We are all Christopher Habers
By now the photograph on the front page of The Times that shocked so many people will probably be a niggling distant memory. The shock was misinterpreted as being caused by the paltriness of the fine meted out to these fine gents who would have been described by my grandmother in no uncertain terms as descendants of Jupiter, which is the height of sarcasm in case any of you didn’t notice.
When faced with a tribe of defiant ill-clad men sitting on the steps of the law courts beaming because Christopher Haber, who had been beaten up, “forgave” them because, obviously, the last thing he wanted was further trouble, one should not have expected the fine to be worse than it was.
It is within the limits laid down in the rule book. However, were I the presiding magistrate, I would perhaps have given these toe- and nose-picking, tongue-flashing scions of the Maltese noblesse a tongue lashing of the most memorable kind.
Instead, post-judgment, we, the honest, taxpaying, decent citizens in Malta are faced with this sort of arrogant defiance; defiance to decency, defiance to the law, which, in my book, is an intolerable situation.
The uproar was immediate and very flammable and hit The Times online and the social media like a plague of locusts.
Maybe it’s the heat. This year has been extremely and protractedly hot. Those who have an AC and who work in an AC, are mostly immune from the blasts of molten smelly air for most of the day and are unhappy enough when leaving their fresh havens to get to another one.
Imagine those people who depend solely on the slight sea breezes that waft into Marsaxlokk harbour to cool them down in their tents, which, apparently, year after year, obliterate the bay at this time of the year without a so much by your leave.
This is happening everywhere and in all spheres.
People are driving badly and uncouthly. There is no courtesy on the road or anywhere else unless its part and parcel of the service like in the big companies and institutions.
Even on Facebook I noticed a decrease in the level of politeness and lo and behold, even here we have started, as in an old Malta Times expression, hurling invective at one another like the clash of the Titans.
It is indeed difficult to know what to do when faced with a situation like this. That people are extremely upset is a fact. They feel vulnerable and unprotected just like poor Mr Haber who had to willy-nilly turn the other cheek, not from any Christian sentiment mind you, but because he values his bacon and his family’s and knows full well that, should he opt for any heroics, nobody is going to stick up for him or defend him because in Malta we are used to keeping our heads below the parapet. That is why the tailors’ dummies like those charged are so cocksure of themselves and couldn’t give a flying whatsit about the law.
What did emerge from the incident was that this was no isolated case and Malta and his wife got to know about the infamous incident because the same intrepid photographer was there, twice over, at the right time and in the right place to capture it and its aftermath in flagrante.
Yes, I do feel that in many instances the haste to improve social justice and enfranchise the people has had the effect of throwing out the baby with the bathwater as, despite the dramatic increase in academic education, this has not produced commensurate “educated” people in the Maltese sense, in other words; polite and well-spoken individuals with whom it is a pleasure to meet.
At this juncture, people wondered whether any of those people or institutions whom and which we look up to – the government, Parliament, the law courts, the political parties, or even the Church – would make some official statement. That is impossible.
The government is powerless as it constitutionally cannot interfere with the workings of the law courts as that would jeopardise the latter’s independence. The same goes for Parliament.
The law courts, as epitomised by the Chief Justice, are not in the habit of explaining anything despite the rubbish we are fed on programmes like Judge Deed; it’s all balderdash apparently.
The Church is far too busy to set an example as to how one is to behave as it’s got enough on its plate with morning band marches getting totally out of hand and resembling the bacchanalias of Sodom and Gomorrah, all this to celebrate what is ostensibly a religious and devotional celebration with fireworks and bands.
Adding to its moral dilemma about IVF and other issues, being kind and polite and, above all, considerate, to one’s neighbour is hardly part of the equation.
As for the political parties, even discussing them in this context is silly. That leaves the police, which have declared that they would appeal but on what grounds if poor Mr Haber does not press charges?
The upshot is that, despite the nationwide outcry last week that justice has gone to the dogs, there is little anyone can do to remedy the situation. The politicos have to epater le canaille because their vote is as valid as any University professor’s or business entrepreneur’s and far more easily bought or sold.
Thus, true democracy is already being mocked and I wonder whether you have debated, deep in your heart as, God forbid, anyone had to hear you, whether universal suffrage was a good idea after all.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Jean-Pierre Aquilina
Aug 23rd 2012, 12:34
"The government is powerless as it constitutionally cannot interfere with the workings of the law courts as that would jeopardise the latter’s independence. The same goes for Parliament."
No, the Government and Parliament are not powerless. They can propose and pass bills to improve the laws so as to protect victims of such crimes, and to deter such crimes from happening in the first place.
carlos ellul
Aug 23rd 2012, 09:57
These things happen all the time. For example, the one way to report a neighbour who allows his dog to bark day and night, is to give your person details to the authorities. Such thing can lead to exposure and bullying.
It seems that our authorities are only concerned of having positive statistics rather then actually sort things up.
GL Calleja
Aug 21st 2012, 15:11
And this too shall pass. So KZT until next year, when these Tent Bullies will take over some other public beach.
Charles Grima
Aug 21st 2012, 11:51
Hardly surprising, this lack of courtesy... This morning, while walking to work, I had to step down from the pavement because of dog excrement... this Mercedes van (CBJ XXX) dropping workers, pulls suddenly to the kerb, and as I jump to the side in alarm, I ask him why he didn't use an indicator... (Oh so politely, and naturally not a care for the cars behind him who 'honked' their horn in anger....)
At which point he swears, and tells me to go back on the pavement, ''if you know what's best for you.'' he concludes.
Now if I wanted to, I could have dragged the little squirt from the van and pounded him into the ground, but listening to my conscience, thought it would be best to just keep going and keep my mouth shut....until the next time.
And this is why I absolutely hate mini-bus drivers.
Eric Soames
Aug 21st 2012, 11:19
Pity there wasn't some way that Mr Haber could have been offered [real] protection and maybe a 'safe house' on a temporary basis. In the long term some general good would have come out of these thugs getting their just deserts in court.
Victor Zammit
Aug 21st 2012, 11:14
KZT writes “It is within the limits laid down in the rule book.” In a way this echoes the “legal niceties” bit in this paper’s editorial of 15.8.2012
But is it within the limits of the book of law? Where is the pound of flesh?
Consider that it is against the law to detain any person, to utter insults and threats. Nor can three or more persons assemble in circumstances of violence, threats, tumults, numbers or display of arms or otherwise as are calculated to create terror and alarm. For such offences the punishment is from one month to two years or a fine (Art. 79, 86, 339 Criminal Code).
Besides, if a bodily harm caused by an offender’s imprudence, carelessness, unskilfulness in art or profession or non-observance of regulations is slight, proceedings may only be taken on the complaint of the injured party (Art. 226 CC).
Now we are told that Mr Haber "forgave". In terms of law, not morality, that must mean he did not complain as an injured party. But he did not need to, or if he did ("forgave") that would have been irrelevant because the acts against him were not connected with Art. 226.
Intriguing. But the matter is still pending and we will be the wiser (no, wise) then, hopefully. Otherwise, unfortunately, if you want justice go elsewhere, as KZT subliminally infers.
Emanuel Muscat
Aug 21st 2012, 10:59
Old people live in the past and in the future of their children and their grandchilden.
Young people live in the present which is now bleak so they feel confused and betrayed:the old people feel betrayed as well.
So you have a recipe for disaster, with all this gloom and doom:this is why some young people resort to drugs and the old people to 'medicines'.
There is no quick solution now:our future is conflict again.
So forget about universal suffrage: that is already 'history' for the west .
J Degabriele
Aug 21st 2012, 10:09
Well said, sir! My very own feelings expressed!
Please choose the reason of your report below: