Advert

HSBC reports €53 million profit before tax

Declares interim gross dividend of 10c per share

HSBC has reported a profit before tax of €53 million for the six months which ended June 30, an increase of €3 million, or six per cent over that in the same period last year.

The board declared an interim gross dividend of 10c per share (6.5c net of tax). This will be paid on August 22 to shareholders on the bank’s register at August 8.

The interim accounts were approved by the group’s board of directors this afternoon.

Director and chief executive Mark Watkinson said: “We have delivered another positive set of results that saw pre-tax profit increase by six per cent with a return on equity of 17.8 per cent.

The bank’s capital and liquidity position remained strong and it had a firm grip on risks and costs at a time of continuing pressure on revenue as a result of the challenges in the Eurozone.

 “Despite the difficulties in Europe we have a clear strategy focused around simplifying our business, reducing bureaucracy and improving efficiency. As part of the world’s largest international bank we are well placed to service the needs of our customers and to support the Maltese economy,” he said.

Net interest income increased by five per cent to €68 million compared with €64 million in the first half of last year. The increase reflected growth in mortgage lending and improved positioning of the balance sheet management available-for-sale portfolio.  

Net fee and commission income of €16 million for the six months ended June 30, compared with €17 million in June last year.

Growth in funds under administration and higher levels of custody fees more than off-set lower card fees following the sale of the merchant card acquiring business in December 2011, he said.

Mr Watkinson said that HSBC Life Assurance (Malta) Ltd reported a profit before tax of €7 million, compared with €13 million in the first half of 2011.

The first half of 2011 benefitted from a non-recurring gain of €7 million as a result of the refinement in the methodology used to calculate the present value of in-force long-term insurance business.

New business particularly with respect to life-insurance protection and higher investment income as a result of improved global market conditions partially offset this non-recurring gain.

A net gain of €2 million was reported on the disposal of available-for-sale securities compared to a net loss of €4 million in the comparable period in 2011.

Operating expenses at €45 million increased by €3 million six per cent, impacted by non-recurring staff cost recoveries in the first half of 2011 of €2 million, mainly relating to the release of an early voluntary retirement provision.

At a consolidated level, net impairments reduced from €4 million to €0.8 million. This was principally due to a €2 million impairment taken on Greek government bonds held by the life insurance subsidiary in its available-for-sale bond portfolio.

Following the Greek bonds restructuring programme, the life insurance subsidiary has disposed of all its Greek debt exposure and now holds no exposure to southern European government debt.

Loan impairments declined to €0.8m (five basis points of the overall loans book) against €1.8m in 2011 as the profit or loss benefitted from modest recoveries.  At a bank level, non-performing loans remained stable at five per cent of gross loans and asset quality remains good.

Net loans and advances to customers increased marginally by €20 million to €3,364 million. Mortgage market share remained stable.

The bank saw a slight softening in loan demand due to slowing economic conditions. Gross new lending to customers amounted to €274 million which reflects the bank’s continued support to the local economy.

Customer deposits rose by €257 million to €4,660 million as at June 30 reflecting an increase in corporate and institutional deposits.

The levels of retail deposits were broadly unchanged despite significant competitive pressure for deposits including from local government bond issuance.

The bank’s available-for-sale investments portfolio remains well diversified and conservative.

The bank’s liquidity position remained strong with advances to deposits ratio of 72 per cent, compared with 76 per cent at last December 31.

The bank continued to strengthen its capital ratio to 11.8 per cent. This exceeded the eight per cent minimum regulatory capital requirement. The bank intended to maintain a conservative approach to capital and would continue to build capital where appropriate.

Advert

59 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Sharon Avola

Aug 18th 2012, 15:06

I totally agree with you.

m. borg (slm)

Jul 28th 2012, 18:04

Yes but Mid-Med was government owned and all the profits went to the country's coffers while the minority shareholders got their dividends as well.

m. borg (slm)

Jul 27th 2012, 23:37

Meta ma tmurx xi fehra bhal tas-Sliema u issib kaxxier wiehed/wahda jaqdu kju daqsxhiex.

Jew jghalqu ferhat li jaqdu xi zewgt irhula sew imbasta jaqtghu l-ispejjez tal-haddiema.

Mark Mifsud

Jul 28th 2012, 01:43

Tini raguni valida ghalfejn dan m'ghandux jkun.

Brian Bonnici

Jul 27th 2012, 21:21

Francis..much more than 85 million it was sold. The difference went into the pockets of the clever ones!!

Rose Agius

Jul 27th 2012, 17:55

If HSBC are doing so well, why are they reducing staff and closing down branches? To make more millions of course and who suffers? The customers of course - but who cares? Bugibba Branch has been reduced to one cashier but HSBC doe not care that at times it takes one hour to be served on account of the many tourists who use this branch for service.

pete camilleri

Jul 27th 2012, 17:34

why is it political....profits of a bank....???????? You confuse me Mr. Botta.........

john muscat

Jul 27th 2012, 18:07

If the bank was owned by the Govt.(who are the Maltese in general) those profits would have been in our coffers, but now the govt. gets only 35% and HSBC gets 65% and goes in foreign pockets.

pete camilleri

Jul 27th 2012, 18:27

Mr. John Muscat, I beg to differ.....do you remember the BAD DEBTS Mid Med had.....?? At least the Maltese are getting 35% tax on profits & some dividends..if it was still run by the gov..mmmmmmmmmm I wonder & I do not involve politics..I NEVER DO.....!!!

mark borg

Jul 27th 2012, 20:01

x ghandu x jaqasm il profitti ta bank !!!!! int bis serjeta ???? int tahseb li id depositi tal generazzjoni tal lum qedin ??????? il generazzjoni tal lum djun sa xfar tghajnejhom ghandhom ualla hares ma jghejnuhomx il generazzjoni ta bla djun u zmien il middle class ta mintoff !!!!!

Rose Agius

Jul 27th 2012, 18:09

Why do you have to bring politics into everything - we are so childish. This only means that the rich are getting richer - does not mean that it has any reflection on the most of the Maltese who earn an average salary or are on the minimum wage. These people can hardly make ends meet with their low income let alone save and deposit thousands of euros a year. The cost of living is always going up and many of the food stuff and services are not reflected in the basket of commodities that make up COLA on which the cost of living is worked on. Which ever party is in power, prices will always go up as we depend mostly in imports.

Gianninu Saliba

Jul 27th 2012, 18:50

Rose, try and convince me that you are not socialist. If you really believe that only a few people have invested the €4,660 million with just one bank, then there is something really wrong with you. Please do not hide behind the sick excuse that the cost of living goes up irrespective of which Party is in government. When Labour was in government there were more than 20,000 unemployed (how could they make ends meet) and some other 20,000 in the Labour Corps (earning peanuts). Then again, there were never in the history of our beloved country so many, employed full time and so many others working part time. The 80,000 or so, of more people today earning an income, compared to those earning an income in the 70s and 80s are definitely better off; and that is only thanks to the various PN governments. By the way, when Labour was in government there were some 10,000 people working a three or four day week and that' was the time when people could hardly make ends meet with there low income. Not today.. I do agree with you, however, that there are those that really got rich under a PN government. A good example is a particular journalist working for the MLP who, thanks to Malta joining the EU (and that's no thanks to him) now can boast that he owns a house in Italy and at least another in Malta.

ANTHONY PAVIA

Jul 27th 2012, 17:19

A commercial enterprise without profits is like a human body without blood. Do you prefer living and kicking businesses or dead ones?

john muscat

Jul 27th 2012, 18:10

Kieku dak il-qliegh kien jibqa ghand il-gvern u kien inaqqas ftit mid-dejn.

W Cassar

Jul 27th 2012, 18:53

The thing is if they stayed under government control... they would probably be making a loss now.

Daniel Borg

Jul 27th 2012, 19:06

Ma nafx xjonqos ibieh iktar... Bix ma nsemux is sea malta wkol, limportanti li lpoplu jibqa jamel tajeb al decizjonijiet ta klikka ta nies u xibka ta hazen skond xi hadd

john muscat

Jul 27th 2012, 19:54

Kieku dak il-qliegh kien jibqa ghand il-gvern u kien inaqqas ftit mid-dejn.

mark borg

Jul 27th 2012, 20:02

sewwa qed tghid

ANTHONY PAVIA

Jul 27th 2012, 17:17

I am a client of their's and I feel I am well treated. Of course their fees could be more reasonable. Then they would be unbeatable.

Andrew Gatt

Jul 27th 2012, 16:33

This 1 thinks that the figure was actually Lm83 million = €193 million, hux?

And give me a profitable bank anytime before a bust one.

Kevin Muller

Jul 27th 2012, 18:03

@G.Vella - You are so right, but most people still believe that everything is fine with our system not realising that it's the biggest fraud ever happened.

Henry Ford said once : It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.

Who wants to understand why our world is in such a mess and what is the real reason for that, read the crash course of chris martenson - http://www.peakprosperity.com/crashcourse - You may not believe what you learn there, but it's reality!

W Cassar

Jul 27th 2012, 18:50

GO would not be losing money if it was not for a certain Greek investment!

Daniel Dimech

Jul 27th 2012, 21:12

jien nahseb l imaxxijiet tad djun mela ekonomija b sahhita xi dwejjaq ta nies

Advert
Advert