Russia accuses US of arming Syria rebels
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the United States today of supplying weapons to Syria's rebels.
Lavrov's accusation followed a charge by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that she had information Russia was sending to Syria "attack helicopters ... which will escalate the conflict quite dramatically."
Lavrov told a news conference during a brief visit to Iran that Russia was supplying "anti-air defence systems" to Damascus in a deal that "in no way violates international laws."
"That contrasts with what the United States is doing with the opposition, which is providing arms to the Syrian opposition which are being used against the Syrian government," he said, in remarks translated from Russian into Farsi by an official interpreter.
It was the first time Moscow has directly pointed the finger at Washington. Previously, it had said unidentified "foreign powers" were arming the opposition.
Asked in Tehran about the helicopter allegation, Lavrov said only that Moscow was giving Damascus "conventional weapons" related to air defence and asserted that the deal complied with international law.
"We do not supply to Syria or anywhere else things that are used to fight peaceful civilians," he said.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said last month that Moscow believed "it would be wrong to leave the Syrian government without the means for self-defence."
Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said at the same news conference with Lavrov that Tehran and Moscow were "very close" on the Syrian issue.
Western and Arab nations, he said, "are sending weapons to Syria and forces to Syria, and are not allowing the reforms promised by the Syrian president to be applied."
Reports in Iran allege that Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United States are arming Syria's rebels -- termed "terrorists" by Damascus -- while US officials claim Iran is giving arms and military advisors to Syria's regime.
Some observers fear the conflict, which the UN's chief peacekeeper agrees said is a civil war, could blow up into a struggle between forces helped by outside nations.
"There is a real risk of it sliding into a proxy war as certain states support the regime or 'the opposition'," one Western diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition on anonymity.
"The conflict in Syria certainly appears to be getting more brutal -- and not just on one side," the diplomat warned.
Monitors say more than 14,100 people have been killed in the 15-month uprising against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Russia came under fierce criticism from Western and Arab countries for vetoing two UN Security Council resolutions that would have sanctioned Assad for his use of force.
Since then, it has sought to distance itself from Assad while continuing to support his regime. "We do not support any individual or government, we support the people of Syria," Lavrov said.
Moscow is now trying to organise an international conference on Syria that would include several nations with influence over the conflict, including Iran. The United States, Britain and France, though, object to Iran taking part.
"We want the support of all the players," Lavrov said.
"All sides in the conflict need to stop operations ... Any player with leverage should apply pressure to stop the violence and facilitate negotiations," he said.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Robert Agius
Jun 14th 2012, 07:20
Maybe they can make a case and mutually agree to stop selling weapons.....of course, we know that is not going to happen.
Robert Callus
Jun 13th 2012, 22:32
"it would be wrong to leave the Syrian government without the means for self-defence."
Who elected the Syrian government? Not the Syrian people in a democratic election for sure. What legitimacy does a non-democratically elected government have? Why should it have a right for self defence?
@dingaling rockcliffe
"These Russians" have absolutely nothing to blame. They didn't elect their own leaders (of course there was a rigged election where dissidents were beaten up and arrested but that doesn't mean anything) It's unfair and absurd to blame people for the actions of their government even if it was democratically elected (they might not have voted for it), let alone if it isn't.
michael southgate
Jun 13th 2012, 21:05
... BUT IT'S OK FOR THE USA TO ENCOURAGE THE ARMING OF FOREIGN ISLAMIST FIGHTERS IN SYRIA?
marthese schembri
Jun 13th 2012, 20:36
Here we go again if it weren't for these Russians syria's problems would have been solved by now, but no the world's trouble makers are at it again, these Russians are a menace to the human race. if i had my way i would do the same as Mr.Dom Mintoff done with the British kick'em all out and now its the Russians turn before they get us into another world war for something that doesn't even concern these idiots.
Stefan Zammit
Jun 13th 2012, 23:06
mintoff never kicked anyone out. It was just a contract for a military base, which ran out.
Robert Agius
Jun 14th 2012, 07:24
If it were not for the Russians, the US and friends would have it their way. Or can't you see what is happening in the middle east and how they are changing the map to suit their need. Or how no action was taken when protest were held in US friendly nations. Clearly you need to read your history books again before viewing the Russians as the single world's trouble makers.
Wenzu Vella
Jun 14th 2012, 09:57
Dear Marthese the Russians has never started a war in the Middle East. One cannot say the same for our friends the Americans. Iraq a sovereign state invaded by the Americans on the strength of a lie. Tens of thousands of innocent people dead and injured, over two million Iraqis refugees, the infrastructure and the economy still in ruin.
Supplying the best of military hardware to Israel including cluster bombs a vicious way to kill and injure innocent civilians mainly children. Building of settlements on occupied Palestinian land that it is illegal under international law which the Americans keep vetoing in the UN.
The only interest the Americans have in Syria is to destabilize it for the benefit of a stronger Israel.
dingaling rockcliffe
Jun 13th 2012, 17:34
These Russians - if that's not war warmongering then i don't know. They are always looking for trouble, the problem is we're so naive by letting these Russians worming themselves into our country, starting by trying to marry
Maltese for a passport, then they work themselves up into norhtern europe, England -Germany etc., you name it these Russians are everywhere. So watch out there is a Russian about!
Please choose the reason of your report below: