Cannabis may leave permanent damage

Teenagers who become hooked on cannabis before they reach 18 may be causing lasting damage to their intelligence, memory and attention, according to the results of a large, long-term study.
Researchers from Britain and the US found that persistent and dependent use of cannabis before the age of 18 may have a so-called neurotoxic effect, but heavy pot use after 18 appears to be less damaging to the brain.
Terrie Moffitt, a psychology and neuroscience professor at King ’s College London’s Institute of Psychiatry, said the scope and length of the study, which involved more than 1,000 people followed up over 40 years, gave its findings added weight.
“It’s such a special study that I’m fairly confident cannabis is safe for over-18 brains, but risky for under-18 brains,” she said.
Before the age of 18 the brain is still being organised and remodelled to become more efficient and may be more vulnerable to damage from drugs, she added.
Prof. Moffitt worked with Madeleine Meier, a post-doctoral researcher at Duke University in the US, to analyse data on 1,037 New Zealanders who took part in the study. About 96 per cent of the original participants stuck with the study from 1972 to today, she said.
At age 38, all participants were given a battery of psychological tests to assess their memory, processing speed, reasoning and visual processing.
Those who had used pot persistently as teens scored significantly worse in most of the tests. Friends and relatives regularly interviewed as part of the study were more likely to report that the heavy cannabis users had attention and memory problems such as losing focus and forgetting to do tasks.
The researchers also found that people who started using cannabis in adolescence and continued for years afterwards showed an average decline in Intelligence Quotient (IQ) test scores of 8 points between the ages of 13 and 38. “Study subjects who didn’t take up pot until they were adults with fully-formed brains did not show similar mental declines,” Prof. Moffitt said.
She said the decline in IQ could not be explained by alcohol or other drug use or by having less education, and Dr Meier said the key variable was the age when people began to use pot.
Dr Meier said the study’s message was clear: “Marijuana is not harmless, particularly for adolescents.”
While eight IQ points may not sound like a lot on a scale where 100 is the mean, Dr Meier said an IQ drop from 100 to 92 would mean dropping from being in the 50th percentile to being in the 29th.
Higher IQs also correlate with higher levels of education and income, better health and longer lives, she said. “Somebody who loses eight IQ points as an adolescent may be disadvantaged ... for years to come,” she added.
Robin Murray, a professor of psychiatric research at King’s Institute of Psychiatry, who was not involved, said the study was impressive. The findings should be taken “very seriously”.
“It is, of course, part of folklore among young people that some heavy users of cannabis seem to gradually lose their abilities and end up achieving much less than one would anticipate,” he said. “This provides one explanation as to why this might be the case.”
Previous research on cannabis use has also pointed to potential long-term psychiatric effects.
A study published in March last year found that people who use it a lot in their youth dramatically increase their risk of psychotic symptoms, and that continued use of the drug can increase the risk of developing a psychotic disorder.
Dr Meier pointed out that it was not possible to say from this latest study what a safer age for persistent pot use might be, or what kind of dosage level causes the damage.
According to the 2011 United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC) global drugs report, which used data from 2009, between 2.8 and 4.5 per cent of the world’s population aged 15 to 64 – or between 125 and 203 million people – had used cannabis at least once in the previous 12 months.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Roberto Angelone
Aug 30th 2012, 15:32
mmm...Weight lifting at an early age may stun your growth (vertically)... so using the same logic, Should We Criminalise Gravity?
The main problem here to be dealt with is not the potential harm of a substance. It is the Criminalisation of the use of a substance...that's wrong I'm sorry...of no help at all...& a very pathetic deterrent...Educate, classify, give people the benefit of the doubt...who know maybe not every cannabis smoker is a hopeless drug addict...take Carl Sagan for example...does he ever seem to lose his brilliance? No. Well being the sceptic he was with a scientific way to verify things...he actually wrote papers "intoxicated" with cannabis & presented them to determine whether his cognitive functions & judgement were impaired...they were not. The wonders without are sought in the wonders within...so let's call a spade a spade ...Cannabis...THC psychoactive...CBD balances it out....also similar substances are found in breast milk & are intended to have the same effects...i.e. appetite stimulation, peaceful sleep, etc...do you see anyone criminalise Human Breast Milk...apart from some idiot declaring that the very odd ice-cream made from human breast milk is not for human consumption?
& BTW don't believe a word i say...look it up first...speculate...question every single part of what could be questioned about whatever you research...if it's the truth you want...believing is fine...knowing is better though...& this has nothing to do with how learned you are or what is assumed you should know due to your specialist skills etc, it just has to do with what you have been exposed to or sheltered from systematically or not...
stephen mifsud
Aug 29th 2012, 15:32
i dont think so as i know many pot users in adolesence who went on to great carrers and still till today use cannabis for recreational use ... I do agree that Cannabis is not for everyone and it should be available to users who find it helpful to them ...
Manuel Mangani
Aug 29th 2012, 11:59
Are those who advocate the greater accessibility of cannabis through legalisation long-term users of the substance?
Jayelle Farmer
Aug 29th 2012, 10:41
Around the world, governments are neglecting their responsibility towards young people by their refusal to regulate cannabis in a proper manner.
Teenagers are currently able to easily buy cannabis from street dealers who do not ask for ID, only money.
This situation of governments continuing to allow easy access of all drugs to street dealers is totally unacceptable. If governments would regulate the sale and use of cannabis, then our young people would be protected from moral-free drug dealers.
Take the USA, where alcohol sales are prohibited to under 21's. Many American teenagers are into sport. They know that they cannot legally access alcohol and so they turn their attention towards sporting activities - proof that a licensing system of the drug alcohol most definitely works.
If people over the age of 18 were legally able to purchase cannabis, and if the government developed a regulated structure for its consumption - along the lines of cannabis cafés in Holland - then the link between cannabis and hard drugs would be permanently broken. The image of the young, lonely, methadone addict would then be a thing of the past.
It's way past time to end this diabolical state of affairs concerning our teenage youth - it's time for the world's governments to regulate the cannabis market for adults over the age of 18.
Please choose the reason of your report below: