Mr Justice Albert Magri retires
Mr Justice Albert Magri. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli
Mr Justice Albert J. Magri ended his 41-year legal career this morning, with a final sitting attended by the Chief Justice, Justice Minister Chris Said, members of the judiciary and lawyers.
Mr Justice Magri recalled his 21-years on the bench and said he agreed that one should only become a judge after serving as a lawyer for at least 12 years.
This was because to be a judge one had to have both legal and life experience. This was of utmost importance because on taking the oath of office, a judge cut himself off from his previous life and the experience he would have acquired helped him look at the people he would be passing judgement on in an objective manner.
Mr Justice Magri recalled being asked to become a judge by the late Guido de Marco.
His words were still clear.
"Alberto, now that your wife has passed away, accept my offer to become a judge which will help you leave the hectic life of a lawyer behind and that would enable you to work serenely from home while taking care of your children."
Prof. de Marco's comments about him being able to take care of his children, who were what he held dearest and still young, were what convinced him to accept the position.
He thanked everyone including his former colleagues, Judge Hugh Harding who worked at his legal office and family.
13 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Vassallo, (Bugibba)
Feb 24th, 17:43
@ Michael Seychell and William Cauchi:
The judiciary should be able to socialise normally but paying heed to what is normally expected from persons in their position,
It is however important that members of the judiciary acknowledge the necessity of abstaining from sitting in judgement of people they normally socialise with.
I don't really see anything objectionable in who they nominate as court experts to assist them in their duties, because there has to be an establishment of trust in the expert; but the experts do have to be seen as being knowledgeable and fair.
Best wishes for a long and happy retirement to Mr Justice Magri.
Edgar S. Galea
Feb 24th, 16:18
Before WWII, Judges and Magistrates lived a different life from nowadays: when they were appointed to the Bench, they had to be domiciled in Valletta or Floriana. If, before the appointment, they lived outside that area, they had to find a house there; they had to severe any contact with people: believe it or not, they use to live a lonely life. If they wanted to go for a walk, they used to do it without any companions or stopping to converse with friends. They did not attend the Casino Maltese as presently. Strictly speaking, they lived a lonely life, segregated from everybody. They used to accept the position knowing full well what kind of a life they had to endure.
Jason Brown
Feb 24th, 15:50
Good Luck with your retirement. Wish you all the best for your future
Carmel Grima
Feb 24th, 15:47
Niftakar it-tifel ta' wiehed mill-avukati difensuri ta' Missieri Karm Grima, kien lahaq magistrat wara biss 4 snin prattika ma missieru, u tghidx kemm qalu l-gazzetti. Missieri hu dak li wehel b'kollox inturtament biex ma jinkixfux dawk vjolenti tal15/10/1979.
Joe Grech
Feb 24th, 15:27
Although I do not know Mr. Justice Albert Magri, I wish to extend to him AD MULTOS ANNOS.
Ivan Gatt
Feb 24th, 15:14
A true gentleman, God bless you Albert
Now plan your retirement well and enjoy... ;-)
Dr. Ivan X. Gatt
Mellieha
Michael Seychell
Feb 24th, 14:01
Not so many years ago the Judiciary used to be cut away from society in general to the extent that even during a special occasions such as weddings and other family occasions the judicary did not stay in the reception hall with all the other guests. They used to stay in an adjacent hall or room, thus assuring themselves that none of the other guests or any other person, would have the opportunity to approch them knowing that soon such persons may have to appear before them.
Today some of the judiciary feels it is alright for them to attend all sorts of party even if and when there are police officias and other persons who may have to appear before the juidiciary on criminal or civil court hearings.
No wonder certain court decisions do not go well with the general public.
Michael Seychell
Tal-Pieta
william cauchi
Feb 24th, 14:30
Tajba din, so you expect our Judges to be like sorijiet tal-klawsura, to be sure that they don't possibly meet somebody that could possibly end up before you for judgement. What the heck!!!
Anybody, for a million reasons, for the right or wrong reasons, whether guilty or completely innocent can end before a judge.
So how can you filter out who is who, especially in a small community like in Malta or for that case in Gozo.
Go for it Albert and enjoy your well earned retirement.
Franco Farrugia
Feb 24th, 14:46
@ William Cauchi: Ehm.... iva, that's right. Mr Seychell is correct.
william cauchi
Feb 24th, 15:13
Can't believe certain comments........................which century are you living in?
So which sort's of parties can a judge attend, or should he ask for the guest list before he attends, just in case!!!!
Isbah wahda tal weddings and family occasions, not even here, can the judges mix. Better let's move judges to Lazzaretto, so that we can assure they don't get contaminated.
Are you serious......
D. A . Agius
Feb 24th, 16:22
There are people and there are people. Judges and Magistrates are not a special breed of people. However, yes, they do have their own "aura" to maintain.
On the other hand, we should expect judges to refuse to judge cases in which family members or friends are involved.
It would be nice seeing governing politcians do the same but that's light years ahead for our parochial and all in the family political system.
P Bonnici
Feb 24th, 21:59
D A Agius
Politicians and judges perform completely different functions and therefore they cannot both behave in the same way. Politicians need votes, and he gets these from the public, so a politician has to 'sell' himself.
A judge is appointed, he does not need contact with the public except in a formal court setting.
william cauchi
Feb 24th, 23:28
@P. Bonnici ''A judge is appointed, he does not need contact with the public except in a formal court setting''
This leaves me completely without words.
Do you mean we lock judges somewhere and let them out only when they have court settings!!!!!
I do hope you meant something different.