People keep dying in Syria
When the western powers intervened in Libya to save the Libyan people from the merciless violence of the Gaddafi regime, China and Russia opposed. On Syria, the roles remain much the same.
The result is uncontrolled violence of immense proportions spreading from one city to another with the second city of Aleppo now under siege. The UN estimates that more than 10,000 people have been killed in Syria so far, whereas 1.5 million have been displaced internally and several thousand others fled into neighbouring countries.
The death toll in Syria will continue to rise as the violence intensifies further and intervention in Syria – an extreme measure of final resort – is becoming the last remaining option for saving the Syrian people. Hopes for a negotiated solution have been slowly ebbing.
You might have missed the news that, on August, 2, Kofi Annan, the UN and Arab League special envoy to Syria, resigned his post because of the failure of his peace plan, which had been endorsed by the UN Security Council in April.
All the while, the UN General Assembly voted by a staggering 131 votes in favour, 12 against and 31 abstentions in favour of a resolution sponsored by the Arab League condemning “the increasing use by the Syrian authorities of heavy weapons, including indiscriminate shelling from tanks and helicopters, in population centres and the failure to withdraw its troops and the heavy weapons to their barracks…”.
The General Assembly’s resolution has only moral force and it is not binding. It is the UN Security Council that has binding authority and that is the only body that can order the use of force. But, 15 days ago, it failed to adopt a resolution that merely threatened sanctions against Syria if it did not end violence against civilians. Unsurprisingly, the resolution was, yet again, vetoed by China and Russia. As a result, the Syrian regime felt reassured that it could get away with impunity. And the killing spree goes on.
At the time of writing, several districts of Aleppo are under heavy siege by the Syrian army. It is one big scary mess. And fighting is taking place in many other parts of the country too.
The Syrian army controls the main cities and urban centres while the rest of the country remains under rebel control.
On its part, the opposition is becoming bolder and more determined. It still lacks the sophisticated arms to match the government forces. But it is getting its hands on more and more arms that are being smuggled across the country’s porous borders.
The international consensus remains that the fighting must be brought to an end as quickly as possible and that President Bashar Al Assad must leave immediately to open the door for a political settlement. Clearly, he has no place in a lasting political solution.
Some of those who take a more lenient view of Russia’s role say that even Russian patience is not to be taken for granted. They argue that the Russians would prefer Mr Assad to remain in power but if his tactics are going to make a peaceful resolution of the conflict impossible, then he had better go. If that happens, then Mr Assad is as good as gone.
All the neighbouring countries want him out. Except, of course, Iran.
Many believe that this violent civil war may only end with his assassination or with a palace coup that would remove him from power. But until that happens, more and more civilians are dying.
Just last month, the EU further strengthened sanctions against the Syrian regime whereas the European Commission doubled aid for emergency medical care, shelter, food and water to those Syrians who are most affected by the worsening crisis, both inside and outside the country. An additional €20 million of relief aid brought the total EU assistance to €63 million.
The enforcement of the EU arms embargo against Syria is also strengthened as EU countries inspect vessels and aircraft heading to Syria if they suspect that the cargo contains arms or equipment for the regime. This measure is implemented in EU seaports and airports as well as in their territorial waters.
The assets of three entities supporting the regime were frozen and the total number of Syrians slapped with sanctions and travel bans increased.
By the time you read this article, the fate of Aleppo might have been decided. But the fate of Syria would not have been settled. Innocent civilians are paying the heavy price of war when all they wanted was freedom. It is the freedom that you and I take for granted.
President Assad must understand that Syrians too have a right to dignity and freedom. The question is: How many more of his countrymen must die before he does so?
simon.busuttil@europarl.europa.eu
Dr Busuttil is a Nationalist member of the European Parliament.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
GL Calleja
Aug 8th 2012, 16:56
" Many believe that this violent civil war may only end with his assassination or with a palace coup that would remove him from power. " That day will come but it will be too late for the thousands of innocent Syrians that are being killed everyday. Why is the whole world idly watching? I agree that the West and the rest of Europe do not get directly involved in a civil war but the rest of the Arab Countries should. This man is another replica of Muammar Gaddafi and he must go. This is a David fighting Goliath and the West, the rest of Europe and the rest of the world should make sure that it is an even battle and provide the necessary tools and arsenal to the people. Right now Assad is fighting a one street battle because he does not have a fair equipped opposition. The rest of the world except for Russia and China have to help arm the rebels and make this an even fight. Like his predecessor Assad will fall and hopefully brought in front of the World Human Rights Court, or maybe like Egyptian President Mubarak be judged by his own peers. It is only a matter of when. This hateful dictator must be gotten rid of and fast.
P Sciberras
Aug 8th 2012, 16:56
Simon in my comment for your last article i did asked you about the real situation in Egypt,where after a democratic election the regime is still in full power.I taught that you was going to comment about the real situation there, not looking at the situation from your convenience,but the REAL situation. This time I will dare to ask you to comment about the 47 years conflict and the illegal settlements in the occupied land in the Middle East, both condemned by the UN.
Martin Cassar
Aug 8th 2012, 22:00
@ P Sciberras.
This time I will dare to ask you to comment about the 47 years conflict and the illegal settlements in the occupied land in the Middle East, both condemned by the UN.
Do you seriously think that Dr. Simon Busuttil could condemn this inhuman decades old illegal occupation by the Zionists gangs? If he does he will lose his job in few hours and he will be a non-grata on the USA' soil
Charles Grixti
Aug 8th 2012, 14:57
How is it that Assad 's regime is now evil? Have they forgotten how US terror suspects used to be flown there for torture and questioning?
Emanuel Muscat
Aug 8th 2012, 11:38
I don't think the 'west' should interfere in the problems of Syria:it is part of the religious war going on between the sunni and the shite branches of islam:does it not remind you of the religious wars between the catholics and the protestants 400-500 years ago?
It is also a war where the islamists cannot blame the west for starting it :there comes a time were every civilisation has to solve its own problems:if a third party interferes,the two 'combatants' will go for the 'jugular' of the 'interference'!
M. Hills
Aug 8th 2012, 11:05
If an armed insurgence happened in Malta how would PM Gonzi tackle it? When Law and Order is overuled? However many concessions you make nothing is enough except Regime Change as what the western powers want and each side uses the other for their own agendas??and what are the hidden Agendas of the western powers except to help Israel attack Iran and cause mayhem in the world? It is the rebels from Birmingham jihad shiites who are killing Syrian children or causing Assad to defend Syria by taking these extreme methods unfortunately to counteract these rebels armed by the West.
We know what happened in Iraq,in Egypt and in Libya...Is the finale an all out dominance by Israel and the the USA of the whole of the Middle East??
Charles Grixti
Aug 8th 2012, 15:01
I agree with your comments except for the conclusions. The way I see it this is a Sunni/Shite war, with the US and the West clearly on the Sunni side (after all the Saudis are great friends and allies). Israel will be surrounded by hostile countries and with its back to the wall. This is what the fundamentally anti-Semitic West want, despite all the rhetoric to the contrary. Then maybe Iran and Israel will annhiliate each other and everyone will be happy.
Please choose the reason of your report below: