at Ta' Paris, Birkirkara.
Mr Briffa is arguing that he defended himself from the Libyan. He denies illegal possession of a penknife and breaching public order.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Arthur Mortimer
Sep 24th 2012, 18:27
My nephew was shot in the back nearly 5 years ago and still we wait for the Maltese judiciary to give us a date for a trial and still we wait. We have all the evidence and the person that committed the crime has admitted to it so can somebody tell me why this case has come to court and my family and I still have to wait for justice.
Joe Fenech
Sep 24th 2012, 22:26
Why do you think Malta is a third world country?
Raymond Sammut
Sep 25th 2012, 01:36
@ Arthur Mortimer
It could be because there are two cases here that are to some degree related, and both involve grave bodily harm.
In general, however, the reason for the long delays that many Maltese citizens are being made to endure in the Maltese courts should be clear. The picture shown above is now all too familiar. The picture shows a judiciary complex which is iconic, central and outdated. It was built back in the sixties, and left as is ever since by consecutive governments, while the Maltese population near doubled and became far more demanding.
In my view, Malta needs to revamp its judiciary, and equip the courts with additional complexes distributed among some of the major towns such as Rabat, Birkirkara and Gzira. Valletta should only have to deal with the more complex cases.
Jay Oatmon
Sep 25th 2012, 08:31
The Malta courts are a cash cow for the lawyers and they run the show for their benefit and convenience. They work just three mornings a week (not even a 5 day week) despite a massive backlog of court cases, and many politicians are also lawyers so change is not in their interests.
Any civilised country's court system would be expected to work at least 5 full days each week until the caseload is 'normal' - but this is Malta and the lawyers want to preserve their relaxed lifestyle at the cost of prompt justice.
Dr DeBono was correct and the courts are operated in a complex illogical time wasting manner - which is not acceptable.
I am waiting for one of the parties to confirm it will radically overhaul the ancient courts system of Malta to benefit justice for all.
Please choose the reason of your report below: