Advert

Betting shop in heart of Senglea 'contravenes urban conservation areas policy' - FAA

The site of the proposed gaming shop in Senglea.

The site of the proposed gaming shop in Senglea.

Environment NGO Flimkien Ghal Ambjent Ahjar said today it was supporting the view of a number of Senglea residents that a proposed betting shop/gaming hall in the heart of the city should not be granted a permit.

An application for the betting shop to be set up in a palazzo on Senglea's main road is due to be discussed by Mepa tomorrow.

"One month ago, Flimkien ghal Ambjent Ahjar, Friends of Cottonera Forum and some local residents objected to this application at Mepa on the grounds that it contravenes the guidelines as to what commercial outlets are allowed in urban conservation areas and due to the fact that it does not enhance the quality of life of residents in this city.

"Efforts to improve the social fabric of Cottonera are beginning to bear fruit and the future could be a bright one if cultural tourism were to be developed to the benefit of the residents...allowing this application for a gaming room in an old historical building would open the doors to many others and would effectively nullify all the official policies and programmes related to social regeneration and the upgrading of Urban Conservation Areas," the FAA said.

"Gaming rooms are contrary to the promotion of good neighbourliness inherent in the Grand Harbour Local Plan which encourages small-scale retail space in or order to keep our towns and villages alive. The change of use from class 4 shop into a class 9 gambling hall would represent a loss of retail shopping space and thus be contrary to policy GL18 of the area plan for Senglea."

The society argued that research showed that slot-machine establishments did not target those with disposable incomes but rather those who could not afford to waste their income.

FAA noted that in Cospicua, the Mayor had been able to stop six applications for gaming rooms in his city. However Senglea Local Council appeared to have failed to take an active role in this matter. It was hoped that this council would be present to protect the community's interests at the Mepa hearing tomorrow.

Advert

65 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Franco Farrugia

Apr 17th 2012, 06:30

U l-hwienet tal-lottu x'jaghmlu, sur Attard?
Jien naqbel mieghek - imma nghidlek wahda: JIEN qatt ma dhalt go 'betting shop' wiehed. Mela, mhux huma li 'jirrovinaw hafna familji' imma min hu injurant u min irid jirrovina l-familja, jirrovinaha, u ma noqghodux nilghabu u nduru mal-lewza. Ejja nghidu l-affarijiet kif inhuma.Hafna affarijiet 'jirrovinaw il-familji' - inti trid tkun biex toqghod attent u tara li ma tmurx mal-hazin.
Imma naqbel li ghandna noqghodu attenti fejn inhallu dawn l-'outlets' jifthu.

Astrid Vella

Apr 16th 2012, 19:59

Jonathan, your argument is completely off the point. No one is blocking individuals from gambling, harmful though that is. We are simply saying that operators of gambling shops have to obey the laws and regulations, including MEPA regulations of what is allowed in Urban Conservation Areas.

Don't these unscrupulous characters do enough damage without letting them wreck our villages illegally as well? Or are you saying they're above the law?

Eddy Privitera

Apr 16th 2012, 20:44

Jonathan, if you want to gamble, go to one of the casinos. But I suppose that if you lose all your money in gambling, you might end up committing a crime to get the money to feed yourself or to continue gambling, which can be a worse drug than some of the drugs we know ! And so you will become a threat to society, as well as a financial burden ! Government is there to protect society. And gambling outlets in our villages and towns are a real threat to society in general.

Corin Moss

Apr 16th 2012, 20:52

Dear Jonathan,

Freedom is indeed a beautiful and hard won facet of the gem that is our civilisation, however that freedom extends to the freedom of residents to reside "at peace" in their chosen domicile.

A "development" such as this threatens this core freedom. The tacit approval of such gambling establishments represents the tyranny of the state against its citizens (in this case, the residents of Senglea) - robbing their right to peaceful enjoyment.

Any proponent of the freedom expounded by John Stuart Mill in "On Liberty" (and I presume by your writing that you are a well read student of Mill) should be familiar with the complex analysis of this exact problem contained within his work. If perhaps you are a little hazy on his arguments, you could try reading Chapter 5, which specifically discussed gambling houses.

In short, I agree with you Jonathan - let us promote freedom - the freedom of the good people of Senglea to be rid of the specter of gambling and all of the well documented problems it brings! The freedom of the people of Senglea to raise their children in a healthy, civilised neighbourhood, free of the all too obvious scars left by such an establishment.

Jean-Pierre Aquilina

Apr 16th 2012, 21:46

Can I give you my bank account number? I could do with some extra cash.

Michel Ellul

Apr 16th 2012, 22:20

You wrote it Mr Caruana, it's a free country and you are free to go to Las Vegas if you are so much into gambling.
There are already social problems due to gambling habits and yes if this so called 'Hall' will further contribute to these social problems, then it should be stopped at once!

Manuel Mangani

Apr 16th 2012, 19:51

Whose decisions? The decision to grant permission to thegambling dens' owners to set up shop once again, does not appear to carry the approval of the Maltese people.

Franco Farrugia

Apr 17th 2012, 06:28

@ Manuel Mangani: I am against these gambling parlours, but if you don't want them around, you also have to close down the hwienet tal-lottu.

S. Azzopardi

Apr 16th 2012, 20:25

I am Maltese and I don't agree. Wanting to open betting shops in areas where it is known that gambling is already causing a lot of problems means literally wanting to use these social problems for personal profit.

Ms Xaxa Caruana

Apr 17th 2012, 09:18

@Jonathan Caruana

'Those who don't like our decisions can go back to their respective countries. Some of you whining here are not even Maltese. If you don't like our decisions, leave.'

And tell me what should Senglea family's do? Leave their homes too cause you say so? If this permit is given at the end of the day Sengela people will suffer and not foreigners.

Sengla Local Counsil, please NOTE!!!

Manuel Mangani

Apr 16th 2012, 19:47

Online gambling produces casualties among punters, no doubt about it. Gambling parlours wreak even greater psychological and social havoc and are accessible even to those who are computer-illiterate.

S. Azzopardi

Apr 16th 2012, 20:26

Since that is the case, we don't need another betting shop.

Anne Marie Kissaun

Apr 16th 2012, 21:17

So true. A greater problem is that sometimes youngsters underage who look older then they are are allowed in. I hope that at least an ID card should be presented at the entrance. This should also apply to Bars in Paceville, where, I know for sure that under 16s are beiing allowed in as excuses are being given that Oh, well, I forgot my ID at home pretence, and when it is done a few times, the guy at the door gives up and allows the girl/boy in. It is a great pity and shame.

Franco Farrugia

Apr 16th 2012, 19:17

What does this petty comment have to do with the subject at hand? What does this have to do with 'Europe'? Since time immemorial there were 'banek tal-lottu' in towns and villages and weren't 'European' then! So, if we have no 'values' now, we weren't so well off either then. The only problem now is that 'gambling' is much more attractive, that's all. That said, I agree that in such a vulnerable area as The Three Cities, this 'development' should be a no-no.

U ha nirripeti ruhi bil-Malti biex forsi 'A.F. Busuttil' jifhimni, wara l-kumment li tefa' u l-mod kif tefghu:
X'ghandu x'jaqsam dan il-kumment miskin tieghek mas-suggett t'hawn? X'ghandu x'jaqsam mal-'Ewropa'? Sa' minn zmien l-antik fil-bliet u r-rhula taghna kien hemm il-banek tal-lottu u dak iz-zmien, zgur ma konniex 'Ewropej' kif ahna llum. Mela, skont il-logika, jekk issa minhabba dan l-izvilupp m'ghandniex 'valuri', qas kellna lanqas dak iz-zmien. Il-problema llum hi li dan il-loghob tal-azzard qed ikun pingut wisq izjed attraenti, dak kollox. Xorta naqbel li f'postijiet socjalment vulnerabbli bhat-Tliet Ibliet, 'zvilupp' bhal dan m'ghandux qas jigi kontemplat.

Eddy Privitera

Apr 16th 2012, 19:03

R.Saliba, meta tqabbel il-coffee-mornings ma' hwienet tal-loghob tal-azzard, qisek qed tqabbel in-nida max-xita ! Mhux ghax ma naqbilx li certi nies, specjalment nisa, jghamlu hazin li jonfqu aktar milli jistghu f'loghob tat-tombla. Izda wiehed irid izomm bilanc. Dawn il-postijiet fejn wiehed jista jitlef eluf ta' ewros f'jum wiehed, huwa theddida kbira ghal familji. U specjalment ghal dawk li ghandhom nuqqas ta' edukazzjoni, li huma l-aktar li jaqghu fin-nassa tal-loghob tal-azzard !

Stephen Gatt

Apr 16th 2012, 21:43

prosit.... People who gamble either have no active life...
Best thing is to keep positive and keep yourself with new financial commitments/challenges that you can reach and hopeful in the future one will be better off!!!

Astrid Vella

Apr 16th 2012, 18:23

Carmel, what you're proposing is cowboy country lawlessness. Even if the house is privately owned, the user, in this case the gambling shop owner, has to abide by the Urban Conservation policies.

Your car is privately-owned isn't it? But still you have to obey the law about road licence and insurance don't you?

Dennis Quaid

Apr 16th 2012, 18:03

what does MEPA have to do with that at all?

This is an issue with the Gaming Authority, they are allowing those shops to open. Mepa shouldn't be involved at all, as the shop was already there with a permit.

And why should those shops not be allowed in Senglea, but in B'kara, Sliema or Comino. If someone wants to gamble, there are always ways.

No gambling shop in Senglea --> is this something against civil rights when other localities allow them?

Astrid Vella

Apr 16th 2012, 18:29

Dennis, what you are saying is not correct. MEPA is involved as the present outlet is a shop not a gaming parlour, which is a different category. Gaming parlours are is not included in MEPA's list of recommended commercial uses in Urban Conservation Areas, in fact quite the opposite - the Local Plan insists that there is to be no reduction of retail space in the area, and this is not retail space, so it contravenes MEPA regulations.

The outlets in other towns might not be in Urban Conservation areas, so that's a different kettle of fish.

VINCENT WILLIAMS

Apr 16th 2012, 18:47

Mr D. Quaid.

I wrote that, quote"Such gaming shops should be all placed on Comino." unquote.

So in other words that means that such shops should not be allowed even in B'kara, Sliema or else where. They should be transferred to Comino as it will be VERY DIFFICULT to go to Comino instead of closing all such shops.

Instead of gambling people should be thought to do other valuable things that are more of benefit.

Betting shops are not a civil rights!! Betting shops are just pick pocketing!!

Ms Xaxa Caruana

Apr 17th 2012, 09:05

@Mary Borg

Sinjura l-gholi tal hajja kull Malti jgerger bijha mhux Sengleani Biss!!

X'esperjenza ghandek go l-ISLA inti? kif tipermetti ruhek tghid li in-nies t'hemm jilghabu hafna, !!!!
Forsi int xi wahda minnhom?

Nies li jilabu issibhom kullimkien, tigbidx lil kulhadt taht keffa wahda.
Din hija is-soltu diskriminazzjoni lejn Isla ghax parti mil Kottonera.

J. J. Borg

Apr 16th 2012, 17:41

One cannot expect our politicians to condemn legalized gambling in Malta even as they encourage on-line gaming companies to set up shop here. We cannot have two weights and measures where gambling is bad for the Maltese and fine for foreigners.

Gerald Duke

Apr 16th 2012, 20:42

I have been resident in Senglea for over 20 years. This application is contrary to MEPA policy yet our newly elected council sit on their hands and do nothing at a time when they should have no fear for their actions. Senglea is a very densely populated area and a development of this kind so close to schools and church is not appropriate. I strongly urge our newly elected and vigorous young councillors to act now. If they do not, my support for them and their abilities must be questioned throughout the rest of their elected term.

Advert
Advert