Advert

Minister discusses Cohabitation Bill with JPO

Photo: AFP

Photo: AFP

The Cohabitation Bill, to be placed on Parliament’s agenda when it meets again in October, was today discussed between Justice Minister Chris Said and independent MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando.

In a statement this afternoon, Dr Pullicino Orlando said that during his meeting, issues on the rights of cohabiting couples in general and gay couples in particular were discussed and approved.

“I found Minister Said to be very receptive to the issues I raised. This should help to make the bill (due to be published imminently) more relevant to the realities of Maltese society in today's world.”

Dr Pullicino Orlando said he considered an IVF bill which guaranteed the full protection of human embryos and a cohabitation bill which gave due consideration to the rights of gay couples to be priorities when it came to issues Parliament should deal as soon as it reconvened.

“I am very satisfied that both these issues are being treated with the urgency they deserve by the Nationalist government. 

“I obviously reserve the right to present amendments to both bills, when government presents them in their final version, at the opportune moment if I feel that it may be necessary,” Dr Pullicino Orlando said.

Advert

69 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

P Bonnici

Aug 18th 2012, 14:40

This picture looks disgusting because you are not used to seeing it.

Hundred years ago you would have been disgusted seeing women is short sleeves and a swimming suit.

Martin Saliba

Aug 18th 2012, 12:37

God forbid if any offspring of the present MPS in parliament would have to experience such behaviour of sexual orientation.

On the contrary Mr. Pace , hopefully we will have a few MP's who have gay children so that they can understand better the rights gay people are fighting for. Just for the record , i am not gay but have allways beieved in the same rights for all irespective of the sexua orientation given to them by god.

Martin Saliba

Aug 18th 2012, 12:30

What has god to forgive them for ?? Are you being caucious or did you forget to tel them that they will be sinning ?? It is people like you who should seek forgivness for judging others. You and your church have only the right to direct its followers but you have no right to condem.

P Bonnici

Aug 18th 2012, 12:14

Henry S Pace, you would fit nicely amongst the fundamentalist Christians in the USA. I suggest you emigrate there.

Martin Saliba

Aug 18th 2012, 12:21

Be sure to repeat what you wrote to your child or grand child should they come to you and say that they are gay. 10% of the world popuation is gay , so do the maths.

Barney Camilleri

Aug 18th 2012, 07:53

M. Grech
I agree with your statement 100 PER CENT.
However the whole issue is put to shame, when we have ONE individual putting our democracy under his thumb, becoming as equal if not more as all the members of the governing party. They either agree with his whimsical dictatum or he topple the government. I grew believing the purpose why a civilized nation elect representatives is to service, not for one politician dictate his agenda and interest, when this legislation was elected on a different platform.

Paul Attard

Aug 17th 2012, 22:21

I think Mr Gonzi only has himself to blame for the situation.

B. Cachia

Aug 18th 2012, 09:52

It's also pathetic how the Government spent five years boasting that it does not care if it will lose votes and, now that it has actually lost them, has become desperate and is trying to delay an election for as long as possible, no matter how many humiliations are heaped on its head.

JPO (and the others) are merely a symptom: they exist only as long as the government fears an election. The real disease is a party leadership that has ridden roughshod over the public's wishes and interests and has, to boot, achieved only the most mediocre results by going its own lonely way.

Redd Caruana

Aug 17th 2012, 20:38

It's time to stop blaming society for your misfortune with men.

Your life is wasted when "gay" is the only thing you are. Good guys will approach you when you come to terms with your sexuality and move on to being a better individual. Arguing with cowards about rights that shouldn't define your lifestyle won't help your image.

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Aug 18th 2012, 00:24

Laws are important and necessary for gay men and lesbians but gay men and lesbians should not allow discriminatory laws to affect how they live. Happiness and legislation are not one and the same thing.

Claudio Cilia

Aug 18th 2012, 02:34

I already came to terms with my sexuality ..if I didn't I would have wrote such a thing Redd.. lol ..and I don't have misfortune if it's really a concern

Charles Bayliss

Aug 17th 2012, 19:14

You might be a little bit wrong with your comment. This was in a PN electoral programme (1998) but deferred for 14 years. It is high time that a long awaited promise as brought to light with some minor adjustments to reflect today's realities.

Ramon Casha

Aug 17th 2012, 19:41

If we have to organise a €4 million referendum every time something crops up that was not in the electoral program we either would get nothing done, or have no money left to do anything.

m. borg (slm)

Aug 18th 2012, 09:42

Mr Bayliss an electoral programm is only good for the 5 years of that legislature.

It should have been repeated in succeeding electoral programms but since pn/gonzipn wouldn't want to look that they are unable to deliver they simply ignore it next time round, like it would have been, hadn't it been mentioned of late in parliament.

Mario Buhagiar

Aug 17th 2012, 21:09

Nipreferi nkun mrobbi minn koppja gay LI JHOBBUNI u li dejjem nirreferi ghalihom milli fi stitut kulhadd barrani , u wara 18 il-sena ma jkolli l-ebda idea fejn nista naghti rasi. ma nafx jien. u wara l-iskandli kollha li nqalghu mill-istituti xi 3 snin ilu... ma tantx huma

Josephine Borg

Aug 17th 2012, 21:40

Tom

I.Mercieca, lewwel nett cohabitation bill ma ghandux x'jaqsam l'addozzjoni ...

It-tnieni haga ghandek zball Kbir jekk tahseb Li sfortuna Ghax iktar Ghandi nafda zewg genituri Li lesti Li jisdakrifikaw ruhom ghal decisjoni bhal dik milli ohrajn jabbuzaw min natura u is sistema Li takkomodhom. 

Jien omm u rabbejt Tfal bhal haddiehor ... Illum Ghandi Tfal gay u kburija Ghax responsabli u lesti Li jammlu kollox ghal familja. Huma nies bmohhom malluqa Li jamlu il bsaten fit-roti. Iva l-Europa hija wahda gusta ghal kulhadd u Kull ligi ghadd trid tigi implementata. Il knisja MA ghandiex taqsam mal istatt u listatistika turi bicc carr Li genituri gay huma produtivi daqs jekk mhux iktar min dawk mhux gay. Huma in nies mohhom maluqa Li ghamlu min kollox biex jibbulijaw. 

Malcolm Meilak

Aug 17th 2012, 23:44

Jien minkiex huk

Mary Borg

Aug 18th 2012, 09:11

Il-knisja ghandha d-dritt u d-dmir li tghid li thoss skond it-tghalim taghha, mitt darba u elf imma l-gvern ghandu d-dritt u d-dmir li jara li kull persuna li tahdem u thallas it-taxxi ma tigix iddiskriminata. Mhux kulhadd uman? Ma nahsibx li l-gvern joqghod jghid 'ara Cikku gay mela l-flus tat-taxxi tieghu ma rridhomx'. La gvern johodhom u jqisu bhala ugwali f'dak li joholdlu ghandu jqisu ugwali f'dak li jaghtih, dritt civili u baziku. Barra minn hekk il-koabittazzjoni mhux biss fuq il-gays imma fuq koppji etero li jghixu flimkien bla ma jizzewgu, ahwa single li jibqghu jghixu d-dar wahedhom ecc.

Mario Buhagiar

Aug 17th 2012, 21:06

ghala le? nipreferi nkun addottat min kopja gay milli nigi mrobbi minn stitut bxi 30 tifel/tifla ohra mieghi, b'xi 10 patrijiet jew sorijiet jiehdu hsiebi, u wara 18 il-sena jqactuni lbarra mill-istitut u ma jkolli xejn fuq xiex nahlef. Jew inkella nkun ed mmut bil guh u ghatx fl-Indja jew xi pajjiz ta l-Afrika. Ma nafx jien imma familja gay hi hafna iktar "familja" minn stitut jew orfanu mejjet bil-guh.

Ahseb minn fejn ha jigu t-tfal li jigu addottati. Ma jkunux qieghdin f'palazz f'familja tradizjonali u jittiehdu minn kopja gay, imma jittiehdu minn post ta' tbatija.

Franco Farrugia

Aug 17th 2012, 18:33

Yes. It is. I agree with you. Completely. And this is 'democracy'.

Martin Saliba

Aug 18th 2012, 12:15

Of course we havnt forgotten his past. Hopefully he will be given the medal for " Gieh ir republica ". He was guts to present a bill which gave great relief to many Maltese couples who needed divorce. Other have been awarded the medal for much Less.

Joe Fenech

Aug 18th 2012, 17:14

Yes, fine - but that's not because he's a hero but because Malta is stuck in the middle ages. He has been involved in other stuff which has never been investigated.

Hubert Paul Farrugia

Aug 17th 2012, 17:21

why not? aren't they women with the natural ability to be mothers too?

Charles Bayliss

Aug 17th 2012, 17:23

Ignorance at it's best. Who are we and what right have we to say NO. I in certain aspects am against gay adoption, but one cannot cut a straight line. There are gay people who deserve adoptions.

Tommy Vella

Aug 17th 2012, 17:47

@ Charles Bayliss

You have got the wrong end of the stick Charles. PARENTS (be they gay or otherwise) never deserve adoption. They should do it as a service to the child. Adoption is for the child not the Parents. It is the maxim in adoption that when a child needs to be adopted every effort is made to give that child the best possible parents and the ones most suited to his/her needs.

Charles Bayliss

Aug 17th 2012, 18:58

@ Tommy Vella

I was referring to partners of gay dads and mums who also make sacrifices to help in the bringing up of the child/ren. Do they not deserve to be called a parent too? They accept to help bring up their partner's siblings as if their own. So why not accepting legal adoption to these people?

Ms. P.M Graham

Aug 17th 2012, 20:53

Joe Fenech, when there is not one child seeking a mother or a father then perhaps you can think about discrimination.

When there is not one child who wakens in the morning desperate to be the most important person in one persons life. Then you can start discriminating.

When there is not one child who goes to bed praying for a parent, then you can start discriminating.

Until then don't!!

Tommy Vella

Aug 18th 2012, 09:10

@ Charles Bayliss

What you say does not make sense. A married couple with kids separate and the mother with custody of the children goes to live with another woman.

Are you suggesting that the mother's partner adopts the kids? Where does that leave the father? He has already been denied his family, would you also deny him of his legal rights as a father? Would the adoption by the mother's partner not take his place as a father?

What would then be the kids legal standing with regard to hereditary rights from the father? Or would the law allow kids to have three parents? What you are suggesting is a right muddle.

Eddy Privitera

Aug 17th 2012, 17:19

Philip Hili: " This bill is intended to safeguard the rights of those who are already in this state " !!!

Wouldn't this not mean "legalising cohabitation " ? ? And are you dreaming that this Bill will not be legalising FUTURE couples who decide to cohabit rather then get married ???

I believe you are one of those who cannot believe that a GonziPn government will ever do something which goes against the Church's teaching. You are wrong. Now GonziPN has to do what Dr. JPO orders it to do !

Joseph Mizzi

Aug 17th 2012, 16:48

And we'll be in the same ship if AD manages to get one seat in Parliament.

Alexander Pace Gouder.

Aug 17th 2012, 16:57

Agree.

Philip Hili

Aug 17th 2012, 17:00

@ Joseph Mizzi

I am very sorry Mr. Mizzi, I beg to defer.

We will not be in the same ship if AD manage to get one seat in Parliament. Parliament will be in the very worst situation parliament can face. Now the government has to consult with this disloyal person and so the consultation is one to one, with the AD in parliament any party in power will have to consult with the group of people (AD) and not with one person only!

J.C. Borg

Aug 17th 2012, 17:26

@ Joseph Borg - If you think that JPO is our PM (God forbids with the way he does things), it will not last long. After a few months he will live in the wilderness.

Michael Sciortino

Aug 17th 2012, 19:07

@Philip Hili. I think that it is you that got it wrong. The PL will certainly get 33 or 34 seats in the next parliament and therefore if AD gets one seat the PL will still have a working majority in Parliament. AD will never hold the balance of power with one seat.

Ronnie Callus

Aug 17th 2012, 17:04

It depends what you are expecting isn't it ???

Advert
Advert