Advert

JPO: EFA voted against party line and his own leader in 1974

MP warns he will leave the PN if this evening's meeting is 'a farce'

Updated - Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando said today that he was surprised that in last Thursday's meeting of the PN Executive, Eddie Fenech Adami did not speak against matters being escalated. In 1974, he recalled, when Parliament voted on the Republic Constitution, Dr Fenech Adami voted with Dom Mintoff and against the party line and that of his leader Dr George Borg Olivier. He did so, Dr Pullicino Orlando said, against the directives of his party.

That was far more serious than his own vote in parliament on the motion for the resignation of Mr Cachia Caruana.

Speaking in a One TV interview of some 100 minutes, Dr Pullicino Orlando said he had no regret in voting against Mr Cachia Caruana because every civil servant had to respect Parliament in everything he did.

MPs, Dr Pullicino Orlando said, served in Parliament as representatives of the people and not their party.

The PN Executive will this evening consider Dr Pullicino Orlando's call for the PN to expel Mr Cachia Caruana for allegedly having colluded with the PL between 1996-98.

Dr Pullicino Orlando reiterated his view that Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi prejudiced his case against Mr Cachia Caruana when he said on Sunday that he saw the ingredients of a frame-up. 

The Executive's meeting last Thursday, he said, should certainly not have escalated matters until it heard evidence he intends to presents today.

'CARELESS' NOTIFICATION PROCESS

Dr Pullicino Orlando criticised the PN for having been 'careless' in the late notification of witnesses he had called for tonight's meeting, noting that as a result, it appeared that European Commissioner John Dalli would not attend. He had submitted the list of witnesses on Wednesday and PN Executive president Marthese Portelli waited for six days before formally notifying them. This was, at best, carelessness, Dr Pullicino Orlando said, and it was useless trying to blame him. He hoped if was not something worse, in the same way as this case had been prejudiced, as this would be a blot on the history of the PN.

"I am not comfortable that matters are being done as they are supposed to," Dr Pullicino Orlando said. "I hope this will not be a fait accompli."

Dr Pullicino Orlando recalled that the Opposition had also called Mr Dalli to give evidence (in the House Foreign Affairs Committee) in its claims that Mr Cachia Caruana worked in the interests of foreign countries, something which he too was alleging against Mr Dalli. He suspected that today's meeting was moved to Tuesday to make it difficult for Mr Dalli to attend, in the same way as he could not attend the meeting in Parliament. Mr Dalli had told him he would do his best to attend. Mr Dalli appeared to share his view that obstructions were being made to prevent him from attending.

Mr Dalli said it was worth recalling that Mr Dalli had himself been the victim of a frame-up leading to his resignation, but at the time no one made the fuss now being raised with regard to Mr Cachia Caruana.

Dr Pullicino Orlando said he was shocked by more revelations against Mr Cachia Caruana made by the Labour media over the past days, particularly his implications on who may have been behind the attempt on his life. He said that it was those who did not bow to Mr Cachia Caruana, such as Guido de Marco, John Dalli and himself, who had been subjected to certain situation because they were not subservient to him. But, Dr Pullicino Orlando said, he had always regarded Dr Gonzi as the party leader and head of government, not Mr Cachia Caruana.

Dr Pullicino Orlando said he was not impressed by Mr Cachia Caruana's denial of the various claims made against him.

Regarding the claims made by Labour MP Karmenu Vella regarding Air Malta, Dr Pullicino Orlando said Mr Cachia Caruana was a participant in bringing Air Malta to its knees and he could not understand the spin which praised Mr Cachia Caruana after the EU agreed on the Air Malta rescue package, paid for by the Maltese people.

Dr Pullicino Orlando said he could have presented other former Labour ministers who were approached by Mr Cachia Caruana after 1996 but could not do so without their permission.

ASST COMMISSIONER'S WORDS 'MANIPULATED'

With regard to Joe Mizzi's allegations, particularly with regard to a cocaine party on a yacht, Dr Pullicino Orlando questioned how Mr Cachia Caruana waited 48 hours to launch court proceedings. He said that the comments made by then Inspector (now Assistant Commissioner) Manuel Cassar had been 'manipulated' and misinterpreted.

What Mr Cassar had said did not deny what Mr Mizzi said, but only that he went where he was asked to go. And it was Commissioner (Mr Grech) who sent him). Furthermore, one could recall the weight which a court gave to Mr Grech's testimony in the past during the hearings on the Cachia Caruana stabbing case.

The court found that the attacks against Mr Cachia Caruana had a personal motivation and one therefore had to ask how much his protection had cost the taxpayers since.

He had no doubt, Dr Pullicino Orlando said, that Mr Mizzi could substantiate his allegations, which had also been made before.

JPO WARNS HE WOULD LEAVE THE PN IF HE SEES 'A FARCE'

Asked what he expected this evening, Dr Pullicino Orlando again raised his concerns that the case was prejudiced as he had been accused of not acting in good faith and preparing a frame-up. All manner of obstructions were being put up against him, he said. He would not tolerate a situation, this evening, where everything was stage-managed. His adversary was being given an advantage, but he would still go in for the race.  

If matters were not handled correctly within the party this evening, if he witnessed a farce, he would seriously reconsider his position within the party, Dr Pullicino Orlando said.

This evening he would present an irrefutable case, backed by sworn statements, to show that Mr Cachia Caruana's influence was such that he should be dismissed from the party. He still had to see how Mr Cachia Caruana would defend himself. If Mr Cachia Caruana managed to convince him otherwise, it was all well and good.

He knew, and he had evidence, that some members of the executive agreed with him, although they had not spoken up, Dr Pullicino Orlando said.

The Nationalist MP defended his decision to go to PN headquarters on Thursday accompanied by security guards, saying that the presence of certain people outside the door justified his decision. However he had since spoken to party officials and he expected the situation this evening to be different.

Dr Pullicino Orlando expressed his regret that the PN media had carried pictures of his partner attending a Labour Party activity. He said his partner had every right to be a Labourite and the prime minister had known this from the outset. He said that after he decided not to seek re-election, his partner asked him whether it was a problem for her to attend a PL activity. He said he had not objected and only told her not to hide herself, so that no one would accuse them of hiding. After her pictures were carried on NET and In-Nazzjon, he had spoken to Dr Gonzi, who expressed his regret, Dr Pullicino Orlando said.

In the interview Dr Pullicino Orlando hit out at Richard Cachia Caruana for the way he treated other people, including respected civil servants, and said that an audio clip broadcast by One TV yesterday even showed him shifting the blame for problems faced by Eddie Fenech Adami. It was also disgraceful that, apparently, Mr Cachia Caruana had implicated Guido de Marco and Lawrence Gatt in the attempt on his life.

Dr Pullicino Orlando said Dr Gonzi and himself had mutual respect and he did not think that the current problems stemmed directly from Dr Gonzi but from the poor choices he had made, particularly in his choice of Mr Cachia Caruana.

He would go for this evening's meeting with an open mind, Dr Pullicino Orlando said, and he hoped the matter would not be treated in a frivolous manner.

 

Advert

151 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

George Cutajar

Jul 17th 2012, 13:14

@ E Gatt - You are asking a bit too much. JPOS, Debono and Mugliette have no regrets for whatever they have said or done and they still believe that they are right and that only they are right.

J Cassar

Jul 17th 2012, 13:15

All political parties have this crap going on... if you believe that the PL dont, then, all the fool you Sir... you will be let down again, and no doubt much harder... bear in mind the recession Europe finds itself in, and the above the water the Maltese people are still in!!

m. borg (slm)

Jul 17th 2012, 13:21

Adieu to government too silly boy, something gonzi is trying to avoid for some unknown personal reasons.

M Attard

Jul 17th 2012, 12:13

Prosit Mike. Good one

Joseph Bugeja

Jul 17th 2012, 11:54

You want the cake and eat it eh? Why weren't the 3 MP's suspended or is it muzzled before the parliament closed down for summer recess?
Don't bother to answer such a simple question.

M Attard

Jul 17th 2012, 12:16

Issa triduh jitlaq wara li l'ahhar elezzjoni gabar kemm felah voti

Jeremy J Camilleri

Jul 17th 2012, 14:25

lol...and we can also recall the Pn's position then..

Saviour Aquilina

Jul 17th 2012, 12:40

If you are saying regard 1974, YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG MR A BORG. That`s was other story.

R Axisa

Jul 17th 2012, 11:56

In-numri tal-labour force huma farsa shiha ghax huwa fatt maghruf li meta persuna ticcaqlaq minn impjieg ghal iehor ikun meqjus bhala mpjieg gdid, dawk impjegati bil-kuntratt - kull darba li jiggedded il-kuntratt ikun meqjus bhala impjieg gdid, ecc ecc. Rigward in-nies imsawtin, illum dan isir bil-pulit - saqsi lill-imgarrab!

Joe Vella

Jul 17th 2012, 15:47

R. Axisa lanqas taf il labour Force xi tfisser. Simply il Labour Force hija kemm hemm nies jahdmu at any given time. Issa jekk trid tghamel comparison bejn il labour force tal lum ma dik tal 1987 l'ahhar sena illi il PL kien fl'Gvern hu il figuri relevant. Il labour Force fil 1987 kienet ta madwar 80,000 illum hija madwar 150,000.

Joseph Bugeja

Jul 17th 2012, 12:05

What if free votes are given on peanuts and chick peas issues only? Oh I remember one was given on divorce but later there weren't many closed ranks were there?

Joseph Grech Attard

Jul 17th 2012, 12:10

So why was the late Dr. Gorg Borg Olivier removed from leader of the PN after a hushed, late night 'conspiracy' and EFA took his place? Democracy? Free vote? Why have most of the forerunners of that become presidents of the republic, including the self-crowning, Napoleon-like investiture of EFA?
It was the leader Dr. GBO who did what he thought better for the COUNTRY, and bowed his head and gave a free vote. What is expected now of the 3 rebels is to bow their heads for the good of the PARTY, GonziPN. That is a huge difference. The late Dr. GBO gave the MPS, a free vote; why didn't Dr. LG do the same in this case? Is it divorce which is only crucial for our country?

Tonio Farrugia

Jul 17th 2012, 11:21

@ H Stafrace

could not agree more with you!

HENRY FENECH AZZOPARDI

Jul 17th 2012, 11:25

SOUR GRAPES

Andy Farrugia

Jul 17th 2012, 11:25

Jahasra, jahasra, Privitera, xi hsara qed taghmel lil moviment tieghek! Ma tridtx titghallem; kompli ddellirja!

H. Meilak

Jul 17th 2012, 11:51

Sur Privitera, il-figura miskina li jista jaqta' bniedem ma tigix ikkalkulata minn opinjoni personali ta xi hadd. EFA kien gab l-akbar numru ta voti fl-istorja ta l-elezzjoniet f'Malta. Dom Mintoff kien igib numru gmielu ta voti ukoll, allura dawn iz-zewg politikanti tista tghid li "figura miskina" qatt ma qatghu. Issa, jien tal-parir li CNI tohorgu ghall elezzjoni li jmiss b' Eddy Privitera bhala leader jipprova johrog pajjizna mill-EU, umbaghad naraw jekk igibx voti daqs EFA. Good Luck!

George Cutajar

Jul 17th 2012, 12:07

@ Eddy Privitera - Meta xi darba il-Partit Laburista ikollu mexxej tal-istatura ta' EFA tistgha tibda titkellem biss ftakar dejjem bil-mod kif EFA rebah ir-referendum u lilkhom tas-CNI gabkhom titkellmu wahedkhom.

m. borg (slm)

Jul 17th 2012, 13:25

@ meilak

L-akbar numri ta' voti akkumulti kien gabhom Dr Alfred Sant fil-1996.

H. Meilak

Jul 17th 2012, 16:15

Sorry M. Borg, my mistake.

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 18:58

George Cutajar: EFA ghamel lil Malta kolonja tal-UE U Z-ZMIEN QED JURI MIN KELLU RAGUN !!!!

Hu pjacir li Malta qed thallas il-MIJIET TA' MILJUNI biex nghinu Banek Griegi, Irlandizi u Spanjoli s'issa ! Meta INT minghalik li se nibdew nircievu "Gratis et Amore" LM 100 miljun fis-sena !!!!

HENRY FENECH AZZOPARDI

Jul 17th 2012, 12:29

The three persons involved were voted parlamentarians for 5 years by the electorate and consequently unless they resign the party cannot expel them from the party unless they commit an action that warrants being disciplined. They have now been declared unable to contest with the party in the forthcoming elections.

The ball is now in their court. In my opinion they have three options:
1. Resign from the party and declare themselves independent.
2. Resign from Parliament and a bye election appoints next in line as a parlamentarian.
3. Cross the floor and drive the country to new electiions.
I might be wrong but which ever is considered by any of these, the three parlamentarians are doomed to any future political contestations.

Donna Parnis

Jul 17th 2012, 11:27

What is wrong is being in a relationship with the two people being from different parties, How pathetic, It would be like saying you can not be with that person because they have a different religion or are a different colour or come from a different country. Are you really listening to what you are saying. Every person on this earth have their own reasons for being with another person and LOVE has no colour. So basically if you are a Labourite you should not be allowed to have a photograph taken with a Nationalist. What a totally pathetic man you are.

HENRY FENECH AZZOPARDI

Jul 17th 2012, 11:21

Everybody has a right to his own opinion, which thanks to Dr. Eddie Fenech Adami we can go public without
the fear of being discriminated or haunted.

It is a delight to see so many different opinions and at the same time accepted by all concerned. This is all full merits to the PN under the leadership of Dr. Fenech Adami and to a certain extent also merits to Dr. Alfred Sant who cleared the MLP from past intruders.

Let us all hope that these are things of the past and we all can express our opinions in public without hesitation.

HENRY FENECH AZZOPARDI

Jul 17th 2012, 11:23

I am very sorry but you cannot even make a distinction between a free vote and a party line vote. Get your records straight or you prefer for your argument to stick to half truths.

HENRY FENECH AZZOPARDI

Jul 17th 2012, 11:32

The rest of my comments is totally irrelevant because obviously do not suit your ears.
It gives an exact comparison that even The Prime Minister and leader of The Nationalist Party has to abide by directives given by the Whip, and had there been not a free vote the Prime Minister would have had to vote against his conscience and in favour of divorce.

The problem is that you do not distinguish between a free vote and a whip directive, so obviously in your opinion JPO is correct. You have every right to think in this way if it makes you happier but the facts are totally different from you reasoning.

R Axisa

Jul 17th 2012, 10:39

U zguuuuuuuuur! Fejn taf int???

Ms Xaxa Caruana

Jul 17th 2012, 11:26

@Joe Vella

hehheeh Do you live in MaLTA???? Nuhhhhh dont think so ta.

M Saliba

Jul 17th 2012, 10:35

Meta tgħid PN qed tfisser GonziPN? ghax din hi l-egħruq tal-problema.

Clayton Borg

Jul 17th 2012, 10:37

Ma jmiskhomx sforzajtuh jibki quddiem Malta shiha halli tirbhu s-'sympathy votes'. Ipokriti.

C. Bonnici

Jul 17th 2012, 09:57

Did you say 500 points? Or 500 Eur per week?

Tonio Farrugia

Jul 17th 2012, 11:23

@ C. Bonnici

Spread (tal-Bonds) not Euros!!!!!! ........ forget politics, this is economics, and it is very serious!

Mr David Ganado

Jul 17th 2012, 09:41

So according to you, when JPO utters complete fallacies we should all applaud him in the spirit of freedom of expression....go figure...
If you read the comments properly (i.e. Understand what is written), you will note that the majority of the comments are simply refuting the history according to JPO. What happened with the vote for the republic is well documented, so for JPO to come along (on the PL media obviously) and try giving his own version of history is just too much to accept.

R. Balzan

Jul 17th 2012, 09:36

@ Henry Fenech Azzopardi - it's a perfect comparison and JPO had every right to mention it. It's a historical fact that EFA and a number of other PN parliamentarians voted against the PN's wishes in favour of the Republican constitution put forward by Dom Mintoff and the labour Party. That was an admirable move and so was JPO's in voting to remove from office RCC.

HENRY FENECH AZZOPARDI

Jul 17th 2012, 11:09

@ R. Bazan.

Your records are incorrect. the comparison made is way out of the true facts since in the case of Dr. Fenech Adami it was a free vote and no one did go against the party directives whereas JPO blatantly defied the party whip to justify his ego.

The facts cannot be twisted to justify any wrong doing by anyone. JPO has gone over the line and he has to face the music. His attitude is beyond party framing. He got away with the way he went along his personal motion on divorce but this time the strength and unity of the party has been treathened and who is not prepared to go by the party rules has to leave even if this means an early election.

The party will emerge stronger and stronger and I am convinced that even if the PN will lose the coming elections (which I doubt) in the long run it will become stronger by default of the party in Government.

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 09:32

Richard Caruana: If you had followed the interview of JPO this morning, you would not have written what you wrote !

Anthony Scicluna

Jul 17th 2012, 09:52

Eddy
Do NOT rewrite history please. Check your facts. Only 6 PN MPs abstained in 1974. The rest voted in favour of the republic. A total of 49 'ayes' in favour of the formation of a republic. EFA was in favour of the Republic

Also do you compare the formation of a republic against what is becoming blatantly obvious (even to the most hard line of Labourites) a personal grudge between the two?

Let's try and be Maltese and rational before becoming divided through partisanship. We are all Maltese and we must defend our history against people trying to rewrite facts

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 10:21

Anthony Scicluna: Where have I said that there were 4 PN MPs who did not vote for the Republican Constitution ? I was there in the House when that vote was taken and hence know that there were 6 MPs who remained seated when the vote was taken.

Anthony Scicluna

Jul 17th 2012, 11:09

so what's your point about Richard Caruana, Eddy? Isn't what he said true? Or is it dejjem kuntrarju? We're all Maltese here so I do not see why you should not point out the error by JPO simply to rock a boat. If that is the case then it is true that MLP just want to destabilise the country for the sake of it and do not have the true interest of Malta at heart

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 09:34

Hossam Helwani: the manipulation was similar to the manipulation which GonziPN is doing now to cover-up for RCC. Instead of a "frame-up" we are seeing a " cover-up " !

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 09:34

Hossam Helwani: the manipulation was similar to the manipulation which GonziPN is doing now to cover-up for RCC. Instead of a "frame-up" we are seeing a " cover-up " !

Edgar Apap

Jul 17th 2012, 09:41

Mr Hossam JPO Is Being Persecuted Because He Is Fighting For Accountability And True Democracy . As A Long Time Nationalist Supporter I Always Tried My Best To Do The Same . I Never Succeded And Was Brushed Aside Because Arrogance Have Been Supreme For Many A Year In Gonzi Pn . JPO Took On The Church , The PN And A Small Section Of The MLP In His Fight For Divorce And Won . That By Itself Is Historic And Never Been Achieved Before Not Even By The Great Dom Mintoff Himself . Now How Is That For A CV ?

JOSEPH MUSCAT

Jul 18th 2012, 19:53

@Hossan Helwani This man J.P.O. is a THORN on your back side remember he helped you win the last election with HIS crying,and all you ask for now is, VENDETTAS against him[ democrazija tal PARTIT NAZJONALISTA] Maybe your faith..

Mr David Ganado

Jul 17th 2012, 09:35

No one is worried Mr. Debattista. The inevitable will probably happen and PL will win the next election. What is annoying most Nationalists are the blatant lies and misrepresentations of JPOS.
When he voted parliament, he voted against the directives of the whip whilst when EFA voted for the Republic it was a free vote so there was no obligation on him to follow what his leader was doing.
If you cannot understand a simple parliamentary procedure you may as well stop commenting here since obviously you are simply wasting time and space.

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 10:50

David Ganado: You are just concentrating on one of so many points raised by JPo in his interview this morning. This shows that you have no counter-argument to all the other points raised by JPO about RCC !

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 09:39

Mario Micallef: Veru jew mhux veru li qal JPO, li Fenech Adami - u ohrajn- kien ivvota mal-gvern laburista u KONTRA l-pozizzjoni tal-PN u tal-Kap tal-partit, Dr. G. Borg Olivier ???????????

Mario Micallef

Jul 17th 2012, 10:19

Sur Privitera...jekk ma ghamel xejn lilek l-ewwel wiehed tak id-dritt li ssemma lehnek minghajr biza!

R. Balzan

Jul 17th 2012, 09:45

@ Rubern Hili - sewwa ghidtlu. U l-anqas se tibku lil Franco Debono u lil Mugliett. Se tibku biss it-tkaxkira nobis li hemm lesta ghalikom.

Philip Hili

Jul 17th 2012, 10:21

@ R. Balzan

Sur Balzan, kemm inti qalbek qawwija!!! Mhux bhal Laburisti affari taghhom u genwini li veru jhobbu l-Partit Laburista u ta' l- ghax dawn qeghdin jaraw hames snin ohra fil-bankijiet ta' l-oppozizzjoni b'din il-mossa!!!!!

Ma tantx qeghdin jiehdu pjacir!!!!

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 10:48

Philip Hili: Nahseb li hemm sorprizi ohra ghal-GonziPN li forsi Lawrence Gonzi qatt ma jissoponi li jistghu jigru ! U nahseb li anki dak in-nhar ikollkhom ghal x'hiex tibku !

Philip Hili

Jul 17th 2012, 15:32

Eddy Privitera:- Jaqaw ser tirrispondini u tghdli ghal Karmenu Vella baqa halqu maghluq ghal 15 il-sena shah fuq dan is-suggett?

M. Zammit

Jul 17th 2012, 09:02

Why, what are they doing to you? Do you go around with bodyguards?

John L Galea

Jul 17th 2012, 09:29

I don't go around with bodyguards because I am no threat to the PN. But ask those who are and their families too!!

Drocan Lubstuit

Jul 17th 2012, 09:49

@ M. Zammit

Ask RCC what they did to him!!!

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 10:29

M. zammit. The PN, and now GonziPn , have their own way how to get at those who critizize them. They do it when you apply for a government job. Or when you apply for a promotion. Or when you apply for social housing
etc..etc..

This is much worse than having someone come up to you and hitting you. Because being denied a job, promotion, or any other form of political discrimination, can affect your whole life ! I know, as I have suffered this kind of psychological violence and have a court document to prove it !

Joe Felice-Pace

Jul 17th 2012, 08:34

Mr Saliba, you are correct. I was present in the House reporting for The Times. What I am not sure about is whether six, and not four, abstained.

John L Galea

Jul 17th 2012, 08:45

Someone is a littlebit hot-headed and burning at the moment eeehhh Ganninu.

John L Galea

Jul 17th 2012, 08:42

EFA voted against his leader...lol...what's the difference?

Mario Camilleri

Jul 17th 2012, 09:25

Pullicino Orlando voted in against RCC's behaviour who is not en elected person and in favour of his expulsion from the party. EFA wanted to take leadership, so he did after 3 years. Isn't that selfishness???

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Jul 17th 2012, 09:44

I have never seen a man so blind as Francis Saliba MD. Who determines whether EFA acted in his personal interest or not? After all, he ended up Borg Olivier's successor! "Not saying nothing!"

Tommy Vella

Jul 17th 2012, 09:47

@Mario Camilleri

If that was selfishness, thank goodness for THAT selfishness. Without EFA leading the fight against the undemocratic dictatorial MLP(1981-1987) we would never have got to where we are, a very democratic, free, modern country enjoying its rightful place among other modern democratic free European states.

Who knows we may even have become a vassal in Europe of North Korea!

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Jul 17th 2012, 11:31

Mario, where you are is as a laughing stock of the world. Well, if that's what you mean by democracy, good on you and on EFA.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Jul 17th 2012, 11:40

@ John L Galea, Mario Camilleri, & Joseph Carmel Chetcuti.

The trouble with you is that you have succeeded to fool yourself and to swallow unquestioningly the output from the MLP propaganda lie factory in which you are very minor cogwheels.

The Nationalist Party is not a dictatorship and as long as there is no party whip members of parliament vote according to their conscience as a matter of routine.

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Jul 17th 2012, 12:29

Francis, fancy the pot calling the kettle black! You and your party should be renamed April Fool's PN.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Jul 17th 2012, 13:17

@ John L Galea, today at 08:42.

Instead of typing a lot of fullstops and a lol you should stop and ponder that when an MP votes differently from his leader he is not thereby voting against his leader as long as it is a free vote not subject to the party whip. That is the diffrence.

Mario Camilleri

Jul 17th 2012, 13:37

@Francis Saliba M.D.,

"The Nationalist Party is not a dictatorship" - Can't say you're not biased!!! On the other some humour doesn't hurt!!

On the other hand, in case you forgot, Michael Gonzi, Lawrence's brother stated on the divorce issue when he said that although he voted no in the referendum, he would be a dictator if he voted against the peoples' will.

And do you remember when PBO sent an email to Jason Micallef, by mistake? Was that democratic?
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20081215/local/borg-olivier-e-mail-sent-to-ministry-official-by-mistake.237289

Deo Catania

Jul 17th 2012, 08:33

Anthony Arpa ghandek zball ta ghax shabek in-Nazzjonalisti laqa ta' gonzipn hlief isemmu 70s u 80s ma jaghmlux, erhilha li jivvintaw xeba gideb u jdawwru l-fatti. ibda minn Giov DeMartino, staqsih jekk jinpurtahx il-prezent jew il-passat.

John L Galea

Jul 17th 2012, 08:42

@Anthony Arpa: "in nies li jinpurthom x'qed issier il lum u mhux snien snien ijlu ..." - Sa fejn jaf kulhadd il-PN u s-supporters tieghu dejjem joqghodu jduru ghal-passat u s-snin 80 u hafna bla bla bla iehor biex jippruvaw ibezzaw lin-nies mill-PL. Il-kumment tieghek juri kemm tal-PN huma nies ipokriti.

Mr Anthony Zarb

Jul 17th 2012, 08:45

dahhal id-divorzju ghall-interessi personali tieghu, kisser lil RCC ghal vendetta personali.....fejn hi l-imhabba lejn in nazzjon. Fejn ghandek gvern izomm b'maggoranza zghira u b'membru wiehed hemm cans kbir kif fil-fatt qed jigri biex membri tal-kamra jigbdu lejn xawwathom mhux lejn il pajjiz...l-agenda tal-individwu qed tirrenja mhux il gid komuni. Ma nistghux nibqghu sejrin hekk........
Hemm bzonn li dan il pajjiz jimmatura billi jaghti cans veru ghat tielet partit biex jibbilancja din il-gwerra bejn zewg partiti li ma tantx hemm x'taghzel bejnietom.....!

Giovanni Rizzo

Jul 17th 2012, 10:03

HEMM IL-BIZA TAT-TIELET PARTIT.

Tony Fenech

Jul 17th 2012, 10:33

@Mr. Anthony Zarb, int ghid:dahhal id-divorzju ghall-interessi personali tieghu. qeghdin fit 2012 u d-dinja kolla barra Il Filippini mghandomx divorzju, hu pacenzja u tinsinwax gideb ghax il-poplu vvota kontra r-rieda ta siehbek Dr.Gonzi. Dan ma kienx wahdu kellu maggoranza favur tieghu, ghamlulu min kollox biex ikasbruh, hu kull ma ghandu argument ma RCC li Dr.Gonzi diga ghamel pregudizzju, allura diga nqatet li kull ma jesepixxi RCC bhal billboards ezatt Dr.Gonzi ma jridx jisma.

Eddy Privitera

Jul 17th 2012, 10:36

Anthony zarb: Kieku ma kienx ghal-JPO, kieku saret simenterija fis-Siggiewi, thaffret barriera ta' 4 sulari quddiem il-Kon-Katidral ta' San Gwann bil-konsegwenzi katastrofici li kien isofri l wiehed mill-akbar u l-aqwa monument i li ghandna ! Kien il-biza li jitlef il-vot fil-parlament li Gonzi waqqaf dawk il-progetti !

Advert
Advert