Inquiry into migrant death must be open, NGOs insist
Malian Mamadou Kamara, who died on Saturday.
A group of 10 human rights-related NGOs have insisted the inquiry into the death of Malian migrant Mamadou Kamara should be completely transparent.
In a statement issued yesterday, the group drew parallels between Mr Kamara’s death and that of Nigerian Ifeanye Nwokoye in April 2011.
Mr Kamara, whose name in court documents appeared as Muhammed Abdalla, died in the early hours of Saturday morning while in official custody. Two soldiers have been charged with his murder, and another accused of tampering with evidence. All three denied the charges.
Mr Nwokoye died while also in the custody of detention officials. An inquiry report into his death was never made public, with the government only publishing a summary of its findings.
The summary found that procedures had not been correctly agreed and that grounds existed for disciplinary action to be taken against some detention officials.
It had called for officials to receive special training in handling complex situations and for greater use of CCTV and handheld video cameras within detention centres.
“We are not aware whether the findings and recommendations were actually ever implemented,” the NGOs noted.
The government last night said it had appointed Judge Jeffrey Valenzia to head the inquiry into Mr Kamara’s death. He has been asked to investigate whether there was negligence, non-observance of procedure or abuse of power.
Judge Valenzia will also look into whether the recommendations made by the Nwokoye inquiry were taken up, and to what extent.
He will scrutinise related aspects of both cases, the organisational structure of detention centres and what procedures are followed, the government said in its statement.
It also invited the 10 NGOs to a meeting with the Prime Minister today: Aditus Foundation, Jesuit Refugee Service (Malta), SOS Malta, Integra Foundation, Migrants Network for Equality, Emigrants’ Commission, Get Up Stand Up, Organisation for Friendship in Diversity, Kopin, and the Foundation for Shelter and Support to Migrants.
Jesuit Refugee Service director Katrine Camilleri said Mr Kamara’s death was further proof that “Malta’s initial reception system has repeatedly failed and that the costs of a mandatory detention policy far outweigh its potential benefits”.
Asylum seekers arriving in Malta are automatically placed in detention centres for up to 18 months while their application for asylum is processed.
The 10 NGOs called for a comprehensive review of this policy as well as for the government to bolster the Detention Visitors Board – the body responsible for monitoring detention conditions – and make its recommendations binding on the Commander of the Detention Service.
Echoing the NGOs’ call, refugee agency UNHCR said Malta’s reception system, devised in 2005, was “in dire need of a policy review”.
“Malta should explore alternatives to the current detention arrangements,” a UNHCR spokesman said. The agency offered the government its support in improving the existing system.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
J Schembri
Jul 3rd 2012, 12:07
Let's get facts straight.
My heart goes out to the 'accused' (for to me, they are innocent until proven guilty) and their families. I too have members of the family with the DS and I know what they face every day.
Does anyone know or carev what the DS officers face ...... spitting, the looks of hatred, the threats they get. Apart from the fact, that the NGOs don't give a damn of what these officers face. And these are Maltese NGOs!! Has anyone been present on distribution of food (which is 3 times a day)? Has anyone ever got pelted with boiling hot rice and had boiling hot water thrown at them? And that is to mention a few, because my relative got pelted with hard boiled eggs once because of a ridiculous thing - there was ONE egg missing.
Has anyone got struck with a blade, which they can hide very aptly in their mouths? Because for the life of me, I cannot imagine why they do not give them disposable razors, instead of blades.
And of course, there is more, I just mentioned a few instances.
I believe that a non-governmental organisation should be set up for the protection of these officers, because nobody is lifting a finger to better the situation of these officers and the daily dangers. These are people who have nothing to lose. And I am not being racist, by the way, before anyone opens his mouth to hurl insults.
M. Schembri
Jul 3rd 2012, 12:57
Innocent unitil proven guilty - I agree with that. But if they're not, are you trying to justift murder? Even if the things you say are true, a murder is a murder.
As for an NGO to protect officers - they should belong to a Trade Union, not an NGO. However if (and I repeat, if) they killed a person, no NGO or Trade Union can help them. It's a matter of the courts.
I hope justice will be done, without prejudice against either immigrants or officers.
angelo cilia
Jul 3rd 2012, 13:23
A Vladimir Putin type is needed to hobble these NGOs in their tracks.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-1-118293-NGOs-to-get-foreign-agent-tag-in-Russia
Franco Attard Trevisan
Jul 3rd 2012, 14:01
you are missing out on a very crucial point :
The officers chose their own career... One should look at all aspects of a job before applying and make sure they can handle all the job requirements... I am not condoning in any way any aggression by the said immigrants but before taking up the job I think they should have known it wasn't gonna be a walk in the park.
This excuse of the 'poor detention officers' and 'what they have to face every day' is simply absurd!
I agree that everyone is innocent until proven guilty
Patrick Zammit
Jul 3rd 2012, 15:51
Franco, are you saying that we should scrap Health and Safety on the workplace just because one, presumably chose his job?
Please choose the reason of your report below: