Australian PM launches party leadership contest
Kevin Rudd
Australia's prime minister Julia Gillard put her job on the line, announcing a leadership ballot in hopes of quashing a comeback by the premier she ousted in a Labour Party coup.
But Kevin Rudd's supporters said that even if Ms Gillard survives Monday's vote, the turmoil surrounding her unpopular government will continue until she is out.
Mr Rudd, who resigned as foreign minister during an official visit to the US, told reporters in Washington that he thinks Labour will lose next year's elections if Ms Gillard remains leader, and that government colleagues are encouraging him to run.
But he would not say whether he would challenge Ms Gillard in the leadership ballot of Labour politicians until he returns to Australia tomorrow.
Ms Gillard said she will abandon her leadership ambitions if Labour politicians choose Mr Rudd over her on Monday, and called on Mr Rudd to do the same if he loses.
"We need a leadership ballot to settle this question once and for all," she told reporters.
But Rudd supporters said he would continue to destabilise the government if he lost the ballot and would try to win another ballot at a later date.
A Rudd supporter, Senator Doug Cameron, said a Monday poll would be unfair because Mr Rudd would not have time to canvass support.
"It's clear that some senior ministers are intent on putting a stake through Kevin Rudd's heart and I don't think that's justified," Mr Cameron told Australian Broadcasting Corp television.
Ms Gillard ousted Mr Rudd as prime minister in June 2010 in an internal coup, and their centre-left Labour Party scraped through elections later that year to lead a minority government.
Polls now suggest Labour would suffer a devastating defeat, but Ms Gillard maintains she has her colleagues' support.
Mr Rudd, who was critical of sniping against him within the party, was plainspoken about what he saw as Ms Gillard's dim prospects to win in a national election, and touted his own stewardship while premier of Australia's economy during the global crisis.
"I've had many conversations with caucus colleagues and with ministerial colleagues. I'm very pleased and encouraged by the amount of positive support that encourages me to contest the leadership of the Australian Labour Party," Mr Rudd said.
He said his supporters regarded him as the best prospect to lead the ruling party to victory in the next elections and "to save the country from the ravages of an Abbott government", referring to the current opposition leader, Tony Abbott.
Earlier he had suggested that whatever Ms Gillard's fate is, it will be fairer than his own in 2010.
"I can promise you this: There is no way - no way - that I will ever be party to a stealth attack on a sitting prime minister elected by the people," Mr Rudd said.
"We all know that what happened then was wrong and it must never happen again."
In earlier comments, Mr Rudd left open the option of quitting politics, which would trigger a by-election and could cost Labour its single-seat majority in Parliament.
That would give the conservative opposition coalition the chance to form a new government if it can win the support of independent legislators, or it could force early elections.
In apparent anticipation of a Rudd bid for the party's leadership, Ms Gillard's deputy Wayne Swan issued scathing criticism of the former prime minister.
"For too long, Kevin Rudd has been putting his own self-interest ahead of the interests of the broader Labour movement and the country as a whole, and that needs to stop," he said in a statement.
Labour senior strategist Bruce Hawker said he spoke to Mr Rudd before his announcement and that Mr Rudd is likely to challenge Ms Gillard.
Before Mr Rudd announced his resignation, Ms Gillard had refused to comment on media reports that she intended to fire him as foreign minister for disloyalty.
Mr Rudd then criticised Ms Gillard for failing to defend him from colleagues' criticisms that he was undermining the government through his own leadership ambitions.
Ms Gillard said in a statement that she was taken by surprise by the resignation, and that Mr Rudd had never raised his complaints with her personally.
Many Australians were angry when the government dumped Mr Rudd, who was swept into office as prime minister by general elections in 2007. In Australia's system, the prime minister is chosen by a majority of politicians in the House of Representatives, not by voters.
Labour politicians moved against Mr Rudd in 2010 because opinion polls suggested they were unlikely to win elections that year under his leadership.
After the 2010 elections, Labour under Ms Gillard formed the first minority government in Australia since the Second World War.
Opposition leader Mr Abbott said Mr Rudd's resignation confirmed that the government is unworthy to continue in office.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
George Pisani
Feb 24th, 03:54
Let's get this right, Gillard may be living in the Prim Ministers official resident but she is not running the country!!!
It is the greens and the four independence who are running the country!!!
What Australia needs right now is AN ELECTION FOR BOTH HOUSES OF PARLAMENT!!!!
With an new election, the people will get rid of the RATS and restart the country.
m. borg (slm)
Feb 23rd, 14:18
A far cry from the local scene.
The Aussie PM has no parliamentary problem but only an inparty fight yet calls a leadership ballot,whilst locally the lack of a parliamentary majority is painted as an in party fight as an excuse for a one man race.
The Aussie PN is not doing a one man, ooops sorry, a one person race like our beloved Dr Gonzi.
Francis Grech
Feb 23rd, 12:59
Mr caruana don't be so naive have you ever lived in Australia under a conservative government ,noooooo so like the Ozzie's down under shout zip up mate,Labour in ozz done a lot of good thing fot the man in the street like free hospital and good pension when one retired and to top it all you don't have to pay for it I am still getting mine and only worked there for 20 years,that's what a Labour covernment does for working class people, Have a nice day blue.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Feb 24th, 10:11
Francis, you speak of Labour as though it is a monolith. There are many Labour people and governments I admire and have admired. Whitlam is among them and I am on record criticising Fraser and the then GG for their role in having Whitlam sacked. But please do not think these clowns are in that tradition or of that stature. Federally I stopped voting Labour since the mid-1980s. For the record I have lived under what you term conservative governments, Menzies, Holt, McMahon, Fraser and Howard. I'll take any one of them in place of these clowns. The Liberal Party has two groupings - conversative and ameliorative. I do not think many people would consider me conservative and I would not dream of voting for these Labour idiots. I mean do you hear what they are saying about each other? The reality is that Gillard can hardly garner 35% support of the Australian electorate. She is, not to put too fine a point on it, the kind of female politician we should never have. And what about that Senator Wong, a senator, who before the last election said she was against same-sex marriage because of tradition of beliefs but changed her mind as soon as the elction was over? Or Roxon who is blackmailing Rudd by saying she would not serve under him. Great female politicians. Or treasurer Swan Fake who was so venomous against Rudd. This is a party that is tearing itself apart and only a little more than a year before the next elections. Bring it on I say. At least Abbott has been spared some of the criticism from these vile reproduction of a human being. Yes I trust Abbott.
Joe Portelli
Feb 23rd, 11:08
Who gives the right for a single party to decide the country's PM , when the country voted in party with an identified leader meant to be the PM ? It happens so often in our great western democartic system, that must surprise those country who must see this as a corruption of power by the elected party !
One may recal (Churchill) words, Democracy is not the fairest but thats the best we have so far, perhaps the time has come for rules to change - if the elected PM has no confidence in his own party than the Government should also resign, it would then be a choice of either carrying out the work MPs are elected for or move over for someone else. All other Workers have to comply with working with their managers so why not MPs?
Joe Portelli
Feb 23rd, 11:38
and if the above rule was in place than Mr Rudd would still be the PM and Australia would have not wasted so much time and reputation with in-party fighting by conquistadors hiding behind others to climb into power.
Mr Tony Gatt
Feb 23rd, 12:54
It happenned in the U.K.- Gordon Brown was shoehorned in with a deal by Tony Blair; whatever his merits, he wasn't the prime minister people voted for.
Joe Caruana
Feb 23rd, 09:41
"Australian PM launches party leadership contest". This is another of Jooolya's dirty, gutter level tricks. For all she knows this could very well be a one horse race. Mr Rudd never said that he wants to contest the leadership. He knows he does not have the numbers to win and the events of the last 12 to 15 months have damaged him irreparably. It's more likely that he will quit politics and force a by election in a seat where he is so popular amongst the voters and therefore the backlash would be great. Whatever the outcome of the leadership contest the Australian people will continue to suffer under this totally inept Labour government.