Advert

KMB: Mintoff was against freezing talks with the EU in 1996

Dom Mintoff had disagreed with the Labour government's decision to freeze EU membership talks in 1996,  Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici said today.

Writing in l-orizzont, Dom Mintoff's successor said: When the Nationalist Party lost the 1996 general election, Mintoff did not agree that the Labour government should stop the talks with the EU.

"He was of the view that the government should seize the opportunity presented by the EU membership talks to persuade the EU to reach an agreement with Malta, not for membership, but for an association in various sectors so that the union could help Malta reduce the huge debt which the Nationalist governments of 1987 and 1992 had run up."

Dr Mifsud Bonnici said the said that Mr Mintoff's Front Maltin Inqumu had also disagreed with the line taken by the Kampanja Helsien Nazzjonali which had been against the resumption of EU membership talks by the new Nationalist government in 1998.

Mr Mintoff's position was different from those of the PN, the PL or the Kampanja Helsien Nazzjonali. His position was that that the EU wanted Malta within its fold, and Malta should therefore exploit that situation. He was convinced that he could lead the EU to accept an association with Malta without Malta actually becoming a member, Dr Mifsud Bonnici said.

It was bad luck for Malta that Mr Mintoff could not lead the talks with the EU, Dr Mifsud Bonnici added. He did what he could, and even had talks with (EU Commission President) Romano Prodi in Brussels in 2003. But Prof Prodi said the EU could not discuss what he was advocating, once the government had adopted a different line.

As a result, the only choice which the people had in the EU referendum was not really between membership or partnership, but membership or nothing, Dr Mifsud Bonnic said.  And nothing was interpreted as meaning that Malta would have been isolated.

Dr Mifsud Bonnici said it was shameful that the Nationalists had not utilised Mr Mintoff's negotiating skills in their talks with the EU, even though it was thanks to him that they were in a position to reopen the talks in 1998.

Advert

66 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Peter Bonello

Aug 31st 2012, 08:20

i agree!!

Anthony Scicluna

Aug 31st 2012, 10:26

"I am sure things would have been different"

Prove it.

Everyone argues well with hindsight. Had it not been for the global crisis, we would have said, in hindsight, that EU membership was the all and be all of our woes. If Dr Mifsud Bonnici was privy to Mr Mintoff's position, why does he come out with it now?

Don't we always say to ourselves, if I chose differently this could have happened. The issue is that we didnt choose differently and therefore in our dimension it didnt happen. Big deal!

F. Mercieca

Aug 31st 2012, 10:03

I agree with you. I never swallowed the fact that Mintoff revolted against the PL because of the Cospicua Marina. That was only an excuse. Mintoff in his forecast, for which he was unique, believed that it was not in Malta's best interest to be isolated. But I also believe that he wanted the PL to negotiate Malta's joining the EU. On the other hand I am certainly positive that he was also against Malta being a colony of Germany.

Nazzareno Cortis

Aug 31st 2012, 13:13

Farrugia----correction----u nikkwota kliemek-----"U hallini, msieken ahna fi ftit xhur ohra, fiex ha jgibuh il-pajjiz dan nies"---
Zgur li mhux se jgibuh ghar milli gabuh in-nazzjonalisti-----mimli dejn-----weghdi li ma nzammux----ecc.ecc.!
Inutli tipprova tbezza' ghax kollu ghalxejn!!!!Il-poplu ilu li xaba' min din l-amministrazzjoni-----anki l-grupp parlamentari nazzjonalista mhux jaqblu ma tmexxijja prezenti!!!!
Serrah rasek---zmien it-twerwir spicca!!!!

Richard Caruana

Aug 31st 2012, 06:48

Buy a new keyboard with lower case letters please. Hate people who shout

Mario Farrugia

Aug 31st 2012, 08:50

A pity you're not leading our country!

Karl Brincat

Aug 31st 2012, 09:03

Dear Eddy we got much more out of the EU hanini ..definitely more than 1 million your Labour Party tried to bluff its way around... WE GOT MILLIONS !! SO PLEASE GIVE UP ON THIS ONE.

Karl Consiglio

Aug 30th 2012, 21:51

Le dak missu waqaf wara r-Republika. Quit while you're on top.

He apponited KMB because he knew he was going to lose bigtime next time round.

And Mintoff was one bad loser, even in just a game of bocci.

Karl Consiglio

Aug 30th 2012, 21:33

When youre dead it doesnt make a difference because youre dead.

Lawrence Fenech

Aug 31st 2012, 01:47

@Emmanuel.

You cannot bury history, it follows you like a shadow.

