When the soup hits the fan
In his Pulitzer Prize-winning book, American Pastoral, Philip Roth had written that, in the American corporate world, only two qualities were necessary: a perpetual smile and unremitting energy. Our Prime Minister would fit perfectly in that environment as he is always smiling – even when he has nothing to smile about – and, of late, seems to be omnipresent round the clock, exhibiting vitality and showing us that his survival skills are quite something. Bless him.
But are these qualities enough to make good politics and run a country well? Not quite.
The Prime Minister has a smile but he lacks a plan. No, sorry, he has one plan: for GonziPN to stay in government at all costs. Since the last election, we’ve had vacuous slogans such as Flimkien Kollox Possibbli (united, there’s nothing we can’t do), Par Idejn Sodi (a pair of steady hands)... which have resulted in just the opposite of what was promised.
The government losing two parliamentary votes in sequence marked a seismic political moment. Some say, a point of no return. But GonziPN continues to ignore public outrage.
The speeches in Parliament by the dissenting government members of Parliament provided the metaphorical tin opener that opened the can of worms of how the Nationalist Party works behind the scenes. We can understand better now how, in the last election, the government held on to power by the skin of its teeth. The deals, the conspiracies, the scheming that went on. Flimkien kollox possibbli indeed. For their own, though.
It is being confirmed to us with hard evidence now that when the intention is government at all costs, nothing and no one is spared. What a shame that it is the people – including those who were gullible enough to believe the lies and the mises en scène and voted PN in the last minute - who are paying the price.
While the soup hits the fan – in the form of the messy consequences brought about by the secret GonziPN deals becoming public – many families feel that priorities are being ignored by the government while they continue labouring to make ends meet.
If lessons are to be learnt it is about how far the PN is ready to go in the deceit department when it comes to winning elections. Far too many personal interests at stake and, thus, the ruthless struggle for power as an end in itself, as opposed to as a means to the end of improving the ordinary people’s lot.
As things unfold, one can then understand better why some ministers are more equal than others. Why some were dismissed by a mere cellphone text message, while others had their position strengthened in spite of their performance.
Things become clearer when seeing the high-handed manner in which Lawrence Gonzi has dealt with various people on his side of the political divide, be they contenders for the leadership (remember the friendly race?), Cabinet ministers, MPs... The chickens are eventually coming home to roost.
It is also not so hard to understand why Minister Austin Gatt, for instance, in spite of all that was/is wrong under his watch – the situation at Enemalta, the BWSC contract, the job promises of SmartCity, public transport, roads – surfs from one malfunction to the other and remains with his head above the water. This, while others around him sink or, rather, are pushed under water and stronger ones are given a life-vest.
I wrote elsewhere about two worlds: one inhabited by the Prime Minister and his buoyant Cabinet, where faithful reporters on the various media tell us their stories through rose-tinted glasses, and the other world, where the rest of us live. Now, after four years living in this other rosy world, the Prime Minister wants to visit us in our kitchens to listen to what’s wrong in our world.
GonziPN is now in overdrive trying to win those it neglected for four years. So, in these last months, those whose raison d’etre in party and government has been their own interests are now coming out with “my choice”, “my voice”, “Prime Minister for a day”, e-cards, canvass for us... and every other existing marketing ploy. Sigh. Will this make up for the fact that the Prime Minister ignores those who disagree with him? Take, for instance, how he voted against the people’s will on the divorce law.
Or for the fact that the Prime Minister is ridiculing the House of Representatives? We’ve seen this after two opposition motions were carried by Parliament and, as a result, he resorted to sarcastically referring to “il-Parlament bravu”.
Or for the long list of inefficiencies, u-turns and hardships inflicted on many by GonziPN?
We shall see.
But what will happen in the meantime? Expect more fabricated sleaze from the Nationalist Party-government tandem to counter all of the above by means of their well-orchestrated endeavours on the various media in the coming months.
A case in point is the well-coordinated onslaught – from Facebook to television news - on Labour MPs on the topic of illegal immigration... and this is only the beginning.
We now have concrete evidence – as revealed in Parliament – of how these no holds barred attacks on Labour are organised by all those who have a personal interest in keeping Labour out of government.
This, in spite of how much those involved have been detaching themselves and denying this truth over the years.
Dr Dalli is shadow minister for the public service and gender equality.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
G Borg
Jul 10th 2012, 10:40
My Dear Gerry, it seems that the article hit you very badly, perhaps because of its truths. Everybody in his sane mind do admit that the current state of affairs are not doing any good to the country and a decision, hard as it can be, needs to be taken.
I am sure that the PL will forward their plans at the right moment, and then and only then can we actually evaluate.
Re my dear Edward, do not blame her for being polite, because if she wrote the actual accepted expression, then I will certainly be surprised . Speaking about " political" major hernias, I think the PN has a lot of them and it may be the case that they were given either a 2013 or 2014 appointment to carry out surgery on these "political" hernias, if Mater Dei actually cater for these kind of operations. If they want a quick job, then they have to go to a private hospital and pay good money like the helpless citizen has to do.
Perhaps there will come a time when government do care again for its citizens.
Gerry Cowie
Jul 9th 2012, 19:27
This is the personal opinion of an MP from MUSCATPL.
She clearly did not listen to Dr Gonzi's speech in the first quarter of this year when he specifically said there is no such thing as GpnziPN.
It is typical of an opposition MP to try to find fault with the party in power which they would like to replace. However with no meaninful plans themselves the PL is reduced to digging around in the dirt for tidbits to throw into the arena.
Edward Mallia
Jul 9th 2012, 13:02
No one in his right senses would throw "soup" on any fan. The accepted expression - impolite though it may be is- when the shit hits the fan. That apart, there some dubious statements in the description of "the soup". After "it is being confirmed to us with hard evidence... etc", Ms. Dalli goes on to cry "shame that it is the people.... who are paying the price". But I reckon it equally shameful that "this hard evidence" from which the PL is drawing maximum profit now, came from the very fabricator of "the lies and the mises en scene". As indeed did the vote that tipped the balance in favour of the PL motion. A little less strident crowing on this point from the PL would be in order. Not having any sense of shame is not exactly a desireable quality in politicians, or anybody else for that matter.
Ms. Dalli again points to that cardinal sin of "the Prime Minister [voting] against the people's will on the divorce law". But does she then hold that the representatives people elect to Parliament can only act as zombies, at the beck and call of their electors? If she does, can she tell us why PL MP's in the three constituencies of Gozo, "Attard" and "Siggiewi" still voted for divorce legislation when their constituents voted against? The trouble with Dr. Gonzi's handling of the divorce issue was that he thought he could evade his primary responsibility -- which was to debate the PMB in Parliament and have a vote on it. That way even the PL would have to admit that he would have been free to vote as he thought fit. But it was not the PL Dr. Gonzi was afraid of, but PN voters. So he thought to have e referendum first. That did not go his way - certainly not in his constituencies. So he had to vote according to his conscience - as he had every right to do- but did not have enough courage to refuse to give a sop to Cerberus, his "liberal" (sic) electorate. To these he had to point out that he had only voted "No" when he was quite sure the "Yes" would have it. The result: a severe case of political hernia. To be fair, those on the PN side who changed from 'no' to the referendum wording to 'yes' in the vote in Parliament, also suffered minor hernias.
m. borg (slm)
Jul 10th 2012, 17:35
Wrong...........the divorce issue went to referendum because gonzi was afraid to take it directly to parliament and thought that the refererndum would result in a NO result.
Look at the amount of money and energy that was pumped into the NO campaign. Gonzi simply played a losing hand all along.
Victor Laiviera
Jul 11th 2012, 10:11
Dr Dalli may be forgiven for using the less popular "soup" instead of the more widely used "s**t" metaphor - the media scene in Malta being what it is, we would surely have seen a spate of pious, hypocritical pundits pretending to be shocked and horrified that the "ħamalli Laburisti" would use words like that. However, one metaphor is as valid as the next - and as valid as others. "Eggs", "pie" and "stuff" have all been used in this context. In the age of The Great Google, this is easy enough to verify.
Mr Mallia returns to Lawrence Gonzi's vote on the divorce bill and again tries to justify this ant-democratic position. Once again I have to rebut it.
The people elect representative who are - surprise, surprise! - expected to represent their views and wishes, not do their thinking for them. In practice, it is never easy to determine the people’s collective will on any given issue at a particular point in time. So MPs assume that, in following the party-line, they are fulfilling their electorate’s wishes. On the rare occasions when the people’s collective will is clear, every MP has an absolute and sacrosanct obligation to abide by that will. If his or her “conscience" does not allow it, he or she has to recognise they are not the right person to represent the people and make way for somebody else. If, that is, the notion of democracy to have real meaning and not just empty promises.
In the case of the divorce bill, Lawrence Gonzo decided to waive his right to decide and went to the people instead, asking THEM to decide for him. Once he did that, he also gave up his right to vote according to "conscience" in parliament.
The analogy about ‘Siggiewi, Attard and Gozo’ is also false, as there is a fundamental difference between and election (which returns a number of deputies from each district) and a referendum which delivers a unified result representing the people’s collective will.
Francis Sammut
Jul 9th 2012, 12:08
'A perpetual smile, did you say?' Did you watch the PM getting into a tantrum; all red-faced with anger, whenever in Parliament and elsewhere, he was asked about the hefty pay increase he gave himself and his Cabinet? I didn't notice any smiles then! And yes, now we got to know, Mr. R. C. Caruana, got the 500 euros weekly increase, also!
Please choose the reason of your report below: