Advert

Labour’s Air Malta board dropped the RJs inquiry

File photo by Gino Galea.

File photo by Gino Galea.

A Labour-appointed Air Malta board cancelled an important inquiry into the controversial RJ70s fleet ordered by the previous board, The Sunday Times has learnt.

It would not have addressed the fundamental problem with the RJs’ purchase
- Louis Grech

Former chairman Louis Grech admitted his board stopped the inquiry in 1997 and instead appointed a non-Maltese company specialising in aviation matters to draw up a report on all aspects relating to the selection on purchase of the Avro RJs.

According to Mr Grech, the report had concluded that opting for the Avro liners was “a high risk and costly decision”, which was extremely detrimental to Air Malta at the time and would haunt the airline for years to come.

Sources close to Air Malta told this newspaper Mr Grech’s new disclosure is not documented in the company’s board minutes.

Confronted with this information yesterday, Mr Grech said a long time had passed and he was not sure that this information was minuted.

“It should be, but I don’t exactly recall,”he said.

Mr Grech did not wish to name the non-Maltese company that reported on all the aspects of the Avro purchase.

The issue over the 1994 RJs’ purchase was resurrected some weeks ago after former Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando alleged Richard Cachia Caruana – a former Air Malta director – had colluded with the 1996-1998 Labour government.

Mr Cachia Caruana denied the allegations - supported by an affidavit by ex-Labour Minister Karmenu Vella – and instead challenged Dr Pullicino Orlando to publish the conclusions of an inquiry the board had ordered to find those responsible for omitting crucial trip guarantee costs from the purchase.

Last week, The Sunday Times revealed that former Judge Godwin Muscat Azzopardi – who was entrusted to conduct this inquiry – had been told to abort his investigation.

However, Judge Muscat Azzopardi did not recall why, nor who had given the order to stop.

In his replies, Mr Grech, who was appointed Air Malta chairman a few days after the previous board’s resignation in 1997, said the inquiry was stopped as its scope would not have addressed the fundamental problem with the purchase of the RJs.

“It should not have taken the former Air Malta board almost three years to realise that the trip cost guarantee did not form part of the final contractual agreement of the RJs, especially since it was clearly evident that the trip cost was excessively high from the very start of the RJs operation,” he said.

He also said this crucial trip cost guarantee was again excluded in the purchase contract of another fleet of aircraft; the RJ85s bought two years after the RJ70s.

Irrespective of the inquiry’s outcome, Mr Grech said: “It seemed evident to the new board that it was in fact the former board of directors that had to shoulder the responsibility, particularly those executive directors who were directly responsible and involved in the supervision of the negotiations and signing of the final contract with the manufacturer.”

When contacted, Anthony J. Paris, who was executive director at Air Malta when the RJs were bought, said he did not recollect the report by the “non-Maltese company” cited by Mr Grech.

Turning the tables on to the former Air Malta chairman, Mr Paris said: “The RJ85 contract was signed during the tenure of Louis’s board.

The new board (chaired by Mr Grech) could have stopped the purchase of the RJ85s and simply lost the deposit,” he charged.

Advert

44 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Philip Hili

Aug 13th 2012, 09:26

@ Alfred Falzon

"It sounds fishy on both sides..."

Why from both sides? The PN had nothing to hide at that time, so much so that the PN is enquiring why the report of the enquiry was not published. Don't forget, the minister in charge of Air Malta at that time was Karmenu Vella, one of the prime witnesses in the RCC case.

As per yesterday's news - back page of the "Sunday Times of Malta", it was during the then chairman appointed by Dr. Alfred Sant when the enquiry report was stopped, WHY, and WHO gave instructions to stop the enquiry?? At that time, the Chairman was the Labour MEP Mr. Louis Borg. I ask again, ANY WRONG DOINGS? Because if there were no wrong doings from any side, the enquiry report must have been concluded and made public so that the tax payer rests his mind that what was being fabricated at that time with regards the RJ 70's was either true or untrue!

On the other hand, if there was something wrong and which was committed by the PREVIOUS board of Directors appointed by the PN administration, what kept Karmenu Vella from publishing the enquiry report? Surely not because he or the Labour administration wanted to hide such delicate information from the tax payer, which information the tax payer had every right to know, taking into consideration the attacks on certain high ranking people in the administration of the company!!!!!

Lino Busuttil

Aug 12th 2012, 17:44

You are wrong, there were questions raised and an inquiry but somehow the bad guys won over the good guys and it was all hushed up.

GEORGE S DARMANIN

Aug 12th 2012, 12:33

the thing is that RCC claimed that he along with the board approved the contract with a specific condition but someone removed that clause without their or at least his knowledge. So yes the inquiry should have been able to identify who did this, but wonder of wonders LP does not want o point fingers, oh except to RCC and other PN persons. Hallina trid.

Willie Grech

Aug 12th 2012, 11:58

@ Angelo Vassallo.

Mhux ahjar titghallem taqra li hemm quddiemek l-ewwel? Jew ma tifhimx bl-Ingliz?

"However, Judge Muscat Azzopardi did not recall why, nor who had given the order to stop."

Wally Vella-Zarb

Aug 12th 2012, 12:12

Iż-żejt ilu f’wiċċ l-ilma għal min għandu għajnejh miftuħin. Iż-żewġ kuntratti ta’ xiri tal-RJs saru minn bord ta’ diretturi politikament maħtur minn u fi żmien gvern nazzjonalista ta' EFA. Edba xiri ta’ RJs ma sar fi żmien il-gvern Laburista ta' Alfred Sant. Kulmin hu onest jafu dan.

Jimmy Magro

Aug 12th 2012, 16:16

Sur Vassallo
Jekk trid tikteb bil-Malti, il-kelma Lejburista ma tezistix. Tkomplix izzeblah il-lingwa Maltija. Lejburista trid tiktibha kif suppost - LABURISTA.

Il-Malti jixraqlu ahjar. Min izeblah il-lingwa Maltija jkun qed izeblah lilu nnifsu.

Anthony Agius

Aug 12th 2012, 11:17

What really concerns Airmalta employees (also taxpayers and honest workers) is who is going to feed their families when everything comes tumbling down! RCC? Louis Grech? JN Tabone? Gonzi? Karmenu Vella? PETER DAVIES?

Anthony Agius

Aug 12th 2012, 11:22

Nobody wants to listen to Captain Dominic Azzopard president of the pilots' union! That is the real problem!

Anthony Agius

Aug 12th 2012, 11:23

All the people you mentioned had their fingers in the pie at some time or another! We pay for it with our taxes

Victor Vella

Aug 12th 2012, 13:14

Mr Saliba Why you do not ask your PN to make the inquiry as well? We know your convenient amnesia clouds and other beautiful words . Ask the chairman of that time JNTabone and the board of directors and you find the answer to your beautiful words and bigotry.

Evarist Saliba

Aug 13th 2012, 10:13

@ Victor Vella
As usual, you side step the issue.
The enquiry was aborted when Karmenu Vella was the minister responsible for Air Malta and J.N. Tabone was no longer connected with the airline.
As for enquiries now, I have had experience under Labour administartions (recorded in my memoires) when orders were given orally, but not confirmed in writing, when this was requested. The amnesia being shown now confirms that this was standard practice when convenient.

And just in case your blinkers do not allow you to see the whole picture, I am not defending Air Malta for selecting the RJ70's. I am only saying that no one is contradicting Richard Cachia Caruana's claim that this choice was conditional on a clause in the contract saveguarding Air Malta's interests, a clause which was omitted by unknown subordinates, and attempts to establishwho was responsible for this omission were scuppered under the Labour administration that followed.

Frans Aguis

Aug 12th 2012, 11:43

You do realize that the "labour involvement " in this issue is minimal.And Dr Sant asked the board to drop the inquiry and gave the job to a more objective external entity. The headline is just there so fanatics like you would be more prone to click on it.The timesofmalta know they're clientele well enough.

Anthony Agius

Aug 12th 2012, 11:25

If Airmalta goes bankrupt, taxpayers will have more to worry about! Malta will go into recession big time!

Manuel Mangani

Aug 12th 2012, 12:53

Speak for yourself, Mr. Cassar. There are plenty of tax-payers who are interested in getting to know about the whole process which led to the infamous decision.

Anthony Agius

Aug 12th 2012, 11:26

If Judge is suffering from loss of memory, he should be relieved of his duties.....

carmel cassar

Aug 12th 2012, 11:49

An enquiery precided by a judge, and there is no annotation in the enquiry file who has given the order, and reasons for it. Do we have judges too now that they make mistakes in documenting, like what we had with poloce officer, because of whom a charge was dropped lately. ONLY IN MALTA?

Advert
Advert