Advert

Kappara residents: chosen junction protects the valley

Kappara residents believe Transport Malta chose to go ahead with the most environmentally friendly option to solve the area’s long-running junction bottle-neck problems.

Building a bridge over the present Mikiel Anton Vassalli Street supported by pillars on the banks of the valley – in line with existing building and development footprint – addressed concerns on air quality and traffic management, they said.

Resident Ruben Overend stressed that the proposed bridge crossing what is known as Regional Road will mean losing only 20 square metres of land, considered as an area of ecological importance in Wied Għollieqa.

This, he said, contrasts with the 155 square metres impacted by the original proposal.

Moreover, the impact of the original proposal on an existing bird sanctuary in Wied Għollieqa would have been twice as bad as the second option.

The original proposal had suggested four slipways on either side of the current road as well as raising the whole road on pillars, which would cost some €4.5 million to expropriate between seven and 10 buildings on the Gżira side.

This would have included The Cottage restaurant as well as the relatively new block of flats behind it. It would also mean closing such an important thoroughfare for two years.

Mr Overend said residents were “pleasantly surprised” to hear Transport Malta favouring the second option, which was similar to proposals by an engineer they had appointed. The option will now be considered by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority.

He said residents were also pleased the decision was not taken to “shut us up” but on the basis of detailed technical studies that delved into the pros and cons of each option.

According to a technical report commissioned by Transport Malta, including a feasibility study, the second option was preferred because it would cut pollution levels through shorter driving distances, although the two would both cost around €24 million.

Mr Overend said the favoured proposal would not destroy the valley as the pillars would be placed on its banks and not protrude more than the existing building line.

Mr Overend, who sits on the Kappara Residents’ Association, admitted that the footprint of the chosen option is slightly larger than the original option but argued that experts said the flora earmarked for removal was not ecologically sensitive.

“Kappara residents would be plain stupid to propose a development that ruins the only source of oxygen in this extremely polluted hamlet. The results of the air quality studies have shown that we live in a highly polluted area,” he said.

Solving the problem of the bottleneck Kappara junction, the cause of much frustration for motorists, has been an objective since the early 1990s.

Once completed, the EU-funded project was expected to ease traffic on the four thoroughfares. Several attempts to solve the problem over the years have failed, including the much-criticised installation of traffic lights on the roundabout.

Advert

57 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Anthony Pace Gouder

Aug 19th 2012, 16:37

Anyone in his right sense of mind would have never considered or had the slightest thought of encroaching onto the small valley .

This is totally OUT OF PROPORTION , something that only a Minister with crude ideas and irrational advise would concieve !

After all ........ all this is being done because of THREE HOUSEHOLDS ! These residents have managed to postpone the construction of a proper simple fly-over for too long !.

Wouldn't it be wiser to relocate these residents and finally solve the problem while saving unnecessary expenditure ?

Chris Grillo

Aug 19th 2012, 09:49

Now Mr.Morrison, your surname sounds English, as mine resembles Italian, although I am Maltese... can you tell me who the hell goes to see the flora and fauna in such a wildly prohibitive valley such as that in Kappara, in that area? Name me a tourist guide trip!

I am all for greenery and preservation of our environment, but let me ask you this, is my fuel and time worth more than some grass that holds no particular interest? I would say yes! And that has to be said because that valley has been spoilt for ages now, and has ceased to be of any ecological interest!

I am sure that the Kappara residents have their heads firmly on their necks in selecting the least intrusive option to help ease their stress, because driving through Kappara is indeed a stress...

Sometimes, you JUST have to give in to progress... well, progress.... if thirty years ago, the 'proposed trains' were given the go ahead, we would have a better transport.. just don't leave it in the hands of foreigners who think they know it all.....they don't know crap about our island....



Mark Cassar

Aug 20th 2012, 05:35

Mr Grillo, you have no idea about the time, work and resources that has been invested into said valley by the relevant NGO (Nature Trust). If you did you would think again. What irks me is that the government does know and is still considering throwing all that away for a number of residents; numbering three households? Because they do not want people to look at their swimming pools? The audacity is beyond comprehension, and the government is giving them validity.

Peppi Micallef

Aug 19th 2012, 01:03

How can I help Mr.Buhagiar?

Michael Sciortino

Aug 18th 2012, 23:14

There is no need to pass through Mrabat. Those from Kappara or Msida going to Gzira can turn before or after the tunnel and rejoin Regional Road in the other direction towards Msida and turn into Sliema Road. the problem with this junction is the relatively few cars that need to cross into Kappara or Gzira which stop the much heavier Msida-Swieqi, Swieqi-Msida traffic.

I never knew why this traffic arragement was stopped. I remember the traffic police used to open and close iron gates in the roundabout to allow traffic to pass through the middle of the roundabout. I would rather see this kind of sulution before considering this expensive monstrosity.

Michael Sciortino

Aug 18th 2012, 23:43

There should not be any problems for those coming from the sta venera tunnels towards Gzira. Such traffic could keep going straight and exit before the tunnels and take the slip road back onto regional road. From Regional road they can exit via triq reggie miller into rue d'argens or keep going down and exit via Sliema Road. Mrabat street is another option but it is better avoided. If the road before the tunnels is busy cars have the option to turn around after the tunnels by using the slip road to the left, turn right under the bridge and turn right again onto regional road and the tunnel.

B. Storace

Aug 18th 2012, 17:32

I laud your comments sir and I would also like to know what precautions the contractor will take to protect the valley during the building phase(s) of the concrete supports. What about the cranes and other heavy machinery, which I'm sure will be utilised at some point, will they be placed in the valley and what about the conscientious worker known for carelessness igri u gerri?

Anthony Pace Gouder

Aug 18th 2012, 17:43

Only Three , at the most , HOUSEHOLDS border the existing roundabout ! Talking about 'Kappara Residents' makes one think its the ENTIRE LOCALITY's population .

This project has been held 'on hold', for too long , now running in 'silly' unnecessary re-designs of an ultra-expensive elevated road , solving practically nothing (traffic-wise) , but just to divert traffic as far as possible from someone's boundary wall .

Again precious FUNDS will be spent unwisely !

Anthony A. Mifsud

Aug 18th 2012, 15:59

In full agreement 100%
Ninu

C Cassar

Aug 18th 2012, 15:40

No it isn't. If you haven't got a parking space, can't afford to service it to the manufacturers specification at the stated service intervals you should not be allowed to own a car. Nobody has a right to anything in life because that right means living off someone else or causing someone else misery.

stephen mifsud

Aug 18th 2012, 17:03

ok i see so no freedom ,no rights a dictorial state is what you are saying ... now if you said only certain cars on certain days agree with that but what your supporting is not democrasy ... you dont have my vote on that one ...

Philip Bonello

Aug 18th 2012, 13:15

You couldn't have said it better. It would make sense for vehicles coming from Sliema Road to pass beneath those going through the regional road. But then we were never so logical in Malta.

BTW, similarly (with Europe bearing most of the cost of the ten-T road system) I would have expected a tunnel from Pwales to Ghadira rather than have all vehicle go up Xemxija hill, down to Mistra, up to Selmun and down again to Ghadira. But then, this is rocket science.

Tonio Bone

Aug 18th 2012, 13:20

Anthony I don't you got it right! The viaduct being proposed will leave Mikiel Anton Vassalli Street on almost the same level as when it meets Sliema road in the barren land just after Enemalta's sub-station. I do not believe there is going to be a steep climb!
Most definitely the people in the area were quite compact in their protest and rightfully or wrongfully got it their own way (although we are STILL at proposal stage). I understand their predicament at home having people whizzing by in cars at the same level as their bedroom window and let's face it, when they went to live there no flyovers were envisaged so we cannot go for the old adage 'they could have seen it coming'! Nevertheless nature does not speak for itself and nature will, yet again, bear the brunt of unrestricted development.
As for the point raised before me regarding our island being a concrete jungle....may I add that we are at a point of no return! The island is a continuous construction site and new monstrous apartment blocks continue to mushroom up ungracefully preceded by the ghastly site and inconvenient presence of tower cranes.
Restrictions and impositions continue on the everyday citizen whilst those that have strong lobbies continue do as they please.....all in the sake of generated GDP (officially)!

Anthony Pace Gouder

Aug 18th 2012, 16:12

@ Tonio Bone Definately then , this elevated CONNECTOR is not addressing the BIG REAL FRUSTRATING PROBLEM , that of having an unobstucted, safe, free traffic flow along the Regional Road.

Apparently this project will ONLY relieve the problem on just ONE flow , i.e, that of KAPPARA ORIGINATING south bound traffic , in AVOIDiING the existing Roundabout ! Then, without any doubt the easiest flow was from the Reg.Rd. left -side north-bound carriage way up Sliema Rd. Seems all other traffic , in whatever direction and destination , is destined to endure the everlasting Palmy 'Merry-go-Round' Oasis .

Anthony Pace Gouder

Aug 24th 2012, 11:25

@ Tonio Bone ........................... Seems that my intuition and sense of perspective was Right , as this proposed elevated road ( as I found out yesterday) WILL LINK UP , yet again , ON A PROPOSED NEW ROUNDABOUT that will occupy the last field bordering and just a FEW METERS down in Sliema Road ! This is but a stone's 'throw' away (>>>>>) from the existing Kappara R/A . This complex , costly 'proposal' will serve ' only ' as a connector between Upper Kappara and Gzira .

A. Mifsud

Aug 18th 2012, 12:24

it's a right to everyone to own a car Mr. Gatt. Do you own a car yourself? Most probably.

G G Debono

Aug 18th 2012, 13:37

To………A. Mifsud ……Today, 12:24

RE “- - it's a right to everyone to own a car”

Absolutely ! agree

BUT it’s also a DUTY not to use the car excessively.

Am Camilleri

Aug 18th 2012, 14:30

@ At A Mifsud - no . . . . its not. I don't own a car, tho I borrow one occasionally - but if it was my right to own one then of course I would, and so would my 7-yr old son!

Mr R.E. Saliba

Aug 19th 2012, 15:30

@Am Camilleri
Hope you're kidding and did actually understand A Mifsud's comment...
i.e. given that you have all the legal prerequisites, everyone has a right to buy a car.
These include age, license, financial means.

Anthony A. Mifsud

Aug 18th 2012, 12:30

Mak, do you possibly think that dr GATT give a toss on what you think? Or in that case what I think as a resident in the valley?
If it was Valletta that would be an other story.
Ninu

Anthony Pace Gouder

Aug 18th 2012, 14:33


A simple bridge , similar to the steel fly-over BUILT in the eighties over the roundabout at Sta. Venera , under Michael Falzon's Ministry , would suffice! This would also moderate the gradients on Kappara Hill and towards Tal-Qroqq Juncion .

This 'flly-over' would take up only two of the existing SIX LANES that converge, from a reasonably good distance, onto the roundabout .

Not a square centimeter of the Valley need be touched !

The immediate residents will not be bothered either , as the raised road will be just along the distant central part of the highway far and at a moderate height . With what I can fathom , its more likely , that a full view of the VILLA POOLS and gardens is more visible from the high deck of this ' extravagant ' highly expensive (24 Million ?) road on columns (viaduct?)

Basta giet imnaqqsa l-ispiza tal-Budgit ! Din xi Special Purpose Vehicle OHRA ?

The Hon. Miknister should know better WHERE such Viaducts should have been built ........... surely NOT along AND dominating this pleasant vale.

Mark Cassar

Aug 18th 2012, 21:45

Mr Mifsud, frankly if Dr Gatt, (and Dr de Marco, and for that matter Dr Gonzi) do not give a collective toss about what I think about this junction and others stretching the length and breadth of Malta, like at Msida and Hamrun then that proves that they are simply in the business of politics not to give a service to the populace. Now it is up to them.

Joe Vella

Aug 18th 2012, 11:23

Michael, the difference is that these residents, didn't just protest and thump their feet; They actually worked at it and came up with a possible solution.

Michael Borg

Aug 18th 2012, 12:57

@ vella the solution they provided is focused in their interest not the 1000 s of cars each day pass !! @ mscala they dismantled the recyling plant and built a new one they could have moved it somewhere else once they are building a new plant !! but !!!!! no leave at the south !!!!!!!

JJ Agius

Aug 18th 2012, 11:11

Dont you think It is allready a concrete Jungle? OK.Perhaps 99%! in most areas except Sliema 150%!!
Forget new Bridges new roads.We should send back Bendy busses to England all cars to Mars & start using Helicopters.
J.J.Agius

ANTHONY PAVIA

Aug 18th 2012, 12:01

Mr Pirotta, many people believe it already is nothing BUT a concrete jungle. No need to get airborne either. All you need do is go up to Tal Virtu', and from up there witness the proportion of buildings to empty land right down to the sea at all four corners.

G G Debono

Aug 18th 2012, 13:29

to jj agius

start using Helicopters. ----


and bicycles ...........

JJ Agius

Aug 18th 2012, 14:49

@GGDebono. According to nostradamus Malta will soon be under water so cannot use bicycles either!! a canoe Yeah!!Portomaso tower will be a lighthouse in the Middle of the Med!
Instead of a concrete Jungle a water paradice!!
J,J.

James Wightman

Aug 18th 2012, 15:21

@ JJ Agius... judging by the membership of the canoe club compared to the general population that's unlikely. Although like a bicycle it would be far more independent.... houseboat might be handy too.

G G Debono

Aug 18th 2012, 16:12

to ............JJ Agius ........................Today, 14:49

erm hope you know how to swim!

Advert
Advert