Advert

Shares in City Gate project on offer from Monday week

The new Parliament House takes shape

The new Parliament House takes shape

20 million shares in Malita Investments, the Special Purpose Vehicle which will fund the Valletta City Gate/Parliament project, will go on sale on July 23.

Company chairman Kenneth Farrugia said another 10 million shares will be available in case of over-subscription.

The shares will be offered at 50c each. They will be listed on the stock exchange from August 16.

Speaking at a press conference this afternoon, Mr Farrugia explained that Malita is a fully-owned government entity where the government cannot have less than 70% shareholding.

He said the company's purpose is to acquire and manage a portfolio of immovable assets of strategic national importance, of which the City Gate project is the first.

The company directors are Vincent Mifsud, Frederick Mifsud Bonnici, Danny Rosso and Ann-Marie Tabone.

Mr Farrugia said the government had so far bought 50 million shares through a direct investment of €25 million and 68 million shares in return for the transfer of direct ownership of MIA (valued at €21.5m) and Valletta Cruise Port (€12.5m)

Malita will use its revenue to fund the €82m City Gate project. It will also pay the government a groundrent of €100,000 a year.

The government and Malita have already signed an agreement for the government to lease the Parliament Building for 20 years and the open air theatre (30 years) for a total of €5.2m per annum.

Mr Farrugia said the €82m funding the City Gate project would come from the direct government funding of €25m, a €40m loan which Malita has taken from the European Investment Bank (at interest of between 3.1% and 3.45%), the revenue from the public shares (€9.3m) and from a stand-by facility of €4.56 million from of the banks, as well as the leases from MIA and Valletta Cruise Port.

He said the government has waived its right to a dividend until the end of 2014.

For the private investors, the board’s intention is to give shareholders a gross annual yield of 7 per cent of the issue price.

Advert

96 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

VINCENT WILLIAMS

Jul 5th 2012, 17:43

Without any doubt you have not lived in the 1970's. When the PN Opposition was really the 'NO Party' for every law that the Labour Government passed through Parliament the PN Opposition always voted against. Also the PN was already the 'Grumblers Party.'

By the way the PN now turn into GONZI PARTIT NEGATTIV !!!!!!!

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Jul 5th 2012, 17:48

I donl't suggest you do that. Join me in investing in shares in the gate instead.

Joe Tabone

Jul 4th 2012, 23:11

m borg,
Why should Labour not move parliament to the new building IF they win the next election?
Does this mean that the new Labour government, will not covert The Palace to a cultural centre ( a major tourist attraction) and place the Armoury in it original place? Why?

Richard Caruana

Jul 5th 2012, 06:54

We'll have two roofed theatres, one in the Palace and one in the new building.

Go on, be realistic. You really think a Labour govt won't use the new Parliament building? It's all hot air.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Jul 5th 2012, 17:51

I donl;t know why you ask this question when Joe Muscat said he would that, if he became Pm before the building was finished, he would do the courtesy of allowing Dr Gonzi to open formally the new parliament.

ANTHONY PAVIA

Jul 4th 2012, 19:48

That is the trick, isn't it? However, for a Government to offer a coupon on preferred stock/debentures @ such a rate, that is close to what Spain and Italy are offering currently, somehow does not create a very good impression of the Maltese Government financial situation, doesn't it?

David Farrugia

Jul 4th 2012, 20:42

feel free to buy as much shares as you want. Just look at the share price history of GO, MIA, BOV, HSBC, MIDI etc....

I'm investing my hard earned cash elsewhere.

D Borg

Jul 4th 2012, 21:49

my reading is gross yield of 7% of the share price (0.50)

thus the envisaged yield is just 3.5%....

Eddy Privitera

Jul 5th 2012, 08:43

Paul@Micallef: So I assume, that if the dividend offered was 10% or even 15%, you would consider that as a SUPER-SUPER INVESTMENT, wouldn't you ??????????????

Paul@ Micallef

Jul 5th 2012, 09:13

@ Eddie Privitera. Of course. My comment is purely from an investment point of view. Politically and economically for the country that is a different matter and I do not agree with it at all. Anthony Pavia is right.
@ David Farrugia. You are absolutely 100% right when stating that the share price of all maltese companies mentioned by you lost a lot of ground. The only difference is that none of them are guaranteeing an annual dividend of 7%.

Alex Mifsud

Jul 5th 2012, 06:50

Good suggestion

Alfred Cassar

Jul 4th 2012, 20:25




B I G G E S T - B A R U M B A R A


m. borg (slm)

Jul 4th 2012, 19:28

How many shares you intend to buy Mr Tonna?

Joseph Camilleri

Jul 4th 2012, 19:55

Hallijhom jeqirdu sur Tonna lil dawn il lejburisti... as I already said, these people have been having it too good for too long. Time to taste hard-ships now.

David Farrugia

Jul 4th 2012, 20:45

I notice a few people that are promoting these share here. And with all the pomp of a North Korean style propaganda. Bet my other 'sound' investments that these are government ppl.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Jul 5th 2012, 17:54

This 'G. Tonna' sounds like he has sent his message from PN party headquarters. Perhaops G. Tonna should advise the NP to invest in shares in this propject.

martin said

Jul 4th 2012, 19:05

With all due respect looks like a block of flats to me!

m. borg (slm)

Jul 4th 2012, 19:29

I bet you are studying art.

Joseph Camilleri

Jul 4th 2012, 18:24

Say's you Mr. Red Eye! ...it's called progress, apart from that, it looks clear that you have never been to places such as big european cities where buildings are like nothing on earth!

This is good taste, with modernity, blended with the past.

GET USED TO IT DUDE!

A Dimech

Jul 4th 2012, 18:33

It is all a big financial plot with the ultimate goal of "hiding" governmental debt and put it on a fictitious company owned by the government and a few investors who lended the government some money for 7% interests - ultimately in substance it is as if the government took a loan....

but they cnanot do so, otherwise the debt will continue to spiral out of control!!
so they are calling it a company!

m. borg (slm)

Jul 4th 2012, 19:30

It is called redirecting money.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Jul 5th 2012, 17:57

Sur Camilleri, ovvja li ma kellekx ripsota ekonomika ghad-domanda ta' Silvio Abela. U int kemm ser tinvesti f' il-progett tant ghal qalbek. Ghidilna.

J. Debono

Jul 4th 2012, 18:33

Due to the fact that this project was done under the PN, even if it was made out of solid gold, it would still be an eyesore for the likes of you.

For myself, though I am totally against a roofless theatre, I will hold judgement when I see the finished project.

m. borg (slm)

Jul 4th 2012, 19:33

Mr Debono just because it was designed by Piano it does not mean that it is neccessarily a work of art.

Great artist have been known to make artistic mistakes so Renzo Piano is no exception, He had already proposed something similar in the 90'sa to Eddy's government but it was refused.

This only means that either Eddy or Gonzi have no artistic taste.

William Caligari

Jul 5th 2012, 09:52

Hear, hear Dr.j brincat.

N Azzopardi

Jul 4th 2012, 19:11

Talk after the shares are sold. You bet there will be an over subscription of over €10m. Since when you can give advices on what to invest, bait and what have you. You spent many years of your life in the casino and there were it ended. No progress at all. If I were you, do not post any comments in areas you do not know anything about. Although the PL and people like you are always saying that there are grave problems, poverty etc. The shares will be sold out minutes after they are listed. GRAVE PROBLEMS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P. Zammit

Jul 4th 2012, 18:04

Island Hotels, Corinthia , Melita PLC, Farsons ....etc are these dubious / doomed companies ??

Paul Cassar

Jul 4th 2012, 18:16

DEAR P....................NOT TODAY .....................NOT GOVTS.....................think

ANTHONY PAVIA

Jul 4th 2012, 18:43

P Zammit, Yes private companies that have however jumped at the opportunity to reduce their interest commitment to today's levels on rolling over expiring debt instruments. And they have done what would have been expected of them. However, you must have heard of large foreign companies that have gone bust, haven't you? Well the possibility of the Maltese Government doing just that is remote, isn't it? More sense, less politics please.

A Dimech

Jul 4th 2012, 18:30

It can guarantee because it is government owned.

That is why all this is a big scam. in substance this is the government borrowing money at 7% interest - and in doing so some very high paid directors are getting loads of money for "pretending" that this is a company!!!

ANTHONY PAVIA

Jul 4th 2012, 18:37

Would you repeat that ever so slowly so some others will understand it.

Alfred Cassar

Jul 4th 2012, 20:14

WOW

Karl Farrugia

Jul 4th 2012, 22:47

Get the facts straight first before pushing pen to paper......let me paraphrase....hopefully I can make myself understood.........its mine.(Government)...I rent it to you for 65 years...you pay me 100,000 pa ground rent....you finance the building for euro 82 million.....and rent it to me..........after sixty five years I get the property back....free...this is called financial engineering...hope its clearer....ps I save the opportunity of funding the development at 82 million today to deploy capital in other projects.

Lena Hahn

Jul 4th 2012, 19:30

"heart wrenching". Couldn't have put it better myself.

Mr Joe Micallef

Jul 4th 2012, 17:35

WOW you really don't understand the difference between money borrowed by governments and money borrowed by revenue generating companies! That says so much about you!

Eddy Privitera

Jul 4th 2012, 18:18

"Revenue generating companies " ? Explain how will parliament generate revenue. Oh yes ! The government, who owns the land will be paying the company €5.2 million over 30 years, after having given up the rent it receives from MIA and the Valletta Cruise Port ! Just confirming that we are paying very good money,- not peanuts - and still got monkeys running our country !

A Dimech

Jul 4th 2012, 18:27

Joe Micallef - sorry you don't understand not me. If you look at the substance of the deal (the the form) - essentially this is another method of borrow used by the government - only it is now paying 7% interest!!!

ANTHONY PAVIA

Jul 4th 2012, 18:36

Mr Micallef, Your comment exposes your ideas to having suffered from a radiation of dangerously blue-hue rays, to such an extent that you are oblivious to all else.

Mr Joe Micallef

Jul 4th 2012, 18:56

It's not just the parliament that generates revenue - in reality for that real estate that is really nothing. Radioactive peanuts – dangerous stuff!

Mr Joe Micallef

Jul 4th 2012, 19:43

Dimech you are abosulutely wrong on the 7%! Your's is a very superficial analysis - properly used SPVs are a sound financial instrument to finance projects.

ANTHONY PAVIA

Jul 4th 2012, 19:43

Yeah! Another "Money no problem" bravu.

A Dimech

Jul 4th 2012, 21:20

Mr M Micallef -

what are you talking about?

"Dimech you are abosulutely wrong on the 7%! Your's is a very superficial analysis - properly used SPVs are a sound financial instrument to finance projects. "

Let me explain - ultimately all the assets in the new SPVs are public owned. Now the simplest way for the government was to borrow some money at say 5% and build the pigeon holes like that. (by the way, government can probably borrow at a rate less than 5%!)

But if the government did this, it would have shown debt on its books. SO to avoid this it entered into complicated arrangement to create SPV and transfer the monies from the airport rent to this SPV. It is also issuing some shares to make it seem it is a proper SPV. The cost of all this - loads of directos wages, paying a dividend 7% (at least 2 to 3% over the interest rate); and guess where this money is all ultimately coming?!! THE MALTESE TAXPAYER!!!

Mr Joe Micallef

Jul 5th 2012, 08:13

Pavia, Money or Debts are only a problem for the coward (who is usually pre-emptively violent), stale and lazy people.

You see public debt is like private mortgage. Well planned and spent gives one the opportunity for improvement, granted that one has courage, is not stale or lazy. Take your heroes - they boasted of the consolidated fund at the expense of jobs, freedom, justice, education, IT, proper health, basic infrastructure, water and electricity supplies and many others including the suspension of the constitutional courts.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Jul 5th 2012, 18:02

Lest hu, is-Sur Micallef, any criticism means stamps you as labourite. How sick!

H. Psaila

Jul 4th 2012, 17:56

At least it is better off than Belt il-Hazna, Belt is-Sebh, i think you labourites are only jealous and nothing else. You cannot find anything to grumble and moan about. You are such a moaner Mr. Laiviera.

Eddy Privitera

Jul 4th 2012, 18:11

H.Psaila: What is there to be envious about ? Seeing 3 projects which only GonziPN's clique has wanted, just to have the name "PIANO " ?? And seeing taxpayers money being wasted in such an irresponsible way ??

H. Psaila

Jul 4th 2012, 18:22

@ E. Privitera - it was the same with Mater Dei, the new Power Station, the airport terminal and so many other buildings. You always found something to grumble about such projects. Well you said irresponsible ways, well you forgot Dicembru 13 at Marsa, a road which cost LM3 million in those days, a road from Marsa to Marsa, do you call that responsible way, Izra u Rabbi, Il-Pijunieri, Dirghajn il-Maltin. Do you call them responsible ways to eliminate unemployment?

Advert
Advert