Advert

Court throws out disgraced chairman’s application against minister, Gozo Channel

Dr Grech with Finance Minister Tonio Fenech

Dr Grech with Finance Minister Tonio Fenech

A court this morning threw out a request for the issue of a prohibitory injunction made by Gozo Channel's former chairman Joseph Grech.

Dr Grech had applied for the post of CEO after having previously been forced to resign his chairmanship when it emerged he had directed a ferry to return to port and pick him up after arriving late.  In applying for the vacant post, Joseph Grech had said he was "the most qualified person for the job".

Gozo Channel told Dr Grech his application (one of two received) could not be entertained due to last November's incident.

Dr Grech had sought a judicial injunction to stop Gozo Channel issuing another call for applications for the CEO’s post and give him the job.

In its considerations however, the court noted that according to evidence, Gozo Channel had effectively aborted the recruitment process and a fresh call was being issued.

The fact that Dr Grech had served as chairman did not mean he should be given the post of CEO. Furthermore, he had other ways to make his case without the need to stop the recruitment process through a warrant of prohibitory injunction.  

Advert

38 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr leo attard

Sep 17th 2012, 21:04

Iagree with your argument on grech's actions does not mean incompetence, however grech's ordering a ferry to return to pick him up is not based on hearsay; it was reported in the media and grech resigned admitting that he wasnt aware timetables had changed ( that is incompetence, mind you) and even so it does not justify his actions which reflects arrogance and the feeling that being the chairman makes you above professional rules and ethics..... the guy has a chip on his shoulder the size of the rock of gibraltar

Anthony Scicluna

Sep 17th 2012, 15:25

Errrmmmm, don't you recall that Dr Grech is incompetent because he abused of his position and that is why he was dismissed in the first place?

Kevin Sciberras

Sep 17th 2012, 19:56

And these are the people who lead the country

Joe Borg

Sep 17th 2012, 17:19

Common sense has got nothing to do with this! Its a legal issue, meaning what is right should remain right irrispective of compounding issues

Anthony Scicluna

Sep 17th 2012, 15:26

Why? Didnt the present administration give him the boot? Decide please

Charles Micallef

Sep 17th 2012, 15:33

Anthony Scicluna

The present admin gave him the boot because of public outcry and because he was exposed by the press and delayed passengers on the faithful trip!!

Joe Borg

Sep 17th 2012, 17:18

Dear Charles,

I seriously doubt you have the faintest idea of what the true facts are. The ferry arrived on time. PASSENGERS DIDNT SUFFER ANY DELAY WHATSOEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe Borg

Sep 17th 2012, 15:15

Dear Mr Attard,
your comment above is just a reflection of the pure ignorance present in this country.
"His arrogance is reflected in the fact that he doesnt even want others to apply" - What on earth do you want to mean by that comment? During no instant in this whole issue was this true!!!!! All that was done was a simple call for application. 2 people applied, one was ineligible, meaning DR GRECH WAS THE MOST QUALIFIED PERSON FOR THE JOB. Read and understand what is written before you blurt out nonsense.

Emmanuel Marmara'

Sep 17th 2012, 19:09

Well said Mr.Attard..........and.......Mr.Borg, do you happen to be a relative or what ????!!!!!!!!!
You are all out in armour to defend him...If you were ONE happy customer, the rest ( majority ) are not.

Mr leo attard

Sep 17th 2012, 21:14

@ Joe Borg --- the article says Grech does not want another call for applications, which means he does not want others to apply. And if there were 2 people who applied and one was ineligible, what makes you think that Grech is eligible? His actions that led to his dismissal makes him automatically ineligible. Let me put it this way --- imagine I am a teacher who gets dismissed for abusing a student and then I apply for a headmaster's job and insist that I should get that post. What is strange to me is that grech's application was even accepted --- he should have never been let to apply . But perhaps you can enlighten me on the matter, you seem to have inside knowledge.

Anne Farrugia

Sep 17th 2012, 14:15

Oh! Please! What has being a Nationalist or Labour got to do with it? I am certain that the Labour party has people who are ultra cheeky as well. Please, you require a ruler to think straight! Have a good day!

Marie Borg

Sep 17th 2012, 14:05


I?
'm sorry l fail to see the comparison.

Joseph Caruana

Sep 17th 2012, 14:19

50% of the population are discriminated under one party, the other 50% is discriminated under the other. Some one ignorant , can say, there is a fair balance. The doctrine of the common good and the well being of al, is only in our text books.

J Scicluna

Sep 17th 2012, 13:32

Working for the government in a high position is one thing whilst being the regular employee shows the other side of the picture. I know what I am talking about!!

A. Sciberras

Sep 17th 2012, 12:03

well said mr. vella!

Paul Bajada

Sep 17th 2012, 13:46

they need to create jobs for the blue eyed boys somehow! whether they are qualified for the job or not, whether they have the integrity or not, whether they have the right attitude or not.

fact is, the 20,000 job creation statistics must be "invented from somewhere". Guess what? I bet you this position alone counted already at least as two or three jobs in the 20,000 job statistics....

Advert
Advert