Advert

Mr Justice Albert Magri retires

Mr Justice Albert Magri. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

Mr Justice Albert Magri. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

Mr Justice Albert J. Magri ended his 41-year legal career this morning, with a final sitting attended by the Chief Justice, Justice Minister Chris Said,  members of the judiciary and lawyers.

Mr Justice Magri recalled his 21-years on the bench and said he agreed that one should only become a judge after serving as a lawyer for at least 12 years.

This was because to be a judge one had to have both legal and life experience. This was of utmost importance because on taking the oath of office, a judge cut himself off from his previous life and the experience he would have acquired helped him look at the people he would be passing judgement on in an objective manner.

Mr Justice Magri recalled being asked to become a judge by the late Guido de Marco.

His words were still clear.

"Alberto, now that your wife has passed away, accept my offer to become a judge which will help you leave the hectic life of a lawyer behind and that would enable you to work serenely from home while taking care of your children."

Prof. de Marco's comments about him being able to take care of his children, who were what he held dearest and still young, were what convinced him to accept the position.

He thanked everyone including his former colleagues, Judge Hugh Harding who worked at his legal office and family.

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

william cauchi

Feb 24th, 14:30

Tajba din, so you expect our Judges to be like sorijiet tal-klawsura, to be sure that they don't possibly meet somebody that could possibly end up before you for judgement. What the heck!!!

Anybody, for a million reasons, for the right or wrong reasons, whether guilty or completely innocent can end before a judge.

So how can you filter out who is who, especially in a small community like in Malta or for that case in Gozo.

Go for it Albert and enjoy your well earned retirement.






Franco Farrugia

Feb 24th, 14:46

@ William Cauchi: Ehm.... iva, that's right. Mr Seychell is correct.

william cauchi

Feb 24th, 15:13

Can't believe certain comments........................which century are you living in?

So which sort's of parties can a judge attend, or should he ask for the guest list before he attends, just in case!!!!

Isbah wahda tal weddings and family occasions, not even here, can the judges mix. Better let's move judges to Lazzaretto, so that we can assure they don't get contaminated.

Are you serious......

D. A . Agius

Feb 24th, 16:22

There are people and there are people. Judges and Magistrates are not a special breed of people. However, yes, they do have their own "aura" to maintain.

On the other hand, we should expect judges to refuse to judge cases in which family members or friends are involved.

It would be nice seeing governing politcians do the same but that's light years ahead for our parochial and all in the family political system.

P Bonnici

Feb 24th, 21:59

D A Agius

Politicians and judges perform completely different functions and therefore they cannot both behave in the same way. Politicians need votes, and he gets these from the public, so a politician has to 'sell' himself.

A judge is appointed, he does not need contact with the public except in a formal court setting.

william cauchi

Feb 24th, 23:28

@P. Bonnici ''A judge is appointed, he does not need contact with the public except in a formal court setting''

This leaves me completely without words.

Do you mean we lock judges somewhere and let them out only when they have court settings!!!!!

I do hope you meant something different.

Advert
Advert