Advert

Caravan park plan is thrown out

The campsite was proposed for the Ta’ Jelli area in Naxxar. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

The campsite was proposed for the Ta’ Jelli area in Naxxar. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

The Environment Planning Tribunal has dismissed an appeal to build a 1,000 square metre caravan park in a development zone in Naxxar.

Situated in Ta’ Jelli area in Naxxar, close to Magħtab, the site had been slapped with an enforcement notice in 2001 because it had already started operating illegally as a caravan park.

The developer turned to the tribunal after the planning authority threw out an application to build the park because it did not fall in line with the area’s policies. The site falls within an area of agricultural value and is classified as a rural settlement.

Converting the site into a caravan park “will lead to the degradation of the agricultural value” of the site and “further unnecessary take-up of fresh land for development”, the planning authority had said.

The applicant argued that the Magħtab area, which was close to the landfill, was committed to various industrial and agricultural developments and there were no other places to park the caravans.

The controversial issue of caravan parks came under the media spotlight during the past week when campers at Marsaxlokk bay were evicted after five men assaulted a man protesting against the campsite.

According to planning policies, acceptable land uses for the Magħtab area are farmhouses for livestock use, agricultural buildings and retail outlets for farms.

The planning authority had said: “The proposed caravan park constitutes a land use which is non-compliant with the permitted uses in the rural settlement.” It added that it was “an unjustified urban type of development” at the expense of other agricultural uses.

The tribunal also noted that a number of planning applications had been refused on grounds of loss of agricultural land. However, illegal development still took place.

It also threw out the applicant’s argument that there were no other areas to park caravans. While admitting there were a number of uses that did not fall in line with the area’s policies, the tribunal said these had taken place before the local plans were established.

“The aim of the local plan is to stop these uses to allow the place, over time, to regain its rural character,” the tribunal said.

Advert

33 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Pippo De Marco

Aug 20th 2012, 11:57

Or maybe a well-connected developer could build an ugly, multi-story, high-rise caravan park in a beautiful seaside location. - It could have a large spiral caravan lift on the outside that doubles as a 'London Eye' type viewing vehicle, a fast food court at ground level and an all-weather recreation park on the roof with water slides and bungee ropes dropping into the sea. Oh, and a nightclub / 24hr casino.

Couldn't happen ? - Well once upon a time I would have said, 'Absolutely not'. However, having seen what some developers and even Prime Ministers have got away with building in recent years, I wouldn't rule anything out.

J Micallef

Aug 20th 2012, 10:28

Well said.

But MEPA rarely finds objection for permanent development of other sites...it all depends on who is making the pplication, it seems.

G Zammit

Aug 20th 2012, 08:15

Its not closed

Edward Curmi

Aug 20th 2012, 09:54

In Malta the difference is that we want everything for FREE!!!

C Cassar

Aug 19th 2012, 20:21

The surface layers aren't toxic so agricultural use is fine. Deeper down, the soil still contains toxic substances. Water leaches these out and into the sea. That's why bathing is banned. However, plenty of local Maltese ignore the very important notices and by doing so are putting themselves and their children and long term health risk. Now that's the issue, the term 'long term' which the Maltese simply don't understand. It's a big sign of lack of education.

Lawrence Fenech

Aug 19th 2012, 20:53

C Borg.

You are right, it's a beautiful small sandy beach in a beautiful area, the authorities concerned should make this area available to bathers and have it cleaned up and certified good for bathing.

clive borg

Aug 19th 2012, 23:01

@ Lawrence Fenech - if its unfit for swimming how it should be certified good for bathing! Unless tests doesn't show its unfit, it should remain so....

C Cassar

Aug 20th 2012, 07:20

It can't be just 'cleaned up' because toxins are leaching from deep inside the Maghtab area. Unfotunately this will take many more years to improve. At the end of the day, the Maltese people are reaping what they sowed many years ago. It's got nothing to do with any government but simply the greed and short ter view of ordinaty Maltese citizens.

Joe Vella

Aug 19th 2012, 19:04

Ye, for sure, close to a landfill.

G G Debono

Aug 19th 2012, 19:55

re "does not look like an agricultural site."

Maybe it was an agricultural site once and can be restored.....

Charles Muscat

Aug 19th 2012, 13:37

You got it wrong. Where did you get the idea that caravans are designed for short or long distances?
Caravans are clean and hygienic more than the boat house that are illegally build around the Island. The government should allow more space for caravan parks around the Island and get rid of the boat houses altogether.

Mr R.E. Saliba

Aug 19th 2012, 15:13

@C Cassar
What is it to you???
Let them caravan and camp if they feel like.
Way better entertainment for kids than sitting at home playing pc games.

Anyhow it makes more sense to give land for this project than to build massive blocks of tiny apartments that no one needs.

Franco Farrugia

Aug 19th 2012, 18:56

I think that both of you have valid points. Mr Cassar rightly points out that the islands are far too small and limited to expect caravan owners to have ample room where to practice caravanning.

Mr Muscat is also correct - after all, we have plenty of space 'dedicated', even if illegally, to permanent boat-houses-of-sorts. Admittedly, caravans are more congruous than the boat-houses we see around and caravans are specifically built for the purpose.

We should do away altogether with these boat-houses - remove them in toto - and dedicate one or two of the patches previously used for them for caravanning - orderly, legal, with all amenities.

Brian Portelli

Aug 19th 2012, 20:21

You are right C Cassar. Mr Saliba, take your kids out to play instead of playing games at home and afterwards go back home after a 15 minute drive. No need for a caravan

Ben Agius

Aug 20th 2012, 01:48

If there is to be a caravan park or two on Malta, then proper Govt permits should be obtained and proper facilities built with provision of services etc which the users have to pay for. Then it's a small business. the issue is that these people want to squat somewhere for free - perhaps!

john chircop

Aug 20th 2012, 07:03

Spot on Mr.Cassar I have already made a comment on this issue.Its not like people cant go away for the day and return the next day!My god wow people might travel all the way from the south of the island to the north taking them how long a journey,3 hours,5 hours! I dont think so.Yet they think its a valid point to go with their caravans and park them where they want to.Again common sense dictates you cant do what ever you want,simple as that,just accept your surroundings its not hard!

Andrej Psaila

Aug 20th 2012, 08:48

Tents are useless as well? Are you saying that spending a weekend in the Mellieha area in a tent is the same as spending a weekend at home?

Advert
Advert