Frequent power cuts that hurt consumers
Frequent power cuts are usually associated with Third World countries struggling to build a solid infrastructure to support their economic ambitions. Malta is no such country and its economy can hardly be described as developing.
Yet power cuts have become too frequent, much to the frustration of businesses and other long-suffering consumers who cannot choose where to procure their energy services.
This summer, many areas in Malta experienced repeated power cuts that have cost businesses substantial amounts in lost trade. Families with senior citizens and young children had to cope with long stressful periods when they could not even use a fan in the scorching heat that has characterised the summer.
These cuts have become so frequent that they hardly make the media headlines. Be that as it may, such outages should not be happening in a country that is projecting itself as a haven for investment and a paradise for tourists.
Even more remarkable is the attitude taken by Enemalta, the state monopoly that provides energy services in this country. Whenever a power cut occurs, it is usually slow to explain why its customers have to suffer the consequences.
The best reaction it can come up with is to inform the public that it intends to launch an inquiry. This is simply not good enough.
Energy consumers in Malta are paying electricity rates that are among the highest in Europe. Yet they have to make do with a service by Enemalta that leaves much to be desired.
The political masters of Enemalta try to shift responsibility for the power cuts to the management on grounds that power failures are really an operational issue. But common sense and principles of good governance of public services clearly indicate that when a monopoly service provider fails its customers, responsibility must ultimately be shouldered by politicians.
Enemalta has been mired in controversy for more than a decade. Lack of adequate investment has resulted in a stuttering energy generating and distribution infrastructure.
The Marsa power station that was scheduled to be decommissioned years ago is still belching poisonous gases and causing health problems for the heavily populated towns located in the vicinity.
When new investment for the power station in Delimara was finally approved, the purchasing process as well as the technical aspects of the chosen equipment raised doubts as to how beneficial this expensive investment will really be.
Consumer protection is at the very core of the EU’s mission. Many countries take this mission very seriously and regulators impose tough penalties on service providers that short-change their customers. Serious resources regulators should not be more lenient with services providers that enjoy monopolistic or dominant position advantages in their market.
Yet in Malta, do we hear of the resources authority defending the customers of Enemalta which is frequently failing to provide an adequate level of service?
Whether the root cause of the frequent power cuts is the result of lack of sufficient investment in the past, or the consequence of operational mismanagement by Enemalta, or a combination of both, the government should inform the public how it intends to address these serious failings of the energy provider.
The time for hollow apologies and inquiries is over. It is time to treat energy consumers with respect. Politicians must stop hiding and start acting.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Gaetano Mallia
Aug 17th 2012, 15:55
Energy consumers are being short-changed in more ways than one. Besides the frequent power cuts they are also made to pay estimated power consumption which is almost always too high with the result that Enemalta is getting interest free credit which is then offset against future bills. I think it is high time that consumers are charged for what they actually consume and not what Enemalta estimates they consume.
Emanuel Farrugia
Aug 16th 2012, 21:28
In my opinion, a to the point Editorial which highlights consumer " hurt ". Of course the consumer is hurt. When the Electricity supply is cut off for whatever reason , the consumer cannot ; 1. Use the domestic appliances he has at home, such as Refrigerator and electric fans and Air Conditioner which make life a bit more comfortable.
2. If the supply is cut off at home, the consumer may have to postpone his Dialysis treatment until the power comes back.
3. When the power comes back, unless this is done in a controlled manner, the consumer will really be " hurt " by the number of domestic appliances in his/her residence which may suffer damage.
4. If the consumer has a beautician appointment, they may be hurt when their beauty treatment is suddenly put on hold.
The heading says ; " Frequent power cuts that hurt consumers ". They " hurt ", cause inconvenience , and compensation is obtained by the consumer like extracting the cork from a wine bottle.
Martin Cassar
Aug 16th 2012, 18:54
Quote:
Malta is no such country and its economy can hardly be described as developing.
The above statement lacks accuracy as Malta is not one of the G8 economies or the G 20 countries. so Malta is developing country.
M Cassar
Aug 16th 2012, 21:40
Where did you get this strange definition of a developing economy?
Ireland, Belgium and Norway are not members of the G8 or G20 but they can hardly be described as 'developing economies'.
Paul Salnitro
Aug 16th 2012, 11:08
I do not think this editorial is intellectually honest.
Enemalta are not to blame here.
Simply put the number, type and size of the generator sets available in Malta do not reflect the demand. Tonio Fenech always says we have enough total generating capacity (540MW) but what he fails to explain is how those 540MW are distributed, He knows that machines under maintenance, with limited working hours available (EU restrictions), or of a certain type mean that not all the capacity can be used. So much so that most the power cuts people experience are called 'planned outages' in which loads (people) are turned off due to machine limitations the company already knows about.
Enemalta has been hard at work, the distribution has been improved vastly but the main problem remains lack of vision, the current administration had all the time in the world to create an energy strategy and implement it. Instead we got incompetence, botched and seriously suspicious contracting and lots of false promises.
There is only one place to lay blame and that is the government, they had all the time in the world to make the necessary investments and instead decided to waste time and act in less then transparent ways.
M Cassar
Aug 16th 2012, 15:06
What do you mean by 'intellectually honest'?
This leader rightly pins the blame on Enemalta and their political masters i.e the government. If the Enemalta directors are not just puppets on a string, they should resign especially if their advice is not being heeded by the shareholder i.e. government.
Please choose the reason of your report below: