Advert

A tribe that’s losing its head

So, what’s going wrong? Why is Malta sinking according to so many objective standards? Yesterday, mediocrity was the main burr in the saddle, edging out those elements that did the island proud.

Today mediocrity seems to be the least of it. Why, for instance, is there a culture of violence developing?

There have always been a minority of violent people and incidents of violence. But never as on the present scale.

Paceville gives abundant examples. People who go there, presumably to relax and be entertained, frequently end up in fights, leading even to deaths.

Those who are hired to iron out such incidents within haunts of so-called entertainment all too often end up using much more force than might be necessary to quell such incidents.

Do bouncers have training to do their job, which requires much more than brawn?

Do they have a code of behaviour and ethics?

Put simply, are they in any way taught that strong-arm tactics should only be used in the final analysis to counter – not to start or increase – violence?

What of the police charged with monitoring the area? They are hard pressed in numbers, no doubt about that.

Should they be increased, particularly in plain clothes, lest we give the impression that ours is a police-ridden state? Are they given special training? Do they, in turn, have a code of ethics?

Why are the police armed with weapons that shoot to kill, as happened to an immigrant wielding a knife but surrounded by several policemen?

Are armed police given strict instructions when it is permitted to fire their weapons, which should be more of a deterrent than a threat? Are they instructed to shoot, when ultimately and essentially necessary, to disable rather than to kill? Are they given the right circumstances to do their onerous jobs?

Why is violence spreading to town and village, even to such stupid bullying extremes as captured on tape near Marsaxlokk a few days ago?

To get back to Paceville and other areas where youths congregate, why has the age of such youths fallen so dramatically as to include 13- and 14-year-old girls dressed to invite dangerous but welcome attention?

Why are drugs distributed so liberally there?

A youngish Maltese couple who now live abroad told me during one of their visits that they were aghast at the freedom and visibility whereby drugs are traded in Paceville.

It is in the nature of humanity to experiment, even with the devil. But when did experiment become matter-of-fact usage, the couple asked. Cannot the police take still stricter action?

Why are such a high percentage of newly married couples breaking up not long after having taken their vows? Is it because the traditional basis of marriage – love and mutual respect – has dissipated?

Is it because couples marry for materialistic reasons – to escape from parental control, to jointly finance an abode? Such break-ups have nothing to do with the new divorce legislation.

They have become a trend in recent years. Why? Is whatever can be done about it being done, like sensitive education and guidance to youths early on, to prepare them for what they will face and also be tempted by?

Why has the concept of God, of a supreme being if one does not want to be tied by a specific faith, become almost redundant? Why is church attendance in freefall? Why are even non-religious values being so devalued?

There are so many other questions to ask. They all amount to a strong impression that we are close to becoming a tribe that lost its head.

The most fearful aspect of all is that these social issues do not form part of our political discussion, which is rooted in one basic objective: retaining or gaining naked power.

Why are the leaders of our tribe so nonchalant about it all?

Do they not recognise the abyss we are falling into?

Advert

16 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Peter Simpson

Aug 20th 2012, 16:43

@ Mr Peter Vella
Its a pity you did not travel in the 60s; you would have seen that foreigners had a pension whilst we had none; you would have seen that the Europeans had a welfare State whilst we had none; you would had seen that foreigners had decent housing whilst we had none: you have also noticed that most of the people worked in factories whilst in Malta most of the people worked in the military services; or simply emigrated in their thousands; you have noticed that foreigners had their own currency whist we had the sterling; you would have seen that foreign countries controlled their air space, their harbours , their Marsa Sport grounds, ta Qali, and Kalafrana air/sea fields, whilst we did not control these: the British did.
You would have noticed that there were no free elections because anyone who voted Labour had mortal sin imposed on him, and you know what: your beloved PN without shame, governed twice in 1962 and 1966 against the basic tenants of basic human rights: free elections!

Eddy Privitera

Aug 20th 2012, 17:05

Peter Vella. Don't ask Lino Spiteri about poverty and homeless people, just ask Mons. Victor Grech of Caritas.
When Lino Spiteri militated in the MLP of the time you refer to, the labour government created the WELFARE STATE which drastically reduced poverty which was rampant under former PN governments. That welfare state from which you and your family have been benefitting from since those years !

Gianninu Saliba

Aug 20th 2012, 20:59

Mr. Simpson, how things and history changes according to the Malta Labour Party. You people blame the Nationalist Party for the mortal sin imposed on those voting Labour, but the PN, as you know, had nothing to do with it. It was, first of all, Labour that had a problem with the Church's teachings and it was the Church and not the PN that imposed mortal sin. Then, you Socialists, compare Malta's 1960s to the rest of Europe, but forget that Malta became independent in the mid sixties. We had a mountain to climb, we had to erase the mentality of Malta becoming a small county of the United Kingdom. We had to build Malta's first hotels (apart of the Hotel Phoenicia), the first factories, a new University to accommodate more students and all the basics required to kick start the economy. But then, your beloved Mintoff referred to western Europe as Cain's Europe. But things like that you Minfoffians prefer to forget. Just as much as you want us to forget that we had no water or electricity for three if not four days a week, but we had thugs roaming the streets causing havoc. We had no free speech, but we had a dictatorship. We had job opportunities, but we had massive unemployment. Yes, I am talking about the 70s and 80s. No wonder that you and your Party does not want to talk about the past. Your bright, intelligent, competent and efficient (I am being sarcastic) new leader wants us to talk about the future... and yet he has no plans about the future. He wants to make us believe that he is tailor-made as a Prime Minister and that he is an economist. Your Joseph does not even realize that the world has been going through a crisis since 2008, or a least he does not admit it in public. He also does not know what being a Prime Minister entails, and that's why he will never be able to occupy such an important position. As far as Lino Spiteri is concerned he knows first hand that what I have just stated is the truth and Malta's darkest days were when he was a Labour Minister. God, we pray you, save us from going back to hell.

Peter Simpson

Aug 21st 2012, 16:48

@Gianninu Saliba. Funny how only fanatics like you call Mintoff a dictator; the New York Times did not call him so, neither did the BBC or La Republica. The fact that the PN did not take Mintoff to court in th 80s-freedom is based on the rule of law- says it all.
Only blue eyed boys, who see nothing but blue, distort and paint history in only one colour : blue, your only primary colour!
Luckily, the New York Times, and the BBC-hardly a socialist newspaper and corporation-can give a very objective and unbiased picture of Mintoff the founding father of the Maltese nation!

Victor Rodenas

Aug 20th 2012, 14:27

You are right,...but many times it is a false I.D.

Patrick Zammit

Aug 20th 2012, 15:26

The most important thing for our politicians is prohibiting Paceville goers from buying cheap(er) booze from places which are neither clubs nor bars.

Advert
Advert