Government urged to end blanket detention policy
Malta’s policy of mandatory detention for migrants arriving by sea resulted in prolonged detention of unaccompanied children and other abuses of migrants’ rights, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.
It called on the government to end the blanket detention policy and ensure that children are not detained pending age determination.
Human Rights Watch’s new 50-page report, “Boat Ride to Detention: Adult and Child Migrants in Malta,” details treatment of migrants, typically from sub-Saharan Africa, who arrived in Malta after treacherous boat journeys across the Mediterranean, in unseaworthy boats, without enough food, water, or fuel.
Upon arrival in Malta, virtually all irregular migrants are detained – and the conditions in detention can exacerbate the trauma of the journey. The July 2012 death of Mamadou Kamara, a 32-year-old Malian migrant who was found dead inside a Maltese Detention Services van, has increased concern over the country’s treatment of migrants, it said.
“Malta’s automatic, indiscriminate, and blanket detention of migrants – including unaccompanied migrant children – is inhumane and unnecessary,” said Alice Farmer, researcher in the Children’s Rights Division at Human Rights Watch.
“It doesn’t deter migrants from coming to Malta and it violates international law.”
Since 2002, approximately 15,000 migrants have landed by boat on Malta, arriving in the country without permission, or “irregularly.”
The report documents Malta’s routine detention of unaccompanied migrant children – who are often fleeing violence or conflict in countries such as Somalia and Eritrea – pending the outcome of a lengthy age determination procedure.
Unaccompanied migrant children are children traveling without parents or other guardians; typically they travelled in dangerous conditions for many months before reaching Malta.
"If Malta determines that they are under age 18 – often only after a lengthy period in detention – they are released to group homes for children."
Among the children interviewed by Human Rights Watch, the average length of time spent in detention awaiting age determination was 3.4 months.
Most unaccompanied migrant children travelled without passports or other identifying documents, which might be impossible to obtain in their countries of origin.
The Maltese government treated unaccompanied children who lacked proof of their age as adults and detained them in adult facilities. Human Rights Watch interviewees related being detained with children as young as 12 years old.
“Malta should treat migrants who claim to be under age 18 as children until proven otherwise and never detain them,” said Ms Farmer. “The fact that unaccompanied children, who have made long and dangerous trips without their parents or other caregivers, are locked up until they can prove they are children demonstrates the brutality of the detention policy.”
Abdi M., who was 17 years old when he was detained, told Human Rights Watch: “Every day a big man from Mali came and said, ‘Give me your food.’ And one day I said no, and he hit me. I was out on the floor [unconscious] for half an hour. I told the soldiers but they said, ‘We don’t care.’ No one helped me, I just cried and went to sleep.”
Malta’s policy of prolonged detention took its toll on the mental health of adult and child migrants alike. Respected medical journals have stated that lengthy immigration detention correlates with higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression, and that detention exacerbates pre-existing symptoms, including mental trauma sustained while fleeing torture or persecution. Children and young people who are detained for extended periods of time are likely to experience feelings of isolation and detachment.
Kelile T., who reported that he was 17 years old when he arrived in Malta in 2011, was detained for nine months before he was hospitalised for 15 days for mental health treatment. After treatment, he was nonetheless returned to detention, he said. He described his experience: “I take medicine now, for sleep. No medicine, I can’t sleep … my mind is no good, it is very hard.… I can’t, I can’t ... this is a hard place. I need a free place.”
Malta justified its detention policy by referring to European Union migration policies, including the Dublin II Regulation, which obliges the country to process all asylum seekers.
Other EU states have also been slow to respond to calls by the European Commission to relocate recognized refugees from Malta to other parts of the EU; for example, in 2010-2011, only 228 migrants were relocated from Malta to other EU member states.
While EU policy together with greater flows through North Africa have undoubtedly put pressure on Malta’s migration system, the mandatory detention of irregular migrants was neither a necessary nor justified response, Human Rights Watch said.
It noted that in July 2010, the European Court of Human Rights found that Malta’s detention of migrants was arbitrary, lacking in adequate procedures to challenge detention, and in breach of its obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Malta has argued that this ruling applied only to the plaintiff in the case, Khaled Louled Massoud, an assertion rejected by the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe.
Human Rights Watch urged the Maltese government to:
- Limit detention of migrants to exceptional circumstances, with individualized determinations and access to procedures to challenge detention;
- Treat those who claim to be children as such pending the outcome of age determination proceedings, and do not detain them while their ages are assessed; and
- Bring policies on detention in line with standards articulated by the Council of Europe and provided for by the European Convention on Human Rights, namely by executing fully, effectively, and immediately the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Louled Massoud v. Malta, which found Malta’s detention of migrants arbitrary and in violation of the European Convention.
Human Rights Watch also renewed its call on the EU to reform the Dublin II Regulation to permit more equitable burden-sharing among member states.