Couples blame investment firm for losing their life savings
Four couples have filed a judicial letter against All Invest Company Limited and its manager, claiming they had lost their life savings after being mis-sold financial products.
Vincent and Carmen Spiteri, Joseph and Doris Borg, Marthese and Gino Cremona and Joseph and Deborah Borg said they had invested a total of more than €43,000 and were now calling on the company to reimburse them.
Lawyer Stefano Filletti, representing the couples, said his clients had lost their life savings because of “abusive and misleading behaviour” by the company.
One couple had invested a lump-sum pension which they wanted to secure for their disabled daughter to use after their death.
Dr Filletti said the Malta Financial Services Authority last month upheld their claim and ruled that All Invest had acted incorrectly and in an abusive manner when it sold the financial product to the four couples.
The MFSA also made several remarks about shortcomings by All Invest in the sale of these financial products.
Dr Filletti called on the company to reimburse the funds with interest and compensation for the damages suffered.
12 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Simon Vella
Sep 14th 2012, 09:57
I hate to contradict some of the comments below but in my 18 years of experience in the finance industry I have noted that banks are not always the safest form of investment. Far from it. This has been proven many times over. If we look at recent history we can see the Lehman brothers' case and closer to home the elder folks will surely remember Bical Bank.
Not all banks are the same and as always there is a risk / reward ratio which has to be respected. The higher the interest = the higher the risk. It's simple. There has to be a reason for anybody to offer higher than average interest rates be it a bank / bond / fund etc etc usually this translates that they must have a higher than average risk. In today's climate anything more than 3% from a bank IS risky and that is a fact. If the bank you are talking to comes out with the excuse that "don't worry, if we go bankrupt there is always the government €100,000 security" is showing you that they lack faith in their ability to cover the debts and should set alarm bells ringing
Many might not agree because they want to believe that there MUST be someone with a magic wand out there that gives a guaranteed high rate of return, with no risk on capital and no charges but these people are usually just setting themselves up for disappointment.
P Pace Balzan
Sep 14th 2012, 08:55
Extract : "Dr Filletti said the Malta Financial Services Authority last month upheld their claim and ruled that All Invest had acted incorrectly and in an abusive manner when it sold the financial product to the four couples."
.
If this is the case why did the MFSA not publish their findings on their website ?:
http://mfsa.com.mt/pages/AdministrativeMeasuresPenalties.aspx
Jesmond Chetcuti
Sep 14th 2012, 08:36
`the past is not a gurantee of the future` in small print....remember that always...
Joseph Ellul
Sep 14th 2012, 06:55
Another one of those claims that will end in "Anno Mai"!!!
Joseph Bajada
Sep 14th 2012, 06:36
We all pitch about banks and the low interest the pay , but they have other product which pay a reasonable interest with the added security of bring a bank not some shoddy goose who invests your hard earnedmnew and if it fail its your fault because he told somewhere in that contact that he is not responsable .
Ronald Cauchi
Sep 14th 2012, 12:00
Oh yes Banks ( which shall remain nameless) sell you Property Funds that go bust at the drop of a hat.
Mario Cassar
Sep 14th 2012, 14:12
Mr Bajada, outfits like All Invest would invest your money in a bank or sicav abroad, same as local banks would do, so your argument is not valid. The famous BOV fund that went bust actually had invested money in Lehman Brothers, which was one of the world's largest investment banks. There is no disadvantage to investing through a small broker instead of a big bank.
John Azzopoardi
Sep 13th 2012, 23:30
Be care ful where you invest. As everyone knows, nothing is more safer in banks, If you invest with someone that is not a bank, you are investing at your own risk.
Adrian P. Cassar
Sep 14th 2012, 08:28
Dear John,
When you need to save cash for the long term, keeping them in a bank will make you lose money because of inflation. The interest rates given by banks is always less than the inflation rate. Therefore if you have a year's salary saved in 1980 you will have LESS than a year's salary in 2012!! Shares on the other hand follow inflation and usually grow even faster. A year's salary of shares in many US large companies in 1980 would make you very very rich today. However one has to spread the investment, because if you bought Enron or Kodak shares only you would lose everything!
This court case is not about losing your investment through bad luck, but being MIS-SOLD investment products. MFSA has stated that these coupes were sold these products incorrectly and abusively. That is surely not bad luck!!!
john muscat
Sep 13th 2012, 22:10
Now we will judge how the courts will decide. Hope that justice is done to these couples.
mark borg
Sep 13th 2012, 21:47
I think that MFSA is also responsable for not shuting them down,although I am not sure if this is within their remitt.
As just warning the public that this organisation was not licenced is surely not enough, someone should be responsable to ensure that their operations are ceased and not left operating.
carmel muscat
Sep 13th 2012, 21:17
ma nafx kif ma hadux parir profesjonalli qabel ivestew flusom - - - - - -
Please choose the reason of your report below: