Advert

Pullicino Orlando sticks to his guns...but will not publish the messages from other fellow Nationalist MPs

Nationalist backbencher Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando yesterday stood by his claim that another eight government MPs wished to vote for the Richard Cachia Caruana motion.

The backbencher insisted he had mobile phone messages and witnesses to back his case but refrained from producing the proof.

“They were private conversations and I will not divulge the names or what was said but this morning (yesterday) a friend of mine reminded me of an instance when one of these MPs spoke openly about his wish to support the motion in front of me and two friends,” Dr Pullicino Orlando said.

During the parliamentary debate on Monday, Dr Pullicino Orlando said 10 MPs on the government side had expressed a wish to vote with the opposition to oust Mr Cachia Caruana, Malta’s EU envoy.

The MPs included Dr Pullicino Orlando, who voted with the opposition, and Jesmond Mugliett, who abstained.

On Thursday evening, the Nationalist Party rebutted Dr Pullicino Orlando’s claim with a declaration signed by 33 MPs saying they had no intention to vote for the opposition’s motion calling for Mr Cachia Caruana’s resignation. Missing from the list were Dr Pullicino Orlando and Mr Mugliett.

The PN even challenged the rebel MP to substantiate his claim.

“The MPs told me they wished to do it. It did not mean they were going to vote with the Labour Party and my vote was not determined by what they had told me,” Dr Pullicino Orlando said in reaction yesterday.

When asked whether he felt betrayed by the MPs’ decision to sign the PN declaration, Dr Pullicino Orlando said he would not judge them.

The PN executive on Wednesday condemned three of its MPs – Dr Pullicino Orlando, Mr Mugliett and Franco Debono – for the way they voted in Parliament on two Labour motions calling for the resignations of Mr Cachia Caruana and former Home Affairs Minister Carm Mifsud Bonnici.

ksansone@timesofmalta.com

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Edmond Micallef

Jun 23rd 2012, 14:02

Very good legalistic observation there. That is exactly how the Pn operated. Legally correct but morally defective and politically deceitful.

J Pisani

Jun 23rd 2012, 12:03

PROSITSUR CACHIA. WELL SAID AND EXACTLY SO !!

Advert
Advert