Main causes of political apathy
During my political activities I meet many people and I have been struck by the apathy displayed by a substantial number of them towards Maltese politics.
One regularly hears cynical comments about politicians and remarks that manifest the disillusionment of many people with the state Maltese politics is in today. I will never forget how, last winter, when I was campaigning for the local council elections at Balzan, an old man told me and another Labour candidate to get lost because anybody who presented him/herself as a candidate for any election, whether for the local council, Parliament or the European Parliament, must necessarily be doing so for self-interest only. A nonsensical argument, in my opinion, but convincing enough for this old man to throw us out and shut the door in our faces!
What really worries me is that even several of our youths shun Maltese politics because they feel that there is a great difference between their idealistic view of what politics should be about and the stark and depressing reality of what it actually translates into in practice.
What has led to such a situation and what can we do about it?
One of the greatest culprits is the media. In my opinion, here in Malta we have too much of a slant towards the negative in many media productions. While we must not exaggerate and paint everything black, one has to admit that, with few exceptions, what we read, see and hear usually results in a totally negative experience.
What does the media present to us on a daily basis? Mostly sensational stories about the failures of politicians, alleged scandals, political intrigues and manoeuvres, etc. Yes, there are some notable exceptions, such as objective and well-researched newspaper articles, balanced television and radio political discussions, but these are a drop in the ocean compared to the amount of negative mediocrity disseminated.
Maltese politics has also been dealt a big blow by the recent decline in values in this sphere of public life. It started with the many scandals associated with local councils and it reached its apex with the Franco Debono saga.
Many people are today asking: “Whatever happened to the concept of public office as service to the community?” and “Is loyalty to one’s political party and one’s political leader a thing of the past?”
Add to all this, the ever-present back-stabbing between rival candidates and it is no wonder that many people today have a rather cynical perception of Maltese politics and politicians.
One of the most pernicious realities of politics in Malta is the way some people ingratiate themselves with the political parties and their candidates to further their own narrow self-interest. Many times, one meets people who state that they are supporting a particular candidate so that s/he will “remember” them when elected to power!
Those of us who are involved in public life because we feel that we have something to contribute to the community cannot tolerate persons who get involved in politics simply to see what they can get out of it for themselves alone.
It is really reprehensible to hear some people boast that they are actively canvassing so and so because, if elected, s/he will provide them with adequate recompense for their efforts like, say, a good job in the public service, a promotion, a lucrative contract etc. Such pseudo-canvassers have reduced politics to a marketplace where one provides a service in return for satisfactory compensation.
Unfortunately, this condemnable approach to politics is also having repercussions on the way people vote. How many people consider the national interest when voting? How many consider environmental issues, educational ones, for instance?
Let’s be honest with ourselves, a substantial number of voters will consider how a particular political party’s proposals will probably affect their pockets, first and foremost, when deciding on which political party will get their vote. I have lost count of the number of times I have heard people stating that they will vote for a particular political party only if they get what they want.
Yes, I know that I have been rather negative in my analysis but this is the truth and it stares us in our faces. So what can we do about it?
First of all, examine what a political party stands for before giving it your confidence. Secondly, look closely at the quality of the candidates in an election. What are their values? Can they be trusted? What is their track record? By what kind of people are they surrounded?
On their part, political parties should ensure that their candidates see public office as a service to the community and that they treasure the value of loyalty to one’s leader, to one’s colleagues and to the electorate.
Yes, it is difficult to be an idealist and a successful politician. However, politics as a service to Malta and the Maltese remains the noble goal we have to strive to reach.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Scerri
Jul 7th 2012, 16:34
Instead of blaming the media and the voters which I consider an extremely arrogant way of trying to cover up for the gross incompetence of our politicians it would have been better to see what’s wrong with the politicians themselves.
Peter Xuereb
Jul 7th 2012, 16:07
Unfortunately the old man is right: Maltese politics deserves the apathy is gets. It suffers from the bipartisan circus, from the ineffective way it is conducted and a very weak connection between government and people. There needs to be radical change for the better if Maltese politics is not to suffer the imminent apathy that other countries have already suffered and currently dealing with seriously. In Malta on the other hand, we only act when we HAVE to not when we need to: hence why we are in this political mess int he first place.
Mr ALBERT LEONE GANADO
Jul 6th 2012, 22:31
Rather than just promoting the negative I feel that the media in an age of consumerism want sensational news to feed their readers and which impacts and attracts the momentaryattention of the public as a topic of talk for the day. How can one explain otherwise the way that the three PN mavericks have hogged the spotlight in our media often with their inane remarks for no less than six months whilst major economic issues which affect our future are relegated to the background. Political Ideology and its fundamental principles and beliefs have effectively secondary issues with the consequence that one in effect cannot distinguish between what the parties stand for other that they are grouping who have got together to win power. Politics has been debased with no fundamental loyalties and this not only in Malta but in most Western democracies . Elections have become a consumer product to select and a game to watch just as any other consumer product where image is more important than substance. If we reflect that the American presidential candidates have to raise at least 100 million dollars a month to oil the wheels of the presidential race , party financing has become a crucial element of success and thus parties and candidates need the support of powerfui sponsors often commercial organisations and who view funding as a way of guaranteeing the promotion of their future interests. However let us not lose hope and as true positive political animals keep plugging political principles and beliefs against just projecting image. History has shown that eventually true political dialectic and confrontation of political ideals and models will reassert themselves as the basis of true political movements..
Francis Sammut
Jul 6th 2012, 21:41
The author have been struck by apathy and disillusionment! I say, look around you sir, what do you see? What do you expect, being met with bouquets of flowers? We used to say politics is dirty. Now we need to find another word!
Joseph E Briffa
Jul 6th 2012, 12:51
The author undoubtedly makes a number of valid points; indeed most of them are perfectly obvious, like the track record of a party and particularly the kind of people they are surrounded by. The two points are actually synonymous. A party is made up of individuals, they make up the party rather than the name, or flag, or the colour of their ties, or the background colour of their posters. It is very easy for one to change these things to project a more innocuous image. It is however another matter to change the image of the people that make up the party.To come to the point: Alfred Sant did not feel the need to change the party's emblem, or the name of the party, it didn't matter to him whether he or the people surrounding him wore red or blue ties, or grey ones for that matter; he did not feel the need to eschew all shades of red from the foregrounds or the backgrounds of the party posters. This need was not felt simply because he had cleansed the party from its violent and diehard elements. On the other hand, when JM took over the leadership, all the diehard members of the Mintoff cabinet and a number of diehard party activists of those times were taken again on board, and this after Alfred Sant had sidelined them. Unlike party names, emblems, and background colours, people don't change and when they do, they change for the worse; very few are the ones who mellow as they get older. Indeed the author has a point.
ANTHONY PAVIA
Jul 6th 2012, 10:34
If you are seeking to fix what is broken, then how about starting from political candidates themselves? If you want to apportion blame for the current (last 35 years) impasse, then the whole hog should be shared amongst all the participants (especially the ones in power) active within the political class itself!
Fleur Mifsud
Jul 6th 2012, 09:41
A great article, prosit!
Please choose the reason of your report below: