Ensuring lift safety
The editorial of September 18 describes the statement made by the Malta Lift Association as “special pleading”. Indeed, it was merely a stark reminder of the reality which the leader itself described as “a laissez faire attitude to safety and its regulation”.
The association’s only objective is to promote lift safety. It has no interest in furthering any commercial interests but, rather, it is interested in ensuring that the lift sector becomes safe. Hence, there is no “special pleading” and, certainly, no ulterior motive, as the editorial seems to imply, behind the association’s so-called “allegations”.
Furthermore, the editorial enquires whether “unregistered lifts (are) by definition ‘potentially unsafe’”. Firstly, the association did not brand all unregistered lifts simply “unsafe” but, rather, as “potentially unsafe”. In other words, an unregistered lift may potentially pose risks that registered lifts do not.
An unregistered lift may be so because it would have been certified after installation and, hence, not have been tested by a notified body and declared to be safe. Also, an unregistered lift is not being preventively inspected and, hence, lacks the yearly inspection (in the case of a residence).
Contrary to the impression given by the editorial, it is not the chief duty of the authorities to ensure proper compliance. The lift owner or condominium administrator, no different from a car owner, is the prime actor in ensuring the safety of his own lift.
The authorities inspect and enforce the law but the first point of departure for lift safety rests with the installer (up to the point of putting into service and certification) and, subsequently, the lift owner.
Lift owners are also encouraged to be vigilant and to ensure that, for lifts installed after July 1, 2002, lift installers hand over the technical files complete with the certificate of conformity issued by the notified body that would have inspected and certified the lift.
For lifts put into service before July 1, 2002, the lift owner (or condominium administrator) has the duty to register the lift.
The association has, over the years, worked together with the authorities and cooperated as much as possible over various issues regarding lift safety.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Peter Murray
Sep 22nd 2012, 12:40
Furthermore,the claim that lift owners are "encouraged " to ensure that any lift's certicate of conformity and any technical files (what these are is not disclosed)are handed over by the lift installers and that such requiremens are not enshrined in legislation -as how effetcive is this ENCOURAGEMENT (and what form does this take?)if not consrtained by law to be implemented and that compliance is not legally ensured by the authorities is immensely disconcerting and a lacks a robust ,vigorous or accountable approach to ensuring lift safety .
Peter Murray
Sep 22nd 2012, 10:22
Why wait to go public with these claims of lack of compliance with EU standards and regulations by rogue lift installers(aka non-members of the MLA) until an injury occurred and a possible worst case scenario-as I never heard this addressed nor explained in this resposne -except for an obscure reference to having "worked together with the authorities" but not the public or lift owners apparently?Also the analogy between the responsibilities of a lift owner and a car owner is crass and obtuse .
Please choose the reason of your report below: