Advert

Mepa told of appointment of Environment Commissioner after Ombudsman had informed Falzon

Mepa had no say at all in the appointment of the Environment Commissioner and was only informed that it was being set up next week after the Ombudsman informed auditor Joe Falzon.

Addressing a media briefing this morning, Mepa chief executive Ian Stafrace took umbrage at Mr Falzon’s comments that someone from Mepa should have informed him beforehand that his office would come to an end abruptly next week.

But Mepa, Dr Stafrace said, got to know of the decision only after the Ombudsman had informed Mr Falzon – so it could not have informed him.

He noted, that athough the legal notice that set up the new office under the ombudsman was published, the old article in the planning law that set up the auditor’s office has not been repealed. This meant that the office had not yet been officially abolished.

Dr Stafrace said he was informed of the development on Thursday and he proposed to the Ombudsman a transition period during which Mr Falzon would remain in office, a proposal the ombudsman seemed to welcome. Mr Falzon also knew that some form of transition was being discussed

He said that he should be having a meeting with Mr Falzon this week.

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Victor Laiviera

Jul 30th 2012, 17:27

No, Mr Camilleri, it has been clearly stated that the Ombudsman was informed there was no agreement between the Government and the opposition.

The Ombudsman is free to make his choice - and I see no reason why he cannot choose Mr Falzon.

Joseph Camilleri

Jul 30th 2012, 22:10

@Laiviera
Really, you cannot!? I wonder why?

Mr ALBERT LEONE GANADO

Jul 30th 2012, 20:42

If MEPA got to know of the impending appointment of a new environment commissioner even later than Joe Falzon then the complete lack of transparency which characterizes our state institutions has also reached the office of the ombudsman .This should be the very institution to ensure that public appointments are fulfilled in the most transparent and consensual way to satisfy any public doubts. Ideally there should have been agreement between the two sides of parliament but in the absence of this desired resolution at the very least I would have expected the ombudsman to consult widely in particular with MEPA, the building industry, the environment NGOs and perhaps also with Joe Falzon the person with the most experience and qualifications for such an assessment. I would also have expected (unless he tried and failed) the ombudsman to take the role of mediator to try to identify a commissioner mutually agreeable to both political parties .

Charles J. Buttigieg

Jul 30th 2012, 16:14

Victor,the answer to your question is an obvious one.

Philip Hili

Jul 31st 2012, 00:23

@ Victor Laiviera

It sounds a bit fishy for insisting that this gentleman be appointed Environment Commissioner straight away!

Advert
Advert