Advert

Interest-subsidy scheme for home buyers announced

Dr Chris Said.

Dr Chris Said.

The government has announced an interest subsidy scheme for first time buyers wishing to purchase a house from the private sector.

The scheme was announced by Justice Minister Chris Said and will be open for a year of for the first 300 applications.

They will benefit from an interest subsidy of up to 2.5% on borrowing from the banks of up to €80,000. The savings could reach €14,500. 

Dr Said said the subsidy would be given for a period of between eight and ten years. The scheme would be administered by the Housing Authority.

Meanwhile, Dr Said said the scheme called Darek Faċli, through which the Housing Authority put 115 apartments, eight maisonettes and 98 garages on the market, had been very well received.

The properties were offered with subsidies of up to 25% on their commercial value.  The Authority received 833 applications, which are now being processed. 

Advert

41 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Robert Agius

Aug 9th 2012, 10:56

'Total value of of FINISHED property should not exceed EUR 120,000 (in case of the current interest subsidy scheme).'

We all would like to start off with a villa. What do you expect?? Subsidy on a property worth 250,000Euro for 1st time buyers perhaps?

'I also find it unfair that a couple with two incomes exceeding the stipulated limit of xx amount per person, would be eligible to benefit from the scheme, while a single parent exceeding the amount stipulated would not be eligible.'

And what about those who are single, or choose not to have a family, and want property, if you think that is unfair?

Robert Agius

Aug 9th 2012, 11:01

Mhux gust li tiehu minn ghand wiehed biex taghtih lill iehor?

Er...are you telling us that a person earning 100,000 Euro a year, should pay the same amount of tax as much as someone earning 10,000 Euro a year?

M Attard

Aug 9th 2012, 14:42

@ R Aguis: I'm tellling you that I feel it's not fair that while I myself have to pay my own loans/debt on my own first house I am forced to help others pay their own debts. There were even times long when people used to be given generous plots of land with substanial sums of money. This was even worse. Of course I agree that the a person who makes more money is expected to pay more tax; but the tax collected belongs to the whole country; it has to be used to the benefit of ALL; not given to a few who have a loan like me. In this country there are those who are always benefiting somehow or other; and then there are those who never get anything.

Robert Agius

Aug 9th 2012, 08:21

Although you have a point, please tell me how ' a one working member - with minimum wage and an undeclared part time, another member registering for work, without the intent of ever working, having had 3 kids declared as unknown father' will be granted a loan in the 1st place.

Wenzu Vella

Aug 9th 2012, 08:31

Dear Adrian you seem to know all the short cuts for an easy life, so what is stopping you doing the same if it is so good? You know what they say if you cannot beat them join them. GOOD LUCK..

Edward Camilleri

Aug 9th 2012, 08:36

You cannot have said it better Arian!

ANTHONY PAVIA

Aug 9th 2012, 08:43

Yes you are right. Unfortunately, this is pure socialism Nationalist Party style. This is what has contributed to dilute taxpayers monies over these years and balloon our national debt. Free this, free that, free this again, free that again, subsidies, allowances, burgeoning public sector etc, etc, etc, etc. The PN has turned more socialist than socialists themselves. The socialists have upgraded their policies in line with modern thinking, and are enjoying a merited revival. However, the PN has turned to socialist's policies only for the end benefit of some. And that is the real problem the electorate is experiencing.

Adrian Borg

Aug 9th 2012, 08:56

@ Wenzu Vella - i'm sure that everyone knows the shortcuts, but there are some people who still prefer to be educated, honest and committed.....Ever heard of of people who steal for an easy life? people who pass 'bord' declaring they are un-fit for work, when they are? people who fake disability for an insurance payout which sets them for life? Being aware of such things, doesn't mean that i would be ready to follow such practices

Mr Tony Gatt

Aug 9th 2012, 08:58

@ Adrian Borg.

In he U.K. a 16 -year-old becoming pregnant (father unknown- we have virgin births here!) is in line for a council flat, gratis, free and for nothing, with housing benefits etc. etc. etc.

It's a career move for some.

A Vella

Aug 9th 2012, 09:25

That is Socialism for you

A Vella

Aug 9th 2012, 09:32

@Anthony, true what you said, apart from the last part which is just idealism and nothing more. But we are screwed because The LP is proposing much more of this, say subsidised W&E, living wage, and wasting more money running after youngsters who want to live this life, amongst others.

Jo Gatt

Aug 9th 2012, 09:24

JB, that was my question as well. Why only the first 300? Surely if it is an incentive for first time home buyers, it should be a standard policy for EVERY first time home buyer. People get married almost every day.

I would have thought that first time home buyers struggle more with the deposit and fees to buy a house, so why don't they arrange a way that the deposit and fees be included in the mortgage... THAT will make it easier for new, young home owners.

John Scerri

Aug 9th 2012, 09:00

Bhal ma ghamel il MLP qabel l-elezjoni 1996...wieghed l-ilma jizfen imbaghad meta tela splodew il kontijiet tad dawl barra taxxi ohra.

Tiftakar ic-cittadin mobile , cittadin hemm u cittadin hawn.

Labour hu paroli biss ghandu ghax lanqas Marie Louise Coleiro Preca ma tat proposta wahda l-bierah . Basta inpacpcu u jippretendu l-voti taghna ? LE . Vot fuq Kaxxa maghluqa hu vot mohli .

A Lepre

Aug 9th 2012, 10:56

yepp....there's always a catch.... There are usually other conditions, such as value of FINISHED property cannot exceed EUR 120 000. Also, the applicant's annual income is a factor which determines whether one would be eligible or not.

X Borg

Aug 8th 2012, 22:03

Yes, only for the 'lucky' first 300 per year.

BTW when does a year start and how would we know that 300 have been taken (or been reserved).

Advert
Advert