Opportunities in education
It always comes as a surprise to non-Maltese when they find out that our economy is performing much better than those in other southern European economies, and, in particular, that unemployment is so low.
In June this year the National Statistics Office published data on key indicators of the Maltese labour market, based on the Labour Force Survey that has been run since 2004. The data is indeed impressive.
Between 2004 and 2011 the percentage of persons aged 15 to 64 who are in employment went up from 54.5 to 57.6 per cent. During the same period, the unemployment rate fell from 7.2 to 6.5 per cent.
The youth unemployment rate (among 15- to 24-year-olds) fell from 16.6 to 13.7 per cent. To understand the significance of this figure, one needs to remember that the youth unemployment rate in the EU is 22.7 per cent. Again the question that arises is why such a low figure.
Maybe the answer is given by two other pieces of data.
The percentage of early school leavers (that is, students who drop out of education at the end of secondary education) fell from 42.3 to 33.5 per cent during these seven years.
It used to be at around 60 per cent in the early 1990s. Thus, more young people are moving to further education and tertiary education.
The second piece of data is that the number of persons who have attained tertiary education has risen from 17.8 to 21.2 per cent.
This means that not only are students staying longer in education but they are also achieving better qualifications.
I believe this should explain why our labour market has remained buoyant and in some areas is still experiencing shortages.
The higher the educational attainment of the individual, the more opportunities that individual has to find employment.
More educational opportunities mean more employment opportunities. But even this tells us only part of the story.
There is another element that needs to be looked at. It is the variety and diversity of the further education programmes on offer.
If we simply increased the number of persons going to university, that would not have been enough.
We would have just increased the number of lawyers, doctors, accountants, engineers, architects and teachers.
There would not have been enough jobs for them while a number of vacancies in the manufacturing, tourism and services sectors would have remained unfilled.
I believe that our successful employment story is more due to the developments in vocational education than the developments in university education.
My direct experience is that it is very difficult to find a person who has graduated from the Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology or from the Institute of Tourism Studies and who is underemployed.
This is because of the practical work experience that such programmes provide. In fact, the various apprenticeship schemes, in their various shapes and forms, that we have had over the last decades have been an important source of supply to all large companies in Malta.
In practical terms, it would have been difficult to have a Playmobil or a Lufthansa Technik or an STMicroelectronics or any other significant employer in Malta, were it not for these apprenticeship schemes.
I believe that these apprenticeship schemes do require improvements (what does not?).
They may also need to be expanded to offer additional areas, taking into account the developments that we are expecting for our economy.
For example, one of the areas that we shall be placing emphasis on is advanced manufacturing.
Most of our larger manufacturing companies fall into this category already but we need to understand what this really means in terms of skills provision.
Similarly we need to understand more what the requirements for the IT sector are and provide accordingly.
It may be easy to fall into the trap of claiming that the investment we have had in Malta is a result of the incentives that are attached to such investment. This may be true to a certain extent.
However, such incentives would have had little effect had businesses not found a suitably-qualified labour force at the craft, technician and graduate level.
This is why we cannot afford to reduce the current extent of opportunities that our young people have for further education.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Jonathan Camilleri
Aug 25th 2012, 11:10
Education opportunities can be motivated with equitable rewards for professionals who invest their time and resources in educating themselves.
The business and governmental framework should work closer with education providers, and, both should continue to understand market, skill, performance, and, other human resources factors such as rewards, performance management and motivation.
Although Breivik does not seem to think so, globalization is a phenomenon which is expected to bring human beings closer to one another, and this includes global trade and cross-border employment and other forms of engagement.
J. Sciberras
Aug 24th 2012, 11:58
I agree with the view that investment in further and higher education, has and continues to contribute to increased participation rates in further and higher education, has contributed to attracting a certain kind of investment in Malta and also contributed to keep lower levels of youth unemployment.
But the correlation between participation rates and youth unemployment is not that straightforward.
Almost all countries in the EU have higher participation rates than those of Malta in further and higher education. For early school-leavers Malta remains at the bottom of the pile notwithstanding the progress made so far. Some countries have better youth employment rates others are much worse off than Malta. Why? Is the causal relationship exclusive to the education factor? or are there also some other important ingredients in the value chain that can turn this investment either into gold or coal?
Without much analysis to back up my reflection, I think Malta could still be attracting some industries that need and indeed find low skill/low cost labour which in part explains the outcome. I do not advocate this to be part of any strategy but the illusion of being more successful than others in terms of youth unemployment and improved education participation rates, might lead some to rest on their laurels.
It is also important to take lessons from those who have much higher rates of participation and yet they still suffer high youth unemployment rates - and most observations on this phenomenon include the lack of co-ordinated skills forecasting and counselling, structural skills mismatches, a bias towards demand in service oriented careers matched with unrealistic remuneration expectations and high labour costs... to mention but a few.
Malta needs to prepare itself better for these possible scenarios too. More research needs to be carried out in a holistic way between the education institutions, the investor/business community, and policy makers to be agile and responsive in the face of emerging global opportunity.
A major challenge for education is that at the age of 11-13 within the current education system the path of a persons career opportunities is already determined, and its very hard to shift and change easily as you climb the ladder of higher levels of education and training. Being responsive means giving more general skills earlier in education and a wider array of learning pathways (if not multiple) later on in life.
Malta is renowned for being nimble, and resilient. With aan extra dose of ambition and insight into global opportunities, I am confident that people, education institutions and perhaps policy makers, will find interesting solutions to these challenges.
Please choose the reason of your report below: