Advert

Blogger says she only met Cachia Caruana in person 12 times since 2008

Blogger Daphne Caruana Galizia said this evening that even though she has known Richard Cachia Caruana for most of her adult life, she only met him in person about 12 times since the 2008 election.

In all but two of those occasions, she said, there were other people, including her husband.

Another two, around April 2009, involved Dr Pullicino Orlando and his consort, Carmen Camilleri Ciantar.

Mrs Caruana Galizia was referring to claims made by Dr Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando in today's The Times, criticising her 'closeness' to Mr Cachia Caruana and saying it was unacceptable for high-ranking PN and government officials to 'cavort' with her when she 'disgustingly' derided Nationalist 'icons' like the late President Emeritus Guido de Marco.

Mrs Caruana Galizia said in a statement that this year, she met Mr Cachia Caruana three times. In the whole of last year, she met him twice, once while greeting each other as he left and she entered a Christmas drinks party at mutual friends.

"I do not think that even Dr Pullicino Orlando would describe this as cavorting. I can only think, therefore, that he is not familiar with the facts and has either been falsely informed or has formed an impression based on inadequate observation and on prejudice."

Mrs Caruana Galizia said she criticised all politicians without fear or favour, wherever she deemed fit, and this included the people Dr Pullicino Orlando described as icons of the Nationalist Party.

"I notice that he failed to mention the prime minister, who I have criticised many times, most notably on divorce and Libya, perhaps because he considers it acceptable for Mr Cachia Caruana to 'cavort', all of three times a year, with somebody who has criticised Lawrence Gonzi.

"It is not up to Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando to decide which politicians are allowed to speak to which journalists, and vice versa. Claiming quite disingenuously that his behaviour in parliament last Monday was based on his moral objection to Richard Cachia Caruana talking to journalists, when those journalists are critical of him and his 'icons', makes it clear that he has freedom of speech issues, of which intolerance of criticism is evident."

Mrs Caruana Galizia said Dr Pullicino Orlando also demonstrated that he did not know his obligations as a member of parliament.

"Those obligations include the duty to vote on the matter in hand – the contents of the motion – rather than for his own, apparently spurious, reasons. Dr Pullicino Orlando also needs to remember that he remains my representative in parliament, for I was one of those who voted for him. While a constituent can and should criticise the actions of her representative in parliament, because she put him there to do represent her, the roles cannot be reversed. A member of parliament cannot and should not use the platform given to him by his constituents to attack one or more of them."

She said she was particularly perplexed at Dr Pullicino Orlando's confused notion that Mr Cachia Caruana deserved the ultimate censure for the reasons he gave to The Times journalist.

"He has given different reasons elsewhere, most notably today on Facebook.

"Using his own yardstick, how much more severely should he be censured for actually cohabiting with a member of the Labour Party and socialising with others, including the Leader of the Opposition? But then, perhaps he does not 'cavort' with them. Also, he belongs, at least nominally, to the liberal party, which would not countenance any such thing."

Advert

46 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

P. Zammit

Jun 20th 2012, 20:20

Why ? You never made a wrong choice in your life ? I too believed JPO in the whole Mistra saga before the last general election, but when the truth came out I have no hesitation to state that he should have resigned.

Adrian Said

Jun 20th 2012, 20:04

Mr. Fenech, don't you think that the other party is trying to make you 'swallow old rubbish' as well, when they say that they are a new progressive party!?!?!?!?!?!

Angus Black

Jun 20th 2012, 20:06

Look who is accusing the NP of being still 'entrenched somewhere in the 70s'! A Labour Party which not only is still entrenched in the 70s and 80s, but is modelling the 'new movement of moderates and progressives' on the repugnant regimes of Mintoff and KMB!

Hold your noses, folks!

Antoine Vella

Jun 20th 2012, 20:41

Albert Fenech, you can agree or disagree with Daphne but calling her statement 'self-effacing' shows you do know the meaning of the word.

Why do people like you insist on using words without even knowing their meaning?

Denis Pace

Jun 20th 2012, 21:43

Rather biased comments, Mr.Fenech.
Very Labour-apologetic.....intolerant of criticism....as usual

Angus Black

Jun 20th 2012, 20:07

What about Joseph's e-mails to moles?

Kenneth Cassar

Jun 21st 2012, 07:09

Yes, what about phone calls? Are these illegal now?

J Busuttil

Jun 20th 2012, 18:35

@ Eddy Privitera ta' CNI

At least she is always spot unlike your blogs.

Chris Gatt

Jun 20th 2012, 18:35

congratulations. It only took 8 comments before the Conspiracy theorist turned up. Seriously Eddy put a sock in it, you convince no one but yourself.

R. Saliba

Jun 20th 2012, 19:25

Any comments about the times when DCG criticised Dr. Gonzi? Or is this conveniently forgotten?

Mr Joe Micallef

Jun 20th 2012, 19:38

Privitera being himself the consenting victim of the PL hogwash (Privi, remember what they made you believe and write about the EU to then leave you hanging like a hapless idiot whilst they leaped on the gravy train) and a socialist opportunist, selective reading is a profession!

Frans Aguis

Jun 20th 2012, 19:54

R.Saliba
I read her blog. When Dr Gonzi is criticized it is usually with kid gloves, or "criticizing" him for being too good or too nice. In the divorce issue he was treated as wrong but we were constantly reminded of how this was only opportunism by the PL.

scott brown

Jun 20th 2012, 19:55

what is so wrong with a journalist having connections. don't you have any connections yourself mr. privitera. from your contributions you seem to be the PL spokesperson in this blog, inviting contributors to meet your leader (as long as it is in your presence) and rebutting anything against your socialist party sic liberal sic progressive/regressive movement. no, we are not daft. we do not take any of your contributions seriously.

m. borg (slm)

Jun 20th 2012, 18:47

As sharp as a Bar-B-Q plastic knife.

Mr Joe Micallef

Jun 20th 2012, 19:43

Borg you have reached unimaginable lows! Couldn't you have written as sharp as a smile or a razor blade! No, I understand, they made you buy them on ONE and you ruined your first summer BBQ.

Get off ONE and stop digging!

Chris Gatt

Jun 20th 2012, 18:36

and your point is?

Advert
Advert