Advert

‘Secretive, ruthless... unpredictable tyrant’

World media’s take on the death of Dom Mintoff

The New York Times described Dom Mintoff as “secretive, unpredictable and, to enemies, a ruthless tyrant. But to admirers, he was the father of modern Malta.”

“In an often-conquered land... Mr Mintoff fiercely sought an end to Malta’s exploitation by foreign powers, a revival of national dignity and economic and diplomatic ties with nations that could underwrite Maltese neutrality,” according to the 1,200-word article in The New York Times.

The former Prime Minister’s death elicited wide coverage in the world media, with many recalling his unpredictable nature of negotiating, especially on the international stage.

The New York Times article highlighted how his efforts to “play foreign rivals against one another” would often work, but his domestic politics were “fair game for critics, who charged that he corrupted democracy by using patronage, gerrymandering, legislation of doubtful constitutionality, even goon squads at the polls and physical bullying”.

By the time he resigned as Prime Minister in 1984, Mr Mintoff had “set his nation on a road to self-sufficiency with a welfare state, socialised medicine, diversified industries and most of its trade and tourism coming from the West,” The New York Times concluded.

The BBC called Mr Mintoff: “a skilful and confident administrator and a tough negotiator; short in physical stature and fond of pipe-smoking and horse-riding, but with an enormous capacity for hard work.”

The 1976 election that returned Mr Mintoff to power for a third term “brought a considerable increase in political violence”, the BBC wrote.

Nationalist clubs were “attacked and wrecked by faceless men who seemed to be above the law”.

For the Financial Times, Mr Mintoff was “one of those nationalist leaders whom the British media loved to hate, in the generation which saw the end of the British empire”.

He had traits in common with Mohammed Mossadeq of Iran, Archbishop Makarios of Cyprus and Gamal Abdul Nasser of Egypt, “but perhaps more resembled those Commonwealth leaders who, like him, had been to Britain for higher education, married British wives, and came away with a deeply ambivalent attitude to the ‘mother country’”.

Mr Mintoff’s talents as a politician and administrator, and even his personal charm, were widely acknowledged, the Financial Times wrote.

But he “will be remembered mainly as the leader of a very small country who too often felt obliged to assert himself by rude and quarrelsome behaviour. This made him many enemies.”

The London Evening Standard, meanwhile, wrote that Mr Mintoff’s daughter Yana, who is expected to be a candidate for the Labour Party at the next Maltese election, was “as active and confrontational a politician as her father”, recalling her incident in the House of Commons in 1978.

Advert

51 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Alex Buds

Aug 23rd 2012, 00:53

"No maltese, past and future will ever attract such attention and respect."

...little bit of a broad sweeping stroke of pessimism there...

Eric Soames

Aug 22nd 2012, 21:17

' ... I wonder if he New York times reports the atrocities carried out by American troops ...': You obviously don't know the New York Times!

Reuben Micallef

Aug 22nd 2012, 14:01

Lord Carrington sent back on the same plane ... cool :) never had heard of that ... Anyways I am a non voter but it's not rocket science to realise that nobody is perfect and that you cannot please everybody ... one thing is for sure though, we gained our independence thanks to this individual along many other good things ... so let's not point fingers ...

GL Calleja

Aug 22nd 2012, 15:22

Joseph, I think you are mixing apples with tomatoes. One has nothing to do with the other.

Emanuel Curmi

Aug 22nd 2012, 11:39

Actually I find that there is more than just a hint of grudging admiration in such a summation. After all, most of the world dictators were actually nurtured by the USA and most turned out to be monsters and yet the USA cannot claim to have ever influenced Mintoff in anyway, who while being ruthless with his opponents, he was first and foremost the reformer who paved the way for democracy and well being for tiny Malta. As far as being the mother of democracies, the USA has always been a legend in its own mind and are, themselves, immensely shocked when other nations accuse them as being biased in their foreign policies. I would take such comments with a pinch of salt as the Americans have always adored strong leaders and they do not come any stronger than Dom Mintoff.

John Azzopoardi

Aug 22nd 2012, 12:31

Mr Brincat, what the NY Times write is her business. THere isn't anything that was not true except that some considered the father of Modern Malta. ONly MLP supporters use to consider mintoff as father of Malta. Many of us didn't.. Regardless of what you may think, YES, the US is the major democracy in the world and although its interest are always in the forefront, it does keep democracies thriving in the world. THe democratic method has been in place for over hundred of years, but it is with it zeal that the US has a huge impact on democracies thriving world wild. I don't think it's little Malta that is having an impact on democracy worldwide. So keep your anti US semitism out of your thinking.

Charles Grixti

Aug 22nd 2012, 15:38

There is no democracy in the US or anywhere for that matter. What there is is a two-headed one party system (the party of the top 1%) who get a chance to switch roles every 4/5 years. And bringing "Democracy' or safeguarding it around the world is a euphemism for the excuse to invade countries and destablised them so that multi-national corporations can get access to cheap resources. In fact, many 'democratic' countries are amongst the world's poorest nations.

binni roberts

Aug 22nd 2012, 18:17

i,m not maltese,.,.,.however i admired mintoff for what he did for malta .,.,.,not wanting foreign influence for example removing the brits ,.,..,was he not married to one and adopted the british welfare /health system ?.,.,

Charles Grixti

Aug 22nd 2012, 14:58

Yes I agree, it is the pot calling the kettle black. And the fact that he introduced the welfare state, neutrality and socialised medicine cannot have endeared him to them either.

Richard Caruana

Aug 22nd 2012, 11:42

What infrastructure?

Strouger telephone systems everyone had scrapped? With which you could hear seven conversations at once?

A coal-firing power station that turned Marsa into a dump?

Water in the taps once a week?

Industrial revolution: The Chinese factories none of which lasted more than a couple of years? Cheap labour? Ban on IT?

Please, be serious.

Reinhard Azzopardi

Aug 22nd 2012, 14:51

@Richard Caruana,

The "listening to 7 conversations at once" was hilarious. I miss them :)

V Vella

Aug 22nd 2012, 12:25

xidja bil-Malti.

Hossam Helwani

Aug 22nd 2012, 10:31

@ anthony arpa

li tasal tqabbel lill mintoff ma Gesu nahseb li qed tohlom wahda sew. Gesu kien bniedem li jisma u jaghder. Mintoff kien terribli u jew hu biss jew hadd . Min waqaflu kien juza il forza tal marmalja. Dan Gesu Qatt ma ghamlu. Gesu qatt ma ha kumpens ta lm360 000 fuq id dar ta dellimara!

Ara vera il partigjanizzmu ghama dan il pajjiz.

Joseph Pavia

Aug 22nd 2012, 11:24

sur Helwani
Li m'ghamilx Kristu ghamluh is-segwagi tieghu u Mintoff u familtu tghidx kemm batew minhabba fihom dawn in-nies twajba. Jekk ma tafx l-istejjaer titkellimx qabel tkun tafhom. Veru illum ma ghadhomx jaharquk haj imma fiz- zmien li nibet Mintoff kienu saru esperti kif jaharqulek l-ispirtu tieghek... u kif. Haga ohra, hemm miktub biex is-segwagi ta' Kristu, illum il- Kattolici, suppost jimitawh lil Kristu. Voldieri ma jkun jaghmel xejn hazin li wiehed iqabblek ma Kristu jekk tkun ghamilt il-gid.
U hallik mill partigjanizmu ghami specjalment jekk tkun partigjan ghami int ukoll!

Norman E Grech

Aug 22nd 2012, 11:25

@ Helwani!

Ara vera il partigjanizzmu ghama dan il pajjiez. Ikkonfermajtu dan kif qrat xi ktibt int!!!

John Zammit

Aug 22nd 2012, 13:48

@ Hossam Helwani Speaking about Mintoff for you seems to be like an outcast Remember that even Jesus got feed up and angry with what was being done outside the temple and he used violence to kicked them away

Anthony Scicluna

Aug 22nd 2012, 10:59

Haa haa haa! Good one

Joseph Pavia

Aug 22nd 2012, 11:32

@ Mr. Lock , when in darkness you would need light. Do you agree, Mr. Scicluna?

Christian Sciberras

Aug 22nd 2012, 10:29

Could you explain to me how stifling progress by outlawing technology makes one a "visionary"??

"Father of Modern Malta" - a well deserved title, considering Malta today is just as bad as it has ever been. Thanks to this "man of action", by the way.

pat muscat

Aug 22nd 2012, 11:16

@Christian Sciberras: Mintoff brought the most modern electronic components factory ever in Malta: SGS,...... and it is spewing 50%+ of Malta's export after 25 years.
Where is the Nationalist equivalent of this factory ?
There is none, zero!
Your idea of a technologically savvy government (PN) must be very clouded given that after 25 years we are still enduring black outs, with a power station at Delimara that is already obsolete and, like every PN project not a single cent has been paid out of its bill!

Mr Kevin Zammit

Aug 22nd 2012, 13:53

@Christian

How did Mintoff exactly "outlaw" Technology?

The perit at the time took over the leadership of a country that he himself his plan A was to integrate with the UK. The church and GBO spoilt that .. Plan B was nothing short of a miracle. The balancing of a budget for an island nation that had nothing ... no industry no tourism ... nothing.

The only way that could be achieved was by a controlled command economy no more no less and whoever says any different just has to see the bad state our public accounts are in ... not to mention Greece, Ireland and Cyprus!!!!

Charles Grixti

Aug 22nd 2012, 15:08

@Christian Sciberras

It is true he did outlaw technology and all other things that had to be imported and great costs from outside - perhaps he understood the financial system and how it is used to indebt nations. He kept a very careful eye on the deficit and the Central Bank was totally under Malta's control. I guess recent events in the world of economics and finance proved how right he was.

Malta could have done very well for itself both in economic and environmental departments had it been blessed with prudent leaders who had a vision for Malta that did not include going back to grovelling at the feet of some super-State or power.

Stephen Lock

Aug 22nd 2012, 10:28

The UK left of their own accord, look at Cyprus !!! Had the UK wanted to stay it would have at all costs and Mintoff would have not stopped them. The fact was Mintoff was in power at the time when the British ended the Med fleet and that of the Far East as it no longer sought a Naval Presence in these area due to the Nuclear Sea Deterrent. The far east was picked up by the Australian and New Zealand Royal Navy and the Med was deemed non strategic any more. Why all the political proprganda, why can't we all just say RIP

Charles Micallef

Aug 22nd 2012, 12:33

Stephen Lock

I am not sure where you were at the time? but some of us live through those years and the recollection of events differ totally from yours, If NATO and UK did not need Malta as a base why did Mintoff had to take them on to raise the money paid for occupying the best sites in Malta from the peanuts of 2Million to over 13Million, this was in 1970's when the difference of 11million would have made a very big difference to Malta's economy. If they did pay what was due then Mintoff would not have been labelled as a Tyrant by the NYT....! and would have called "a nice man"........ Mintoff fought for Malta and the Maltese and won!

Joseph John Camilleri

Aug 22nd 2012, 14:59

The father of modern Mlata. You must be joking. Bil-hniena television tal-kulur u kollox tas-second hand ibda' mis-sistema tat-telephone.

Lawrence Zammit

Aug 22nd 2012, 09:51

Foreign media see mintoff in his true perspective. We judge him according to our political believes- Saviour by one side, arrogant and an instigator of violence by the other side. After all a coin has two faces. You select the side you want to see.

Advert
Advert