Mario Vella

Aug 30th 2012, 20:27

Prosit Mr Grech agree 100%

Karl Consiglio

Aug 30th 2012, 21:39

Mintoff was an impatient bully.

Borg Olivier, by comparrison, had a more slowly but surely gentleman's attitude that did more for us as we all know.. Got us our Independence...And Mintoff was very jealous of this.

Lawrence Fenech

Aug 31st 2012, 01:49

@Philip.

Prosit, Dom Mintoff kien lussu ghal Malta.

Philip Grech

Aug 31st 2012, 06:37

Sur Consiglio,
Jien ma ridtx inqabblu ma hadd gha jidhirli li mhux sewwa, imm'issa ha nghidlek. Mintoff ma kien ghajjur ghal hadd minhabba l-Indipendenza ghax hu witta t-triq ghaliha. Forsi ddispjacieh li wara dak l-inkwiet kollu ma l-Inglizi ra x'kienu l-kundizzjonijiet li gab Borg Olivier wara; per ezempju tliet xhur bla waqfien jiddiskuti ma l-Inglizi gewwa Londra.

Mr Kevin Zammit

Aug 30th 2012, 21:55

its a good quote but when you quote you should always quote in full not the parts that are convenient for your beliefs

"Illum hemm żewġ Ewropi: L-Ewropa ta' Kain u l-Ewropa ta' Abel. L-Ewropa ta' Kain moħħha biex tikkonkwista u l-Ewropa ta' Abel hija progressiva. Huwa ma' din l-Ewropa li xi darba rridu nilħqu ftehim."

http://mt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dom_Mintoff

i certainly do not think I'm up to the task of adding anything to that

Richard Caruana

Aug 31st 2012, 06:55

@ K Zammit

Missek zidt li l-Ewropa progressiva ghal Mintoff kienet dik ta' Ceaușescu, u ohrajn bhal Josip Broz Tito. U l-prova qieghda li lid-dittatur Ceaușescu, li niesu kellhom inehhuh b'rivluzzjoni, kien tah Gieh ir-Repubblika! Bhalu kien ta lil Gaddafi, ghax dak kien ta' l-Afrika progressiva wkoll.

Nasal biex nippreferi l-Ewropa l-ohra.

C Sant

Aug 31st 2012, 08:01

@ Kevin

L'ewropa ta Abel: Hungary, Bulgaria, Czech republic, Slovenia, Slovakia, Romania, east Germany, Latvia, lithuania, Estonia = EU, others Ukraine, Serbia, Bosnia, montenegro, FY Macedonia, Croatia, Albania seeking Eu membership. The remaining country, the ex soviet union, disintegrated and disappeared in Malta, 1989! So actually the "progressive" Europe is today part of the Eu, l'ewropa ta Cain!

Stop inventing myths, repeating old myths and let us start calling a spade a spade! If you want to go back to live the 70's and early 80's, just take a ticket to Cuba and leave us in peace.

Eddy Privitera

Aug 30th 2012, 21:03

Joseph E. Briffa: When a country joins the Eu, it doesn't just accepts the existing rules of the club, but accepts ALL OTHER FUTURE RULES, without knowing what those rules are going to be !

Look at those countries which entered into a partnership agreement with the EU, such as Switzerland, for example. It is just bound by the various agreements on various sectors which it signed with the EU. The EU has no right to add on any other regulations etc.. without an agreement reached with Switzerland. That is the best agreement we could have made with the Eu. And this is what Dom Mintoff must have wanted, according to KMB who knows very well what Mintoff wanted !

Mary Ann Borg

Aug 30th 2012, 22:48

You just dont get it do you Sur Privitera? The Malta in the Mediterranean idea was totally squashed by the Maltese both in the referendum and the following election in 1998.
It also just shows that Mintoff's and Alfred Sant's positions were almost identical. Both didnt want EU membership and both wanted to sign some form of agreement with the EU, short of membership. Remember Lejber's ' No to Full Membership' - Le ghal shubija shiha fl-Unjoni Ewropea'?. That died the moment the majority of the Maltese opted for a proper membership, a membership that you and Lejber still reject (some secretly , others more openly like you) and yet you have neither realized nor accepted even that simple fact.

J Martinelli

Aug 31st 2012, 15:07

Yes Michael borg, Malta always 'needs' and 'wants' and 'expects' and 'demands', Better still, 'Jew b'xejn, jew xejn'! In other words, accept charity and offer nothing in return, very much like we were in the 70s and 80s. We should look forward to paying back some to the EU because that will prove that we finally are capable of standing on our two feet, our economy brisk enough to yield a surplus and that we are truly democratic and willing to give a hand at the overall prosperity of the EU.
Our 'strategic' position is accidental and in today's terms quite inconsequential. We cannot sell our strategic position, but we can reap secondary benefits from it such as record tourist visits, climatic benefits and the like.
Of course we should all thank Labour supporters who voted for joining the EU and it is for this very reason that these same Labour supporters will ensure, come next election, that the Labour Party which has accidentally let slip its intentions of reopening negotiations with the EU, will stay on the Opposition benches one more time.
It is the voters who have to prove that they value democracy and not any political party, principally the Labour Party!

carlos ellul

Aug 30th 2012, 19:20

Switzerland, Norway.....

This 'small nation' mentality was the one used to deter us from leaving colonialism and gain our freedom. Time and time again we've proven that we're not as insignificant as the typical foreigner's ruffian think we are.

Regarding negotiating with the EU for a better/different deal, well who knows what those negotiations would have achieved in the first place. Maybe we wouldn't have spared our country this ridiculous situation were immigrants are forced to stay here against their will and our MEPs are reduced to beggars pleading with the big guys so that they will take 10 of these resources out of our hands. We never had these sort of problems before didn't we?

Mr Joe Micallef

Aug 30th 2012, 19:51

Carlos Ellul you may not know, but Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein pay the EU to enjoy selected freedoms enjoyed by EU members. In a nutshell the conditions are set by the EU.

You may wish to look up some info on EFTA before writing further. Quite obviously the PL was never interested in EFTA.

carlos ellul

Aug 30th 2012, 21:17

Three of those countries are in a better financial position then the majority of Europe. No one argues that it would have been a give and take situation. However I think that a good negotiator would have considered all options at hand.

Jimmy Ventura

Aug 30th 2012, 20:33

With all due respect to the Seniors here, I must comment that the same people that when KMB was the Prime Minister of Malta you did not believe a word he said so much so that you used to call him Zero. Now with all due respect to KMB, that he has absolutely no say in the PL you want us to believe that he is in power.
If you feel so happy to fool yourself this way, then enjoy it. Kullhadd kuntent, kullhadd ferhan!

Eddy Privitera

Aug 30th 2012, 21:10

Karl Consiglio: Jaqaw qatt ma taqra xejn x'jiktbu opinjonisti, ekonomisti u gurnalisti barranin , dwar l-UE u specjalment dwar l-ewro ?

Karl Consiglio

Aug 31st 2012, 10:48

Of course I do, what are you refering to?

Mario Vella

Aug 30th 2012, 18:28

KMB said that Mintoff would have continued with the talks but change directions. That's all you have to understand.Is that so hard to understand? In my opinion if one really looks at it in an objective way,it is relevant!

Mr Tony Gatt

Aug 30th 2012, 18:42

@ Mario Vella

Sorry, but with the E.U. you are either in or you are out. There is no half-way house. Norway, for example is not in but trades with the E.U. However, that means tarriffs are put on Norwegian goods and produce, such as oil, fish, gas etc.
Malta was hardly in a stong negiating position.

M. Mifsud

Aug 30th 2012, 19:05

@ Mr Tony Gatt.

Qed tara kemm tifhem Sur Gat!. Mela int hsiebt li l-EU ma tapprezzax u ma tevalwax l-importanza ta' Malta bhala gzira f'nofs il-Meditterran, bhala bridge bejn l-Ewropa u l-Afrika? Ezatt fit-tarf ta' l-Ewropa? Pozizzjoni strategika aktar minn hekk? Li kieku l-gvern gharaf jisfrutta dan il-vantagg, kieku Malta kien ikollha dak li l-Inglizi jsejjhu 'a strong negotiating position'. Pero' il-Gvern Nazzjonalista ghazel li jkun laqghi u ara x'hadna. Imma kollhu ta' xejn. Issa l-froga lesta.

Tony Borg

Aug 30th 2012, 19:10

Yes Tony what about Switzerland..............they were asked to negotiate and join just like us but they did not opt to join till this day and they are in a better position than us for sure.

Mr Tony Gatt

Aug 30th 2012, 21:05

@ M. Mifsud
The E.U. is about trade. Malta can't be neutral and be strategically important to the E.U. You can't have it both ways. It was important to the British but times have moved on.
Tony Borg- Norway said 'no thanks' to the E.U. and it says it is better off. Many people in the U.K. would like to return to the Common Market- a completely different concept to a Federal Europe run by Germany, which incidentally was what Hitler wanted.

m borg

Aug 31st 2012, 00:48

Le.

Advert
Advert