Advert

House adjourned to October 1 - Electoral Law reforms rushed through

Updated 9.08 p.m.

The House of Representatives was this evening adjourned to October 1.

The adjournment motion was moved by Foreign Minister Tonio Borg, Leader of the House, who wished a happy summer to all MPs.

Earlier today, reforms to the Electoral Law were rushed through parliament  with approval by both sides.

The amendments started being debated late yesterday and were approved this evening.

They provide, among other things, for a rolling electoral register and voting in hospitals and homes for the elderly.

The rolling register means that all those who turn 18 up to a few days before election date will be able to vote.

The Bill was moved by Justice Minster Chris Said and was today approved on second reading, committee and third reading.

Dr Said the amendments would mean less hardship to hospital patients and residents of old people's homes and fewer logistical worries for the staff.

He said that the introduction of the rolling register would mean that the number of voters would rise by some 2,700 young people. 

Another amendment, the minister said, provided that all those registered to vote in Gozo but residing in Malta, could pick up their voting document in  Malta following a written request. This also applied for Maltese registered to vote in Malta but who ordinarily lived in Gozo.

Dr Said said the restricted area which surrounds a polling station, which currently stands at some 50 metres, would be considerably reduced unless the Electoral Commission felt that radius was justified.

Opposition spokesman for home affairs Michael Falzon said this in effect was a government living its sunset days. He agreed with the rolling register concept.

He suggested that voting in hospitals should be held on the eve of the general election, or even further in advance, although this should be discussed at committee stage. Dr Falzon also agreed with the reduction in the restricted area around polling stations. 

In committee stage, Dr Said introduced an amendment  by which voters registered as patients in St Vincent de Paule Home would vote the day before the election between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.

Dr Falzon agreed with the amendment. He requested the minister to clarify whether patients registered at the other hospitals would be given the option to vote in the said hospitals or whether they would be obliged to vote there if they decided to vote.

Dr Said said that to avoid confusion, they should vote in hospital.

The minister introduced a new clause which requires political clubs that are situated within 50 metres of a polling station to be closed.  

Dr Falzon remarked that had the amendments not be introduced in a hurry, both parties would have had been able to improve other issues such as “the ridiculous situation” where an election candidate had to declare that he did not exceed the campaign limit.

Dr Said that that while there was a need for further changes, the amendment referred to by Dr Falzon would have to be made to another ordinance.

The Bill was then given a third reading.

Advert

31 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Carmel Garcia

Jul 11th 2012, 07:09

Jekk ma tafx Sur Marks, il-Ministri ma jieqfux fis-sajf, imma jibqu ghaddejjin. Kull ma jieqaf biss huma d-dibattiti parlamentari.

Julian Borg

Jul 11th 2012, 07:40

All parliamentarians - MLP and PN take a break from parliament - the difference is that the Ministers still have Ministries to administer and whilst they take time off for a holiday like everyone else they still carry out their full-time Ministerial jobs during the day - it is their part-time work in the evening that is in recess. But I guess this is too difficult to comprehend for those hell bent on spinning everything against the government!

D Borg

Jul 10th 2012, 20:53

Well said Ramon

The Galdes Commission nearly 20 years ago had recommended that an electoral threshold of 5%, which was also practically upheld by the subsequent Commission headed by the same Gonzi.

Nonetheless, the duopoly of the PNPL deem that it is not in the national (sic) interest to have another party apart from themselves represented in parliament. Thus they want to continue to call the shots themselves and regulate themselves - you know within the politicans' family - where the blues and the reds scratch each other's back.

The PN also has the cheek to utter the 'wasted vote' blasphemy - to entice anyone against voting AD.
In other words, pointing out that they did everything possible to deter people from voting AD (or any third party) - and to hell with democratic rights and proportional representation.

The fact that Gonzi became Prime Minister with a PN cabinet, simply thanks to a thousand votes, whereas AD was again denied representation in parliament notwithstanding it got much more votes - shows what a hollow democracy EU Malta is still plagued with!


Antoine Vella

Jul 10th 2012, 21:27

I agree that the present rules are disadvantageous to AD but it's slightly paranoid to say that theyt were made "explicitly" against AD. We've had the same laws decades before AD even existed.

Jessica Smith

Jul 10th 2012, 23:29

Ramon Casha AD is Always Delayed as someone a long time ago had said. You can forget that you will ever have an MP.

Ramon Casha

Jul 11th 2012, 06:12

@Antoine Vella: No, the laws were created/amended recently, raising the electoral threshold higher to ensure they could not get a seat in parliament.

Colin Camilleri

Jul 11th 2012, 07:50

@Antoine, you may be right that this were made explicitly for AD. But AD may also be right in stating that this was explicitly done to undermine young/new parties. With the 5% threshold - which I personally consider too high, given the difference between the two political parties and even more the fact that the current administration does not enjoy absolute majority - it basically "scared" most floating and unsure voters in voting for AD in convincing them that a vote for AD or any other alternative party is a wasted vote unless the threshold of 5% is reached. Again, in Maltese political scenarios, 5% is simply too much.

Advert
Advert