PM condemns Libya murder
Chris Stevens
The murder that took place in Libya was to be condemned in the most clear way, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said.
He said he hoped this would not cast shadows on the progress of Libya in its path towards democracy.
He expressed solidarity towards US authorities and victims families.
Dr Gonzi was speaking during a conference on lessons learnt during the Libya crisis.
It brings together members of the public service who contributed during the crisis.
The US government is investigating whether the attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi in which America's ambassador Chris Stevens was gunned down was a planned terrorist strike to mark the anniversary of the September 11 2001 attacks.
27 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
martin chetcuti
Sep 13th 2012, 18:25
ANY Religion Extremism is one ugly monster Voltaire put it brilliantly when he said ''What can you say to a man who tells you he prefers obeying God rather than men, and that as a result he's certain he'll go to heaven if he cuts your throat ”
Martin Cassar
Sep 13th 2012, 14:49
Little is being mentioned about the action and loads has been published about the reaction!
Well, I totally agree with Dr. Gonzi as the killing of an innocent soul is never justified. However on a separate yet well-connected note I would like to ask Dr. Gonzi, do Muslims in Libya Egypt or in any other Arab or Muslim country have the right to get offended over that stupid film which was financed by the Zionists and made in the USA by that bank bankrupted property developers who sponsored the idea 'how to offend Muslims'?
I ask this question and the echo of Dr. Gonzi's anger over Gaddafi-like picture still in my ears!
martin chetcuti
Sep 13th 2012, 18:12
@Martin Cassar
What is wrong Mr.Cassar is that these extremists don't limit themselves to protests when they get offended but turn up to violence and that is highly deplorable..full stop.
And please leave your conspiracy theories regarding Al Qaeda and Zionists to some Hollywood director..
Eric Sammut
Sep 13th 2012, 14:21
As Patrick Henry once said "Give me liberty or give me death." Freedom comes at a price worth fighting for. The only problem is some people don't know what to be free means. A good example is found here within the comments from individuals believing the Libyans were better off under Gaddafi. I guess things like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to pursue happiness mean nothing to the arrogant not living under freedom. It’s a dam shame with all the means we have available to learn these days we still have people who believe tyranny is a solution.
Richard Galea
Sep 13th 2012, 13:59
Ask the benghazi people if they were better under Gaddafi, one event i mention when he ordered the war tanks to enter and bombard the local benghazi people.
mario gellel
Sep 13th 2012, 12:49
li tizra tahsad, sur gonzipn. Werqa hazina go gnien rajtuha hazina, biex issa ghandkom ghalqa imharbta.
Christopher Grech
Sep 13th 2012, 11:19
The Israelis love to have true murders and sound the war trumpet thereafter.
Google for General Wesley Clark and middle East war. You would find a shocker. The US military was going in 7 countries in 5 years after 911. It look longer than 5 years but Afganistand and Iraq was taken. Lebanon, and Iran were not yet.
The Mossad planned to send armament to fuel the Arab Spring. The greater the turmoil the better for the Ashkenazi Jews. Divide and conquer or regime change to were you want it to be? Time will tell.
This is a guaranteed good read: -
http://www.911nwo.com/12-27%20added/9_11%20as%20Jewish%20lightning.pdf
Charles Carabott
Sep 13th 2012, 11:18
jibqa il fatt li il poplu Libyan kien ahjar meta kien hemm Gadaffi milli issa. il majjoranza tal poplu Libyan terrorizat mil gangs armati li qed jikontrolaw il Libya issa
c scudi
Sep 13th 2012, 11:01
My waters tell me that this was all planned outside of Libya and designed to destabalise the present Regime.It smells...
M Cachia
Sep 13th 2012, 12:31
Exactly. According to Sky this morning it is likely either Al Qaeda or old remnants of the Gaddafi regime who used the situation as cover. The attack was too well coordinated to be spontaneous and goes against the norm of anti-American protests (burn a flag/destroy a building but leave people alone)
John Portelli
Sep 13th 2012, 10:55
An Israeli started this mess.
Martin Cole
Sep 13th 2012, 11:19
Do you remember 'Life of Brian', that was insulting to many many Christians, did the Christians go out and murder the people who's idea it was to film? No...
As for the comment an Israeli started this mess, actually there are over 19,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11, and they have been carried out by Muslims in the name of Islam. Lets see you try and blame this on the Israeli's.
M Cachia
Sep 13th 2012, 12:29
Actually that has turned out to be a lie - the Guy is an Egyptian Coptic (Christian). The whole thing was aimed to make trouble and is darker than it seems (why else translate to Arabic and post it to you tube months after the film was released). It is likely politically motivated too considering the US election approaching soon.
Victor Pulis
Sep 13th 2012, 09:49
According to Libyan doctors Mr. Stephens died from smoke inhalation and was not gunned down.
Jon Vercellono
Sep 13th 2012, 10:20
Smoke inhalation as the result of a grenade being fired into a building and setting fire to it (not an accidental fire).
James Tyrrell
Sep 13th 2012, 10:22
Oh well, that's okay then!
Jon Vercellono
Sep 13th 2012, 10:45
gunned down could be used as a metaphor in this case - the Ambassador died as a result of a grenade (not the shrapnel but the residual effects, i.e. smoke).
Victor Pulis
Sep 13th 2012, 12:43
I never said it's ÓK' or that it was an accident. I just pointed out that he was not gunned down. He was asphyxiated by smoke resulting from the terroristic attack. For the record I still think it's barbarous.
John Borg
Sep 13th 2012, 18:34
Yes thats very true,,,,,,
Malcolm Seychell
Sep 13th 2012, 09:35
Dear Prime Minister. Together with Sarkozy, the EU and Nato you took a wrong decision to back the rebels.
It was clear from day one that these are only fundamentalist islamic extremists.
Joseph Cauchi Senior
Sep 13th 2012, 10:03
@ Malcolm Seychell,
Why do you always have to come out with ‘intelligent’ observations?
JC.
Joe Degiorgio
Sep 13th 2012, 10:21
Malcolm,
I believe there's more than meets the eye going on in Libya. The rebels may have had a just cause but there may be other forces at work that want to reap advantage of the situation, create instability, discredit the new administration and reign in the ensuing confusion.
Just my humble opinion.
Carmel (Nenu) Aquilina
Sep 13th 2012, 10:30
@ Alla ħares f' malta jkollna politiċi bħalek, Sur Seychell!
Politiku serju qatt ma għandu jifraħ b' ġrajja daqshekk kera!
Ir-Ribelli ma kienu ħadd għajr il-maġġioranza tal-poplu Libjan maħqur, imsawwat, imbiċċer, u maqtul mit-tirania tal-familja Gaddafi!
Allura inti lill dawn it-tiranni familja Gaddafi tappoġja Sur Malcolm Seychell?
Prositt Sur Prim Ministru, il-Maltin u l-Għawxin huma kburin bid-deċiżjonijiet li ħadt fil-kwistjoni tal-Libja, u bil-għajununa li pajjiżna permezz tiegħek dejjem ta lill-poplu libjan u lill kull minn kien jinħtieġa!
Joselle Camilleri
Sep 13th 2012, 10:55
Malcolm, I have to disagree with you on this one. There is a lot more than meets the eye in Libya. You also have to understand that you will find opportunists everywhere, even in causes that often start out with genuine intentions and then finish with the same sort of political bundle. Only time will tell and it's still early. I am really sorry for this poor man and his family. Diplomacy does not always pay, alas.
Victor Pulis
Sep 13th 2012, 12:46
There is always the question of culture and religion plays a big part in it. When the fighting ended in |libya i wrote that the real war was just beginning. I knew that the rebel factions would want their pound of flesh. The populace is still armed to the teeth and one spark could set the country ablaze once more.
gil falzon
Sep 13th 2012, 12:53
Well the Western govenments are beholden to their electorates which have an increasing number of sympathisers of islamic expansionism/blind liberals so what does one expect?
John Borg
Sep 13th 2012, 18:47
Mr.Seychell why are u addressing the Prime Minister, and Sarkozy, and the EU???? Its true that they gave the Libyans some sort of help,, but don't forget,,that the libyans paid all this with there own blood....This barbarous act is from the people from the old Regime,,because they still believe in the Tyrant, Murderer Gaddafi....They don't want the Libyans to live in peace,,,
Please choose the reason of your report below: