Damned signatures
I can't say I'm much of a tree-hugger or against all development. Just as trees are good for us and our lungs sometimes they have to be uprooted, trimmed or moved.
And let's all admit something. We do seem to be over-developing and raping this country of ours. But without the development that happened in these last few decades we'd have remained rooted to, yes, a more beautiful and pristine country, but maybe we'd have compromised our own betterment. A bit of spoiling gave us a lot of material gain which we all seem to enjoy.
That's my take on trees and buildings—I try to be practical and see everyone's point of view.
And seeing the point of view of others is exactly what we don't seem to cherish in this land of ours. Whatever a silly blogger or a few great minds think is hardly important but what about 25,000 people? Isn't that a huge number to stop and listen to and if you have any sense heed what they say?
I really can't get over how a petition with so many signatures was just disregarded by MEPA. I know I'm late with this blog piece as the newsworthiness of the tree-cutting appeal and subsequent approval of a development of apartments in a Mosta valley are rather long-gone from the public debate.
But the whole process of public debate is here put into the limelight—and terribly it seems that people power is sadly lacking. The only time the people are important, and their views held to be sacrosanct, is when there is a general election. Is this really right?
I would have thought that with all our petty wars and quixotic campaigns of being on the side of the citizen, a petition with so many signatures would have been given rather more weight.
I'm no great maths guy but isn't 25,000 like one-sixteenth of Malta's population? 400,000—our total population give and take a few scores—includes, I imagine, babes, kids with no vote and all those who are not fit to boot out a government every few years. So the signatories—unless the organisers included babes in arms too—form part of a bigger percentage of the enfranchised in Malta. And there were plenty of signatories—yet no one gave much of a hoot what they thought or believed. The developer won and Malta and its people lost their trees and part of their lifeline.
The needs of our country regarding trees and valleys is not the most relevant point—though I imagine our lungs will have a tougher time once we uproot the last tree and plant a few more flashy flats.
What is most upsetting in this scenario is that all those signatures, all those voices of the people were left unheeded. Is this people power?
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Alfred Grech
Jun 29th 2012, 23:41
One huge problem in this country is that the governments don't listen to the people - they act like dictators and push our desires aside.
Carmel Vella
Jun 30th 2012, 20:20
You are catching on to the truth. Time to take all politicians to task. Before voting any one of them in, what is their past performance, have them expose all their worth before taking office, real estate , bank accounts, etc. Then after a year or so in office, look again at what they are worth. I bet you , you will be amazed at how suddenly rich they become.
Carmel Vella
Jun 30th 2012, 20:20
You are catching on to the truth. Time to take all politicians to task. Before voting any one of them in, what is their past performance, have them expose all their worth before taking office, real estate , bank accounts, etc. Then after a year or so in office, look again at what they are worth. I bet you , you will be amazed at how suddenly rich they become.
Franco Farrugia
Jun 29th 2012, 20:41
Quote: 'A bit of spoiling gave us a lot of material gain which we all seem to enjoy.'
That's where I stopped reading this.
'A bit of spoiling'?
But ... but are you for real???? Imma sorry ta! Int qed tghix hawn Malta?
Francis Saliba M.D.
Jun 29th 2012, 18:15
There is nothing wrong in pruning trees in public places. There is a correct and an incorrect way of doing it.
Antoine Vella
Jun 29th 2012, 18:04
Unfortunately the petition did not talk only about trees but insisted that the Prime Minister interfere to revoke the development permit. It's like saying that the PM should reverse a court decision and that's wrong, whether it's said by a few great minds of 25 thousand misguided persons.
Andy Farrugia
Jun 29th 2012, 18:49
Come off it! What's wrong with having the PM or any politician for that matter express his /her displeasure about such a matter? I'm sure that there is nothing wrong in exerting pressure on MEPA to save whatever is left of our natural environment! And what makes you think that all those people are "misguided"? Just because they thought it fit to sign a petition in favour of the environment?
Victor Laiviera
Jun 29th 2012, 20:01
@ Antoine Vella
A completely false and misleading analogy.
MEPA is NOT a Court. Its Board Members are not Judges or Magistrates, who are protected from administrative influence in order to be able to take impartial decisions.
All decisions at MEPA are taken by the Board. And all the members of the Board (except one) are hand-picked and appointed by Lawrence Gonzi.
Victor Rodenas
Jun 29th 2012, 16:04
They do not listen, because they know that we grumble and grumble...........but we still vote for them.
Andy Farrugia
Jun 29th 2012, 16:36
Sadly, what you say is true.
Please choose the reason of your report below: